Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Razham Broadnax

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2015

Was the Sex Act consensual? Yes, it was. Well, 288 is a nonconsensual act with a 14-year-old. There's no consent involved. All right? … The rap sheet, period. All of it. For showing — showing what? All the offenses? Did it show both the 261 and the 288?

Oral argument — United States v. Kaniadakis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2005

under these coding charges, were indeed, we believe, other acts under 404B. … Went in, did a condolectomy, cleaned up the head of the bones, removed material, sewed it back up to show him the x-rays. There's no condolectomy performed on that toe.

Oral argument — Sanders v. Iancu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 30, 2019

The air that we believe occurred in the below court was twofold. … And so as far as the actual applicant, she acted with diligence in this case.

Oral argument — DICKSON v. CHASEMELLON

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2005

If she had, and that's what she acted on. The problem was that over here was an opinion letter that was never looked at in this process at all. … That finding is a clean finding. It is not infected by reasonableness, which has to do with whether the transfer was rightful or not.

Oral argument — 05-77269, 06-73290 - Abuhawa v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2010

Mabuhaywa couldn't be credible because he was coming into the country to study, excuse me, air airline or air carrier maintenance. … And I would like that comment not to pertain to 100 percent of the board. I think I said most. Thank you.

Oral argument — Richard Valle v. 3M Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 27, 2023

You're just saying, in the sense of race judicata, you're just saying let the bankruptcy court decide everything on a clean slate, right? … I'm just saying I don't have a good enough picture of 3M's financials to comment on its solvency for these purposes.

Oral argument — United States v. Chad Camou

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2013

There is technology that allows certain advanced phones to be wiped clean from some distance. … How typical on this cheap of a phone is that someone would have the ability to come in and wipe a memory clean? I don't know how cheap this phone was, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Price

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2008

For marijuana, though, I would imagine that nine baggies and 6.2 grams could sustain someone for a fairly lengthy period of time. … You know, the best way to try a case is do it clean and right and fast. And, Your Honor, I believe that was done here.

Oral argument — Tovar-Reyes v. Blanche

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2026

In O'Reilly, the timing period was that faro order, which is a different type of administrative order, and that's the actual instrument that orders removal, not the later cat determinations, which for … Garland stating that Loper-Bright doesn't wipe the slate clean and that this court still has to respect its prior precedent.

Oral argument — Blanca Vasquez-Dominguez v. Robert Wilkinson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2021

So I submit that the BIA was clearly aired. … So that's about a two year period that we're talking about there.

Oral argument — Northwest Technical Resources Inc v. Hanford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2005

The reservation is being cleaned up, that they had a contract, and, you know, it goes on and on. … But they're not supposed to compete with the company, which is NTR, after they leave for the period of the non-competition.

Oral argument — United States v. Robert George

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2021

It's she flies several feet in the air, correct? That is correct. … You don't have to comment on the affidavit part of that. And the fact that he has a federal public defender, maybe the government would like to comment on that.

Oral argument — Slice v. Ferriter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2011

that does not immunize the subordinate from acting with retaliatory intent. … However, They all occurred within an approximate period of time from that fact, did they not? That may be, but at the time that Ms.

Oral argument — United States v. Diaz Diaz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2023

That's over a period of days in early March. … It's where it's acts, encouragement, support, or presence.

Oral argument — B.W. v. Austin Indep School Dist

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2024

And here, we're here today to talk about discrimination based upon race, pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. But it is not about political hurt. … Sometimes there's a rain, and the rain just clears the air, and you wake up the next morning, and it's fresh and sunny. It's a new day.

Oral argument — United States v. Robert Rasheed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2018

Actually, Your Honor, for the Sherman Act, I don't think we even need to show that. … It's not a conspiracy that can exist for any period of time.

Oral argument — United States v. Christopher McGee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2017

while in possession of a firearm and it specifically decided the heightened heightened need for deterrence in this case that is that the defendant had a lengthy criminal history in state court in a short period … arguments whatever is in dispute but even pushing that all to the side relying on other factors i would still give the same sentence for x y and z reasons that's not what happened here the record is not that clean

Oral argument — Walch v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2018

So a bee reader looks at this, and when he says zero over zero, he doesn't mean clean as a baby's butt. He just means, I don't think that what I see is from CWP. … My comment is not, oh, they were wrong in the way they weighed the evidence. It is that the basis for that weighing was wrong.

Oral argument — United States v. Porter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2019

And here, the unconditional plea was taken months before the allegedly ambiguous comments. They wouldn't, so the comments wouldn't have affected the, your client's decision to take the plea. … Period.

Oral argument — Televisa, S. A. de C.V v. DTVLA WC, INC.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2003

And in clause, in section 22.2.8, after two, three pages of text about the arbitration clause, the parties then threw in a final comment. … That is over the air with rabbit ear antennas. That's all that they had the right to do. But Televisa also had an affiliation with a satellite network.