Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.29s
Oral argument — Mussi v. Fontes
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2026
So the Supreme Court didn't say, you need to prove that it's certainty that these third parties will act unlawfully. … We have evidence at each stage of the chain that I've talked about repeatedly, but in Clapper, for example, there were clean breaks. On an evidentiary record, there were clean breaks in the chain.
39 min of audioOral argument — Augustin v. City of Phila
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017
You clean that up pretty quickly, right? You either bring the account current, or if there's a mistake, you go to court, and you get the mistake fixed, right? Yes. … There was a one-year period where, in fact, that's what they were doing from 2009 to 2010. But then they started trying to get it to the actual owner in a rather befuddled way, but they tried.
40 min of audioOral argument — POSCO v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2019
In this case, we put on the record the system marginal price, the marginal price, the variable cost of electricity that's on KPX's schedule for the period of review. … This is for the period that's under review? Correct, Your Honor. Correct, Your Honor. In fact, well, I can direct Your Honor to the actual appendix site where you can find it.
26 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Porter
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2019
And here, the unconditional plea was taken months before the allegedly ambiguous comments. They wouldn't, so the comments wouldn't have affected the, your client's decision to take the plea. … Period.
31 min of audioOral argument — Anthony Mathis v. Terra Renewal Services, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2023
The hissing noise was it escaping, and the air escaping, and it would go away by itself. … I think you could put a period at the end of this case at that point because that's contributory negligence right there coming from the plaintiff's mouth.
50 min of audioOral argument — Iowa Pork Producers Association v. Rob Bonta
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2024
there was a cost of compliance issue on prop 12 that was made before that didn't seem to go anywhere yes you're not so you're not making that argument so let me let me clarify just if I can make one comment … And so now we're back here drawing on a clean slate. And you're saying you didn't do anything because you didn't have to and now if you have to, then you want six years.
51 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Michael Swanson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2017
Rosman requires that the intent, as opposed to the affirmative act, in aiding and abetting liability, go to the entire scope of the crime. … Alexander as the bad person and that he's the innocent guy trying to clean everything up. It's the only way I can read them.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Curtin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2006
There was a period where there were being stories that were underlying. … He incorporated them into his chats and into his acts. And in specific, he, the stories, many of the stories talked about little girls when they get their periods, whether they can get pregnant.
63 min of audioOral argument — Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2010
In 2005, Congress passed the Bankruptcy Act. It made a policy decision to limit judicial discretion on a case-by-case basis in the area of reasonable and necessary expenses. … Food, clothing, house cleaning supplies, those are part of the national standards.
58 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Aaron Thorpe
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2024
So I think that there, the Rule 33 provides a three-year time period for a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence. … And when the prosecution continues in the sense that the government has some control to agree to relief during that time period.
58 min of audioOral argument — Joseph Wilborn v. David Ealey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2017
Major Reese examined him enough to know that he had been pepper sprayed, meaning he got a clean look at his face, and Mr. … I would also like to point out that the district court heard testimony and argument over a period of two days.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Horton
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2025
When he is released after that period, which we assume, and it's negative comment on the prison system to say, after he gets out, maybe he's still a user 20 years later, he is tested. … And then to say, look, and after a year or something, he comes to me and he's clean and he can have a lawyer come and tell me how well he's been performing, then, you know, the district court, as all district
30 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Jun 27, 2017
What I'm saying is that I think that the decision maker, and I think he testified to this, wanted to clean house. I don't think there's any question about that. … And she was kept on for some period to allow her to do this, right? And she didn't do it. And she didn't do it. And so our point...
31 min of audioOral argument — City of New York v. Natl Railroad Passenger Corp.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 24, 2014
You had made a comment before about the Supreme Court determining that the Rail Act was not an exercise of eminent domain power, but I thought the Rail Act actually said that it was in part enacted as … There's no evidence that Congress intended the fresh start for a clean slate policy here to wipe out the covenants running with the land.
41 min of audioOral argument — Johnnie Savory v. William Cannon, Sr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2019
And so in Illinois, if you're in custody, you can file a successive post-conviction petition under that act. … But do you think, though, in keeping with your comments here, can you identify any case along along the lines of the rule that you're advancing that would require overruling?
62 min of audioOral argument — DeNofrio v. DVA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2019
Struthers to continue to act as a physician. In, in addition to that, Mr. … And that is that we had three management people, after my client became a whistleblower, make comments that were very, very similar. And that is Mr.
21 min of audioOral argument — AVEDIAN v. ASHCROFT
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2004
And then after that, as she did not have a she had a period of not being disturbed. But it's after she left that she has the concerns. … In its decision, the board noted that it had considered petitioner's brief and even commented that it had been a well-reasoned brief.
25 min of audioOral argument — Gun Owners of America Inc v. Merrick Garland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2021
There's nothing in the Gun Control Act or the National Firearms Act that gives ATF the authority to decide that certain weapons are machine guns. Do you have to get there? … Isn't that part of the delegation that enables notice and comment to be made public? I mean, there were 186,000 comments on this, so clearly there was notice and comment.
46 min of audioOral argument — Dyamond Davis v. Illinois Department of Human S
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2023
This case involves the interpretation of the Family Medical Leave Act. The issues presented are as follows. … So you've got an employee in pay period one, pay period two, pay period three, inaccurately records their time. Attempting to get paid for time, vacation time that the employee does not have.
37 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Holena
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2018
Holina has raised, and specifically to pick up on a point that the government addressed in its brief about the apparent inconsistencies in the district court's imposition of the Special Conditions Act … It makes sense to clean it up now rather than to wait for squabbling over which of the terms he's violated. There's conflict in there.
33 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.