Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.12s
Petitioners Brief — Swenson v. Stidham
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1973
C, Tr. 24, Cause No. 54674). … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970).
409 U.S. 224Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Thomas L. Wheeler, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 19, 2024
New York, 399 U.S. 66, 68 (1970)). 17. Id. … No. 90-632 (Oct. 24, 1968). 35.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Vernon Madison, Petitioner v. Alabama
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 18, 2018
Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Weeks v. State, 663 So. 2d 1045 (Ala. Crim. … Ex. 7, Vol. 5, at 24; Pet. Ex. 10 at 12.)
Agency decision · Agency decision
Inc., 399 F.3d 181, 193–94 (3d Cir. 2005)). … Dentsply, 399 F.3d at 193; Minn. Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Appleton Papers, Inc., 35 F. Supp. 2d 1138, 1144 (D. Minn. 1999).
Federal Trade CommissionAppendix — Accuracy in Media, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1976
Reference to the legislative history of the "* 47 U.S.C. §399 (Supp. … Schott, 29 F.C.C.2d 35, 36 (1971) (in which the Commission expressly refused to assert jurisdiction over networks). 24 See United States v.
425 U.S. 934Appendix — Liberty Loan Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1974
The vice, if any, was in the method of allocating this charge (for income expense) among the 399 individual members of the group. … Eustice, Affiliated Corporations Revisited: Recent Developments Under Sections 482 and 367, 24 Tax L.Rev. 101, 105 (1968).
419 U.S. 1089Respondents Brief — Quarles v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 914 (2019) (No. 17-778)
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2019
Ct. 399 (2018) 16 139 S. Ct. 399 (2018) bassin Welch v. United States, 136 S8. Ct. 1257 (2016) 4 Young v. State, 266 S. … Ct. 399, 405 (2018). Under that approach, courts examine the “stat- utory definition!”
Records Schedules; Availability and Request for Comments
Federal Register · Notice · Sep 25, 2008
Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration (N1-399-08-6, 2 items, 2 temporary items). … E8-22566 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
73 FR 55541National Archives and Records AdministrationPentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB); Amendments to Terminate Uses
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 15, 2009
Number EPA Registration Number prior to transfer Product type (manufacturing-use or end-use product) Product Name (names of transferred products may be expected to change) 5481-8981 400-399 … End-use Turfcide 15G 5481-8995 400-458 End-use Terraclor 15G 5481-8996 400-459 Manufacturing-use Terrazan PCNB Technical 99% 5481-8997 400-460 End-use Terrazan 24%
74 FR 34337Environmental Protection AgencyEntry-Level Driver Training: State of Alaska Application for Renewal of Exemption
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 1, 2024
operate only within the 14 geographic areas identified in Section VII.A of this Notice; and (5) Drivers must comply with all other applicable Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (49 CFR parts 350-399 … [FR Doc. 2024-22457 Filed 9-30-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
89 FR 80008Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationOpposition Brief — Bencel v. Frost
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1965
(Pet. 464i, 51, 52; J.A. 339-345, 399- 400.)*- Mickel and Johnson tei in their semua (1) | that the Company would lose business if unionized ; (2) that the Company was able and willing to keep the … | went” would continue to hire its employees ‘‘through gaining unit who had worked for the Company for 30 days or more during the preceding 12 months, or for 45 days or more during the preceding 24
382 U.S. 831Memorandum — Habig v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1973
Agent Vandever testified that at approximately 3:30 a.m. on October 24, he crawled through the bushes and then between the two vehicles parked in the Holiday Inn lot and put his nose down close to … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51-52; Carroll y. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 153: see Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433.
411 U.S. 972Supplemental Brief — Winterthur Reinsurance Corp. of America v. California
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1993
See Winterthur Pet, 23-24. When all is said and done, plain- tiffs are still consumers of primary insurance, and Win- terthur and other reinsurers are stil! sellers only of re- insurance. … VoTH ARNOLD & PORTER 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 715-1000 DouGLAS L. WALD ANNETTE M. LANG ARNOLD & PORTER 1200 New Hampshire Ave., N.W.
509 U.S. 921Record and brief — Supreme Court Records & Briefs 1935 Full Opinions
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1935
Conmisbioncr | 24 16 " 113 Schuy]ki1] Trust Ca. v. Pennsylvan 3 7 133 American surety Co. v. Electric -Co. 12 5 141 Vutaiineds ve’ Furland , “1 176 Pacific States Co. v. White 5" 189 U.S. v. … Lunsford 399 8». 403 Pacific Tel. Co. v. Tax Comm'n, baa 34 420 Leahy v. State Treasurer Ne 599. "2 422 Bayside Fish Flour Co. Vv. Gentry 2:° 4 “431 Whitfield v. Ohio 377 7 441 Matson Nav.
Petitioners Reply Brief — Court House Plaza Co. v. City of Palo Alto
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1983
Id., at 399-400, 171 Cal.Rptr. at 402. … Dated: October 24, 1983 Respectfully submitted, S & MAN Nlalman J EY P. WIDMAN Attorneys for Petitioner CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) Jeffrey P.
464 U.S. 935Reply — Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.
Supreme Court brief · Reply · 1976
The significance of this additional seniority for each employee in the class is discussed at length in our brief on the merits at 24-29. … Jd. at 399.
424 U.S. 747Agency decision · Agency decision
On June 24, 1977, the Church of God Chapel sought to confer preference status upon the 399 Interim Decision #2797 respondent as a minister.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewTribal code · Tribal code
For special arrangements after business hours call (918)399-1756. … Keys need to be returned with 24 hours after building usage. Keys that are not returned are subject to a $75.00 fee to have the locks changed. This will come out of the security deposit.
Prologue — Tilton v. Ramirez (No. 05-736)
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005
Brown 399 F.3d 964 (9th Cir. 2005) Rose v. Lundy 455 U.S. 509 (1982) Rummel v. Estelle 445 U.S. 263 (1980) Schriro v. Smith ek. ee 126 S. Ct. 7 (2005) Singleton v. … United States District Court, Central District of California, Denying Certificate of Appealability _ APPENDIX G Judgment of the United States District Court, Central District of California 21 24
Brief Amicus Curiaeoo — See v. City of Seattle
Supreme Court brief · Brief Amicus Curiaeoo · 1967
Amoebic Dysentery in Chicago, 24 Am. J. ‘Pos. | DDE CE pias se kee ak oc e's ll - D.C. Dept. Licenses & Inspections Rep., ‘‘ Hous- inc CopE EnrorceMEenT’’ (Dec. 24, 1958) ....: 11 Fire Journal. … Department Licenses & Inspections Rep., ‘‘Housing Code Enforcement’’ (Dec. 24, 1958).
387 U.S. 541
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.