Documents

Oral argument — Taxpayers and 101 E. Crossroads, LLC v. Weber

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2015

So notice is more of an information act, right? That's the way the statute appears to be written, Justice. … All they had to do was pick a number out of the air, stick it in there, and they had a state's attorney who said, okay, fine.

Oral argument — Marsh v. Chas Kurz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2024

As a wiper, he was responsible for sweeping and cleaning up asbestos-torn gaskets, torn-up packing, blankets, and loose packing. … That was a Jones Act and a General Maritime Law because the plaintiff brought claims under the Jones Act and unseaworthiness, and in that case they decided that the plaintiff did meet the higher standard

Oral argument — Ovedo-Chavez v. Bondi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2025

That was when his briefing schedule was due on November, where there was literally a clean slate in the Ninth Circuit, where the Ninth Circuit said, we do not know what the rule is and we're going to hold … It says here he did not meet his burden of proof for withholding of removal under the act or for CAT.

Oral argument — Tatarinov-Valereveich v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2006

I mean, a person goes and gets a green card, and then goes through all the hoops, which are considerable, and the background investigation, and you have to, of course, at the time, you have to have a clean … same question, the reason would have been because this fact pattern is very compelling in the opinion of a third of the panel, because we know, if we want to believe the record, why he committed the acts

Oral argument — James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2019

It has to be a connection to an act. … If you were writing, we're on a clean slate, we have no Barthel nothing, we're writing on a clean slate about what does relating to add, what does it add?

Oral argument — Ariel Schlosser v. VRHabilis LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2024

Do you have a comment on that case? Well, I did read that case, and for one, it's factually different in quite a few ways. But on that one, as I understood the court's opinion on that, as Mr. … And then the four, as far as the discrete acts that they're referring to, there were apparently four acts, but they occurred over a four to five year time period, and the court said that that just simply

Oral argument — Steven Aquino v. Alejandro Mayorkas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2021

And the court disagreed and said the 45 days ran from the discrete act, which was when the accommodations were denied. … Well, I mean, the real problem here is that you have a 45-day period. The usual period for a Title VII case is, I think, six months. So it's not unworkable. Everybody else seems to work under it.

Oral argument — Sanders v. Iancu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 30, 2019

The air that we believe occurred in the below court was twofold. … And so as far as the actual applicant, she acted with diligence in this case.

Oral argument — AVEDIAN v. ASHCROFT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2004

And then after that, as she did not have a she had a period of not being disturbed. But it's after she left that she has the concerns. … In its decision, the board noted that it had considered petitioner's brief and even commented that it had been a well-reasoned brief.

Oral argument — United States v. Andre Watson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2021

Uh, do you, do you concede that it's under plain air review? … Why wouldn't that be, um, a basis for concluding that there was no plain air? Right.

Oral argument — United States v. Bignon

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2020

That should not be sufficient because these, these acts, you know, even if officer Stewart and his experience believe that there was suspicious, they are totally consistent with innocent behavior. … So if they had a document labeled inventory search, big non backpack, and it says random contents, no gun, no gold, no valuables, period, would that would that satisfy the requirement?

Oral argument — Emmerich Nwspr v. Particle Media

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2026

During the glitch period, help me understand why that violated the Copyright Act under the terms that we've been talking about, transmit, copy, fixed. … Emmerich may clean things off his website eventually, but not in this timeframe.

Oral argument — United States v. Grant (Reichberg)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2020

I'd like to hear your comments also about whether any favoritism was shown other than possibly in timing, even if we conceive of it as an official act. … But here, the government, in some sense, was in a position in which we knew the responsiveness review would take quite some time, a period of many months.

Oral argument — Richard Valle v. 3M Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 27, 2023

You're just saying, in the sense of race judicata, you're just saying let the bankruptcy court decide everything on a clean slate, right? … I'm just saying I don't have a good enough picture of 3M's financials to comment on its solvency for these purposes.

Oral argument — United States v. Seminole

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2026

asked trial defense counsel and the prosecutor any questions or concerns and they said nope no judge good to go here so you're saying well we don't have the burden to show prejudice but this is on plain air … that his rights are somehow violated that this jury was somehow anything but impartial and the court in trying to figure out what to do this court explained in McVeigh that there's a careful balancing act

Oral argument — Dyamond Davis v. Illinois Department of Human S

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2023

This case involves the interpretation of the Family Medical Leave Act. The issues presented are as follows. … So you've got an employee in pay period one, pay period two, pay period three, inaccurately records their time. Attempting to get paid for time, vacation time that the employee does not have.

Oral argument — Korenica v. Barnhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2006

And if you file an appeal even before that period of the Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4, it says if you file an appeal even before that period of time, you're not prejudiced. … And why shouldn't we allow the district court to go ahead and clean up that issue, which is clearly an appropriate thing to do, and then let us review the case?

Oral argument — Lawson v. Spirit Aerosystems

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2022

Are they connected with Arconic because they did an adverse act? That would be ridiculous. That is nothing to be protected. And all that Mr. Elliott did was adverse acts. And he didn't get the job. … And I just want to comment. I just thought the briefing for both sides and the arguments today were excellent on both sides. So I commend all counsel. This matter will be submitted.

Oral argument — Aaron Killgore v. Specpro Professional Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2022

Let's not have anybody sign that or Army, Air Force. … So that suggests to me that it's not only the completed act of signing an assessment, but also the prospective act of signing an assessment if the belief is there, the reasonable belief that that may violate

Oral argument — United States v. Juvenile Male

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2006

And the second concerns the divergent goals between the Sentencing Reform Act and the Juvenile Delinquency Act. … The policy behind the Juvenile Delinquency Act is clear.