Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters1999

10,000+ results

1.59s

  • Plantiffs Brief — CHICAGO & C. RY. CO. v. Pub. Utilities Comm.

    Supreme Court brief · Plantiffs Brief · 1917

    S., 352, 399, See also: Mondouv. N. Y.,N. H. & H.R. R. Co., 223 U. 8, 1, 47, 54, 55. aa. … (Trans., 24, 25; Rec., 105, 106.)

    242 U.S. 333
  • Cite as 24 I&N Dec. 452 (BIA 2008)

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    I&N Dec. 382, 399 (BIA 2007) (Pauley, concurring) (“[T]he upshot of the approach adopted by the Court [in Lopez] is that the penalty assigned by the State to a drug offense is irrelevant; it is the hypothetical … See generally Matter of Babaisakov, 24 I&N Dec. 306 (BIA 2007). 458

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Opposition Brief — Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior Court of the City of San Francisco

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

    Be ok Oe ee JAN 18 399] \ >>) JOSEPH F. SPANIOL, JR. … See, e.g., 12 U.S.C. § 24, (Seventh) (“board of directors or awy authorized officers or agents”). [Emphasis added].

    498 U.S. 1089
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Triplett v. Illinois

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1971

    Harris, TM. 24, 963 NE. 24 35 Petitioner Frank Triplett prays that a writ of certio- Tari issue te review the judgment of Supreme Court of Umow affirming the trial court of attempt rape. … Davis (2d eir. 1968), 399 F. 2d 948, cert, denied 393 U.S. 987.)

    401 U.S. 955
  • Opposition — Berger v. Personal Products, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1991

    Tambrands, Inc., 399 S.E.2d 208 (Ga. 1991). … Mo. 1990) STATE COURTS 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. Berger v. Personal Products, Inc., 115 Wash. 2d 267, 797 P.2d 1148 (Wash. 1990) Poloney v. Tambrands, Inc., 399 S.E.2d 208 (Ga. 1991) Craig v.

    499 U.S. 961
  • Opposition Brief — Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC, Petitioner v. Mylan, Inc., et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Mar 8, 2023

    Nashville Coal Co., 365 U.S. 320 (1961) ........... 10, 14, 20, 23-24, 30, 33 United States v. Dentsply Int’l, Inc., 399 F.3d 181 (3d Cir. 2005) ............................ 26, 32 United States v. … If, unlike here, a restraint forecloses enough of the market, courts ana- 24 lyze its “‘probable effect” on “the relevant area of effective competition’ and ‘the probable immediate and future effects

  • Opposition Brief — Warren v. City of Lincoln

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989

    RS a 21 23 24 26 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Adams v. United States, 399 F.2d 574 (D.C. Cir. Us fils oe Sed Cee eka ee EERE REE RN 11 Anderson v. … Mo.) aff’d BOG F.2 1G0F GO OO, BTS oi sink cas se sca ds 24 Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982)...... 16, 19, 24 Heine v. Connelly, 644 F.Supp. 1508 (D.C. Del. 1986) .... 13 Kirby v.

    490 U.S. 1091
  • Reply Brief — Mandel v. En Banc Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1980

    Wkrs., 294:°F.2d 399, 400 (2d. Cir. 1961). In Farrand Optical :Co., Inc. v. … Opp. 24).

    445 U.S. 959
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Mobilize the Message, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 10, 2023

    Larosa, 796 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2015) ................................ 16 Citizens United v. Fed. … Larosa, 796 F.3d 399, 405 (4th Cir. 2015); accord Barr, 140 S. Ct. at 2356; see also Pet. at 24.

  • Opposition Brief — Nancy Catherine Powers, Petitioner v. Alabama

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Aug 12, 2022

    App. 1991)........... 24 State v. Wenzel, 399 P.3d 145 (Idaho Ct. App. 2017) ................... 13 United States v. … Wenzel, 13 162 Idaho 474, 476, 399 P.3d 145, 147 (Idaho Ct.

  • Appellees Brief — Larson v. Valente

    Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1982

    A-24, and was un- constitutional, id. … State, 299 N.C. 399, 411, 263 S.E.2d 726, 737 (1980).

    456 U.S. 228
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Paul Anthony Ashby, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 28, 2021

    And it is quite 24 55a Appendix D How would he possibly know that . . . somebody was in that basement when it happened? Defendant Ashby told him. … To the contrary, a D.C. court may not instruct the jury on a theory of this United States, 399 A.2d 21, 25 (D.C. 1979) (emphasis added).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Stephen Todd Booker, Petitioner v. Florida

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 27, 2018

    Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 427-31 (1986) (O’Connor, J., concurring) (liberty interest in meaningful state competency proceedings); Ohio Adult Parole Auth. v. … State, 218 So. 3d 399, 400 (Fla. 2017)(sentence final in 1993; see Gaskin v. Florida, 510 U.S. 925 (1993)). 10 041a which became final prior to Ring.

  • Respondents Brief — United States v. Scott

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1977

    Sisson, 399 U.S. 267 ......... 7,10,11,12,14,15 United States v. … (Br. 25). 24 Petitioner relies on Fed. R. Crim. P. 1 2(e) to support its petition by saying that the judge erred in deciding the motion after jeopardy attached.

    434 U.S. 889
  • Opposition — O'Grady v. Oberhand

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1990

    Dollinger, 471 A.2d 405, 95 N.J. 399 (1984) Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S. Ct. 822, 9 L. Ed. 2d, 837 ee or we oo b 8b Ab wwe wee 14 Ford v. … I believe that the jury had all of the evidence. [4/24T18:19 24; see Petitioners’ Appendix at p. I4a.] .. .

    495 U.S. 918
  • Opposition Brief — Washington v. CSC Credit Services, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000

    Information Dynamics, Ltd., 399 F. Supp. 1092, 1096-97 (D. … Jd. at 523-24. The court further held that allowing the plaintiff union to seek such a declaration did not conflict with the reasons for limiting injunctive relief under the Clayton Act.

    530 U.S. 1261
  • Petitioners Brief — May v. Midwest Refining Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1941

    Ed., 399. Old Colony Trust Co. v. Comm. of Int. Rev., 69 Fed. (2d) 699, 702 (C. C. A. 1st Cire.) Majestic Co. v. Orpheum Circuit, Inc., 21 Fed. (2d) 720, 724 (C. C. … A. 8th Cire.) and cases cited. 24 _ Vr aem wee bisa Pital. So CR te IDC se SEITE MLE AED LAE Ne Eh! CS AGERE DID * Ulmer et al. v. Lime Rock R. R. Co., 98 Me., 579; 57 Atl, 1001.

    314 U.S. 668
  • Opposition Brief — Rockstead v. City of Crystal Lake (No. 06-1716)

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007

    Ww” No. 06-1716 CO | we 24 Petitioners, CITY OF CRYSTAL LAKE, ILLINOIS, Respondent. … Rosenthal, 399 Ul. 247, 251, 77 N.E.2d 697 (Ill. 1948).

  • Respondents Brief — Friends of Merrymeeting Bay, et al., Petitioners v. Central Maine Power Company

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jun 8, 2022

    Arizona, 567 U.S. at 399. … Myrick, 514 U.S. 280, 287 (1995); see Arizona, 567 U.S. at 399-400.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Grutter v. Bollinger

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

    Metropolitan Areas,in 1 AmericaBecoming ~- 399, 401 (Neil J. Smelser et al. eds., 2001). … Barresi, 402 U.S. 39, 41(1971); Bakke, 438 U.S. at 399.

    539 U.S. 306

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.