Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

2.29s

  • Oral argument — Mussi v. Fontes

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2026

    So the Supreme Court didn't say, you need to prove that it's certainty that these third parties will act unlawfully. … We have evidence at each stage of the chain that I've talked about repeatedly, but in Clapper, for example, there were clean breaks. On an evidentiary record, there were clean breaks in the chain.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Augustin v. City of Phila

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017

    You clean that up pretty quickly, right? You either bring the account current, or if there's a mistake, you go to court, and you get the mistake fixed, right? Yes. … There was a one-year period where, in fact, that's what they were doing from 2009 to 2010. But then they started trying to get it to the actual owner in a rather befuddled way, but they tried.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — POSCO v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2019

    In this case, we put on the record the system marginal price, the marginal price, the variable cost of electricity that's on KPX's schedule for the period of review. … This is for the period that's under review? Correct, Your Honor. Correct, Your Honor. In fact, well, I can direct Your Honor to the actual appendix site where you can find it.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Porter

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2019

    And here, the unconditional plea was taken months before the allegedly ambiguous comments. They wouldn't, so the comments wouldn't have affected the, your client's decision to take the plea. … Period.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Anthony Mathis v. Terra Renewal Services, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2023

    The hissing noise was it escaping, and the air escaping, and it would go away by itself. … I think you could put a period at the end of this case at that point because that's contributory negligence right there coming from the plaintiff's mouth.

    50 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Iowa Pork Producers Association v. Rob Bonta

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2024

    there was a cost of compliance issue on prop 12 that was made before that didn't seem to go anywhere yes you're not so you're not making that argument so let me let me clarify just if I can make one comment … And so now we're back here drawing on a clean slate. And you're saying you didn't do anything because you didn't have to and now if you have to, then you want six years.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Michael Swanson

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2017

    Rosman requires that the intent, as opposed to the affirmative act, in aiding and abetting liability, go to the entire scope of the crime. … Alexander as the bad person and that he's the innocent guy trying to clean everything up. It's the only way I can read them.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Curtin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2006

    There was a period where there were being stories that were underlying. … He incorporated them into his chats and into his acts. And in specific, he, the stories, many of the stories talked about little girls when they get their periods, whether they can get pregnant.

    63 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2010

    In 2005, Congress passed the Bankruptcy Act. It made a policy decision to limit judicial discretion on a case-by-case basis in the area of reasonable and necessary expenses. … Food, clothing, house cleaning supplies, those are part of the national standards.

    58 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Aaron Thorpe

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2024

    So I think that there, the Rule 33 provides a three-year time period for a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence. … And when the prosecution continues in the sense that the government has some control to agree to relief during that time period.

    58 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Joseph Wilborn v. David Ealey

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2017

    Major Reese examined him enough to know that he had been pepper sprayed, meaning he got a clean look at his face, and Mr. … I would also like to point out that the district court heard testimony and argument over a period of two days.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Horton

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2025

    When he is released after that period, which we assume, and it's negative comment on the prison system to say, after he gets out, maybe he's still a user 20 years later, he is tested. … And then to say, look, and after a year or something, he comes to me and he's clean and he can have a lawyer come and tell me how well he's been performing, then, you know, the district court, as all district

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Eileen Schuman, John Brock, Susan Noe v. Lee County Board of County Commissioners, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, d.b.a. Lee County

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 27, 2017

    What I'm saying is that I think that the decision maker, and I think he testified to this, wanted to clean house. I don't think there's any question about that. … And she was kept on for some period to allow her to do this, right? And she didn't do it. And she didn't do it. And so our point...

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — City of New York v. Natl Railroad Passenger Corp.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 24, 2014

    You had made a comment before about the Supreme Court determining that the Rail Act was not an exercise of eminent domain power, but I thought the Rail Act actually said that it was in part enacted as … There's no evidence that Congress intended the fresh start for a clean slate policy here to wipe out the covenants running with the land.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Johnnie Savory v. William Cannon, Sr.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2019

    And so in Illinois, if you're in custody, you can file a successive post-conviction petition under that act. … But do you think, though, in keeping with your comments here, can you identify any case along along the lines of the rule that you're advancing that would require overruling?

    62 min of audio
  • Oral argument — DeNofrio v. DVA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2019

    Struthers to continue to act as a physician. In, in addition to that, Mr. … And that is that we had three management people, after my client became a whistleblower, make comments that were very, very similar. And that is Mr.

    21 min of audio
  • Oral argument — AVEDIAN v. ASHCROFT

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2004

    And then after that, as she did not have a she had a period of not being disturbed. But it's after she left that she has the concerns. … In its decision, the board noted that it had considered petitioner's brief and even commented that it had been a well-reasoned brief.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gun Owners of America Inc v. Merrick Garland

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2021

    There's nothing in the Gun Control Act or the National Firearms Act that gives ATF the authority to decide that certain weapons are machine guns. Do you have to get there? … Isn't that part of the delegation that enables notice and comment to be made public? I mean, there were 186,000 comments on this, so clearly there was notice and comment.

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Dyamond Davis v. Illinois Department of Human S

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2023

    This case involves the interpretation of the Family Medical Leave Act. The issues presented are as follows. … So you've got an employee in pay period one, pay period two, pay period three, inaccurately records their time. Attempting to get paid for time, vacation time that the employee does not have.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Holena

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2018

    Holina has raised, and specifically to pick up on a point that the government addressed in its brief about the apparent inconsistencies in the district court's imposition of the Special Conditions Act … It makes sense to clean it up now rather than to wait for squabbling over which of the terms he's violated. There's conflict in there.

    33 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.