Documents

Oral argument — Quinteros Ramos v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2010

They can't store all of this stuff forever, so they clean it out every so often. … Did the judge act arbitrarily, irrationally, and contrary to law? And under the circumstances here, the immigration judge did not.

Oral argument — 2661_Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2022

That's set by the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act of 1987. … The DOE noted its interpretive rule, and is therefore exempt from the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.

Oral argument — Village of Niles v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2026

Nobody took him off work for that period of time. With respect to all the other period of time, again, we rely on our issues of our disputes with accident and causation. … If there's any award to be made, it should be made airing on the side of the petitioner's claim. Further questions from the court? No, no. Okay. Thank you, counsel. Mr. Egan, you may reply.

Oral argument — Sue White v. DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2018

It's a real estate agent who has authority to act as a real estate agent and facilitate the move out from a property it's managing. That's all that is. She says in her own email, I'm not a lawyer. … That four-year period had not yet expired when judgment was entered in the second proceeding.

Oral argument — United States v. Rodrigues

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2003

Why was Jess Rodrigues never told that the Resolution Trust Corporation, which had initiated his prosecution and was acting as receiver of his savings and loan company, was at the very moment that this … Rodriguez's counsel billed during the overlapping period of time had anything whatsoever to do with Mr. Rodriguez. But beyond that, what Mr.

Oral argument — Zaffiri v. Pontiac RV Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2012

Well, they sold them air. What does they have to know? Well, we didn't know. We sold them air. It was nothing. But we sold it to them. … You can't sell air normally without, you know, you didn't prove a fraudulent intent on our behalf. Is that required?

Oral argument — Chemours Co FCLL C v. US Prot Agency

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2024

Seemingly, they may be referring to the Clean Water Act permit that North Carolina issued. But in their briefs, and I think here, too, they've disclaimed reliance on that for purposes of standing. … And if this is final agency action, then it's a substantive final agency action that has to go through notice and comment.

Oral argument — Garnett v. Morgan

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2009

And in making that assessment, the district court cited Bruton for the understanding of how egregious the comment was here. There are only two possible interpretations of this comment. … More importantly, in that period of time, the evidence presented was really all about the crime scene, Dan D'Orio's body after it was found, and Dan D'Orio's character.

Oral argument — Caroline Connor v. Unum Life Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2022

She was in the office around that period of time, and actually quite more. … So is that part of whether there's clear air, whether there was a factual finding?

Oral argument — Rutha Carroll v. Harris County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2015

Verrett said that he developed a reasonable suspicion, a reasonable suspicion that a criminal act was afoot. … There was a comment made that he should have knocked and announced. Barnes has already been talking to him.

Oral argument — United States v. Istvan Kopacz

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2024

So with regard to the issue of the comment, this is a picture of defendant, or this displays the defendant's face, I think was the comment. That was clear, clearly erroneous, right? No, Your Honors. … Our position there is the — anything that was elicited, like, for questions that only an expert could have, someone with this — I think the cases say, like, this air — like, it's this air of expertise.

Oral argument — United States v. Charles Barefoot, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2014

He's going to come clean? Why wouldn't he just come clean and they give him use immunity? And they said, well, we won't give him immunity. … We're saying that the plea agreement provision, paragraph 4F, was a use immunity provision, period.

Oral argument — Schweihs v. Chase Home Finance, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2016

You just say negligence, period. Negligence. Traditional negligence. … To please the Court, I have a few comments regarding where the points are.

Oral argument — Galvan v. Barnhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2004

The ALJ, I respectfully submit, did what I call acting as an expert witness. The ALJ said, well, there's no medically determinable reasons why Dr. Nolan should reach this conclusion. … So then if that's the case, why is it reversible that the ALJ decided to give greater weight to McKinsey's as he treated the Petitioner over a very long period of time? Two reasons.

Oral argument — Labor Network v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2019

The Utilization Review was submitted, and that Utilization Review found that that therapy, in that period of time, was not provided to relieve or cure the effects of that injury. … As soon as he said it was going to take an hour-long walk to get on it, she'd be working the garden, she'd be working at the racetrack, cleaning up the floor of the bathroom.

Oral argument — David Estrada-Escamilla v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2022

Okay, because I think your motion as worded was just a clean remand. Yes, Your Honor. Thank you, Counsel. Mr. Jacobs, you have about three minutes left. Thank you. … It lingers there for a long period of time. This case has been at the Ninth Circuit for over two years. There's been multiple extension requests.

Oral argument — Dean Dairy Holdings v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2016

If it's inevitable, or if an act of daily living could cause this, then it's not compensable. The case doubles that. … So, I mean, there was no – I mean, the order was he failed to prove no compensation, period. And that was affirmed and adopted by the Commission. That is what the order said? Yes, Mr. Justice.

Oral argument — United States v. Berryhill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2025

This has been going on for some period of time, and that's not inconsistent with what he argued, that he's in the transportation role only. … In short, the fact that we're left with kind of an ambiguous possibly comments from the judge here that have caused this appeal, the burden for that falls on the defendant.

Oral argument — Apogee Coal Company v. OWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2024

I'll clean it up when I get back up here in a minute. Because the ALJ's decision, at 477, you're deep in the ALJ's decision. Yes. You just may be citing the wrong page. … We presume that agencies act against the common law background of insurance. Past practice, you know, we gave the examples, particularly of Adkins and Allen, all of that.

Oral argument — United States v. MI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2024

Then there was a longer period of time to hear the other, the Sioux St. Marie tribe's objections. … You're really asking us to become the district court, or to send it back and tell them to clean it up.