Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Shamond Jenkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2024

In terms of the harmlessness questions, Your Honors, the Coy air is not structural. … A couple of comments or questions, Mr. Whalen. One, I have to say I've rarely seen a weaker harmlessness argument than this. We've got three charged robberies and we get all three results.

Oral argument — Acmet, Inc. v. The Wet Seal, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2017

So the order, same page as 633 says, Tony will arrange air shipment for that. … We appreciate the arguments and comments from all three of you. The case just argued is submitted.

Oral argument — People v. Bell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2010

In this case, the 58-year-old defendant and Penny have lived together for 10 or 11 months, a significant period of time. … Did you provide any authority to this Court dealing with the question of assuming common authority exists, when and how it's terminated, over what period of time and what acts?

Oral argument — United Parcel Service, Inc. v. PRC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2020

We agree with that, and that's what we said in our comments. I at least finally understand. … The first piece of this, so 657 through 659, summarizes the commission's reasoning in that circumstance and also what the commenter said in response.

Oral argument — Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2017

And so laying the factual framework that Your Honor asked for, these IPRs didn't come out of thin air. … The page that you had pointed to, Judge Moore, APP Act 6394. Okay, I'm there.

Oral argument — Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2017

And so laying the factual framework that Your Honor asked for, these IPRs didn't come out of thin air. … The page that you had pointed to, Judge Moore, APP Act 6394. Okay, I'm there.

Oral argument — United States v. Chad Camou

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2013

There is technology that allows certain advanced phones to be wiped clean from some distance. … How typical on this cheap of a phone is that someone would have the ability to come in and wipe a memory clean? I don't know how cheap this phone was, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Price

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2008

For marijuana, though, I would imagine that nine baggies and 6.2 grams could sustain someone for a fairly lengthy period of time. … You know, the best way to try a case is do it clean and right and fast. And, Your Honor, I believe that was done here.

Oral argument — Donald Phillips v. Randy White

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2017

I have to clear the air on some of the things that opposing counsel has said here because the court has some really important questions about this case. … And if you're rewriting the contract, that allows the company to violate the self-help rule during the status quo period.

Oral argument — Scott Nordstrom v. Charles Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017

Because we cannot act without jurisdiction at any point. … It's been fully aired. It's now been vetted by the district court, by this court, on two occasions.

Oral argument — The Bank of New York Mellon v. Star Hill Homeowners Assoc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2023

very clear and can be resolved just off of documents subject to judicial notice from the bankruptcy court records so that we could preserve judicial resources better rather than having essentially a clean … But the Supreme Court of Nevada wrote in Thunder Properties at page 306, 503p3rd at 306, it takes more than mere notice of an adverse claim to trigger the limitations period.

Oral argument — United States v. Micah Iverson Kelly

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2017

And so it's these products that come on the market that say things like plant food or cleaning product as a software human consumption. They're things your people use are easy to identify. … So how many other Kelly cases are out there for this period of time during which a temporary listing was in effect?

Oral argument — GIANNETTI v. THE BURLINGTON

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2005

Looking at the four corners of the complaint, originally five, all we know is that it is asserted that Giannetti Feldman were negligent, period, and that resulted in property damage. … It's out of acts of negligence, and we are an insured under the policy. The burden then shifts.

Oral argument — United States v. Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2025

I don't recall seeing any evidence about seeing other people in the cars running their air conditioning, etc., etc., what you just said. Did I miss that? … So, Your Honor, I think Judge Oreck's comments need to be considered in the overall context in which they were made.

Oral argument — People v. Pollock

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2014

And what I want to describe for your honors is the extent to which the judge in the Certificate of Innocence case was by no means writing on a clean slate. … We will take this matter under advisement, and to the written disposition within a short period. We'll now take a short recess.

Oral argument — Leslie Crawford v. City of Bakersfield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2019

And during that period of time, who knows what could have happened during that period of time. No, I understand that. … Dozer was acting at the time.

Oral argument — Kirtz v. Trans Union LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2022

They're all part of the same Consumer Credit Protection Act. So Congress, when it wanted to create exceptions, knew how to do that during that time period. … Did it expose the United States states or government agencies to those criminal or that whole series of provisions, including period?

Oral argument — Andrew Rutherford v. Jason McKissack

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2012

So, it seems that he acted responsibly in that sense. … Good, clean, thoughtful arguments. Thank you. Rutherford v. McKissack and Chin, now submitted for

Oral argument — 04-35407 ISSC, Inc v. Baugh-Skanska Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2005

Judge Lasnik understood the full effect of the unconditional release, and the effect was it released Miller Act claims through November 30, 2002. No Miller Act claim is made for that period. … If you want your job clean, then someone's going to have to redesign these things if someone's going to allow suppliers to spread money over six jobs. But if you, well...

Oral argument — People v. Cunningham

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2017

I think, let the jury know that there was 13 contacts in this time period. … And I know my opponent is arguing plain-air exception, and the state is responding that the evidence was not closely balanced, so plain-air should not apply.