Documents

Oral argument — Mark Tamosiunas v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2018

That's not what the act is supposing. … We're going to quickly clean this up. The union didn't. So if you're going to go to the after the fact, all you're doing is making your case worse. Because Hyatt protected itself.

Oral argument — Sue White v. DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2018

It's a real estate agent who has authority to act as a real estate agent and facilitate the move out from a property it's managing. That's all that is. She says in her own email, I'm not a lawyer. … That four-year period had not yet expired when judgment was entered in the second proceeding.

Oral argument — Paul Solomon v. Lockheed Martin Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2017

The Naval Air Systems Command participated in the audit. … And the Court faced specifically the question of whether there was a difference from the period when they were acting as private contractors from the time that they were acting as government employees.

Oral argument — United States v. Ronqueize Head and Seronte Newby

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2020

acts. … Do you have any comment on that? Yes, Judge. I believe that the First Circuit has addressed this argument recently.

Oral argument — David Estrada-Escamilla v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2022

Okay, because I think your motion as worded was just a clean remand. Yes, Your Honor. Thank you, Counsel. Mr. Jacobs, you have about three minutes left. Thank you. … It lingers there for a long period of time. This case has been at the Ninth Circuit for over two years. There's been multiple extension requests.

Oral argument — Dean Dairy Holdings v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2016

If it's inevitable, or if an act of daily living could cause this, then it's not compensable. The case doubles that. … So, I mean, there was no – I mean, the order was he failed to prove no compensation, period. And that was affirmed and adopted by the Commission. That is what the order said? Yes, Mr. Justice.

Oral argument — Labor Network v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2019

The Utilization Review was submitted, and that Utilization Review found that that therapy, in that period of time, was not provided to relieve or cure the effects of that injury. … As soon as he said it was going to take an hour-long walk to get on it, she'd be working the garden, she'd be working at the racetrack, cleaning up the floor of the bathroom.

Oral argument — Galvan v. Barnhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2004

The ALJ, I respectfully submit, did what I call acting as an expert witness. The ALJ said, well, there's no medically determinable reasons why Dr. Nolan should reach this conclusion. … So then if that's the case, why is it reversible that the ALJ decided to give greater weight to McKinsey's as he treated the Petitioner over a very long period of time? Two reasons.

Oral argument — Howard v. IELRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2026

I mean, it's plain language in the collective bargaining agreement that when they transfer from one unit to another, they're on this probationary period. … To the extent the court wishes to consider this argument at all, I want to make a couple, a few comments about it. The unfair labor practice charge cited only section 14A1.

Oral argument — J. Robert van Faassen, LLM v. Greg Lindberg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2025

I won't comment. Well, I think I know where you're going, Your Honor. So we should create a new circuit split that might result in us getting reversed? … Yeah, the North Carolina Foreign Judgment Recognition Act. Now, I don't know, and what I don't know is this part.

Oral argument — Charles Ford v. Verisign, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2009

When she asked the question, what's the need for expedition, the plaintiffs have said that the answer to that question AT&T gave was, well, there are business reasons, period. … I think that number was pulled out of thin air, Your Honor. There's nothing in the record to support it. What's your thin air number? What should we be looking at?

Oral argument — United States v. Jason Wright

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2010

And that's not only in the individual comments by the Congressman, but it's also in the Senate report. … And so as the cases I laid out in the supplemental brief say, it's not enough just to kind of throw something up in the air.

Oral argument — Thomas Balke v. Don Carmichael

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2020

If anybody can designate and that has to be taken, period, end of story, why do we even have E? … All of the hearings air audio recorded, but they are available for the court to listen to.

Oral argument — People v. Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2014

So the court comments that the plea that was presented was an open plea. They're not disingenuous. … Because even an erroneous ruling or an erroneous act by a judge does not by itself demonstrate prejudice or bias.

Oral argument — United States v. Kenneth Sandidge

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2014

We believe that all of that shows the district court acted improperly, both as to assessing the enhancement and to take away the acceptance of responsibility. … The district court also commented on the defendant's inconsistencies and finding that he was not credible.

Oral argument — Williams v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2026

But let's assume that it's clean, pure as the driven snow. Does the fact that he has a 20-year-old DUI make him dangerous? I think it very well might. … And we know there's going to be 90 days for comment. What the final rule will look like after those comments, anyone's guess. I mean, but from your argument, it sounds like no one can use 925C.

Oral argument — United States v. Bignon

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2020

That should not be sufficient because these, these acts, you know, even if officer Stewart and his experience believe that there was suspicious, they are totally consistent with innocent behavior. … So if they had a document labeled inventory search, big non backpack, and it says random contents, no gun, no gold, no valuables, period, would that would that satisfy the requirement?

Oral argument — Thomas Deskins v. City of Bremerton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2010

Deskins to put his hands in the air after he got out of the car, and he told Mr. Deskins to turn away from the officer, and he did, within two to three seconds. … He was going about 50 miles an hour during this time period. So we're talking about over a two-minute time period where Mr. Deskin's did not obey the police officer. And we know that Mr.

Oral argument — Nicopure Labs, LLC v. FDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2018

But this is a little bit different because it's only during this grace period, this transition period, that the sale is lawful. Yeah, but you cannot suspend the First Amendment for two years. … And so you're not talking about starting on a clean slate every time.

Oral argument — Taylor Sheet Metal, Inc. v. SMART Local No. 16

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2019

In that case, as in this case, the parties entered into a pre-hire agreement under Section 8F of the Act. … That turns the National Labor Relations Act rule on its head.