Documents

Oral argument — Angie Cowan Hamada v. Laborforce, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2026

That went on for an extended period of time and then it accepted this tainted petition. And now the entire plant has lost its union. … That choice is protected by the National Labor Relations Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Christopher McGee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2017

while in possession of a firearm and it specifically decided the heightened heightened need for deterrence in this case that is that the defendant had a lengthy criminal history in state court in a short period … arguments whatever is in dispute but even pushing that all to the side relying on other factors i would still give the same sentence for x y and z reasons that's not what happened here the record is not that clean

Oral argument — United States v. Aaron Thorpe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2024

So I think that there, the Rule 33 provides a three-year time period for a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence. … And when the prosecution continues in the sense that the government has some control to agree to relief during that time period.

Oral argument — Tovar-Reyes v. Blanche

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2026

In O'Reilly, the timing period was that faro order, which is a different type of administrative order, and that's the actual instrument that orders removal, not the later cat determinations, which for … Garland stating that Loper-Bright doesn't wipe the slate clean and that this court still has to respect its prior precedent.

Oral argument — Dept. of Education v. Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2023

The HEROES Act specifies that waivers and modifications issued under the HEROES Act are exempt from notice and comment. … In other words, it's not speculative in the question of how would that person be remedied, but it is another borrower you're asking for notice and comment, and during that period, if it's granted, it would

Oral argument — George Steen v. Leslie Dismukes

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2026

As well as after the period of concern, all of his sex behaviors exhibited were towards males. … Steen was done cleaning MS, he would hand MS out to Mrs. Steen, and she would go take him and get ready, and Mr. Steen would take a shower.

Oral argument — United States v. Price

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2008

For marijuana, though, I would imagine that nine baggies and 6.2 grams could sustain someone for a fairly lengthy period of time. … You know, the best way to try a case is do it clean and right and fast. And, Your Honor, I believe that was done here.

Oral argument — Fagbemi v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2014

Instead of that being done here, it seemed to be more of a situation was, well, you violated this rule, you didn't do this act, so boom, we're fined against you and we're firing you. … The argument is made that while slugs in the past occurred, but these are really tiny slugs and only a very, very short period of time, would the census get followed up?

Oral argument — Smith v. GSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2019

Smith absent is protected activity under the whistleblower protection act. … It's an ADA argument, I assume, Anti-Deficiency Act. Well, as I understand it, government employees are not supposed to work off the clock, period. Even if they want to donate their time, yeah.

Oral argument — Wilkins v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 30, 2022

Is the way we go about statutory interpretation today to wipe the slate clean and let's say we're going back to the beginning? … Because whether it's jurisdictional or not is up in the air. So we could settle this case.

Oral argument — Gordon Martin v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2022

And the other thing is if he worked in the air-conditioned or a heated environment, he had to get in his car in the garage and drive to his work and park and go into work. … The question is, did the ALJ act wholly without reason? And it is our contention that the ALJ did act reasonably.

Oral argument — Rep. of the Marshall Islands v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2017

The Tucker Act would not give them a cause of action, although they try to cast this as a type of a contract action. In fact, the Tucker Act would decry it. … I can't even think of any cases in which, it is hard to think of cases in which a foreign sovereign has come into court, period, about a treaty or about anything else.

Oral argument — United States v. Travis Job

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2016

I want you to comment on this. It may be a fine comment by the district court. It's on 645. … Do you have any — You want me to comment on the 600 months? You can comment on it, and then we're going to end. Okay.

Oral argument — 1-19-2255

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 29, 2020

Shaliga referred to, section 217C, was actually permitted the board to make that correction in the air. … Now at that point, and it's been commented a couple times, he's a lay person. There's no question that the Riverside, or I'm sorry, the River Forest Community Center could have been a participant.

Oral argument — Marlen Reza v. IGT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2009

So this is accommodate under which act you're talking about now? This is under the ADA, Your Honor. Under the ADA? ADA. Okay. … calls, and I believe it's on March 16th, talks to the doctor's assistant about the specific things that are in use on the assembly line, which is like a super glue, Loctite glue, and alcohol used for cleaning

Oral argument — United States v. Manraksa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003

Our contention is that the definition of knowingly by departing from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals model instructions and by allowing the evidence of failure to act to be equivalent to knowingly, … from December of 2000, January of 2001, after that she was basically clean as the snow and was not involved in any of this.

Oral argument — United States v. Er

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2018

Quashie was a member of a robbery ring that extended over 10 years, while the evidence, I'm sorry, while the charged, charges in the indictment only deal with a much shorter period, six, six months. … This other act evidence did not come in to show part of the conspiracy. The conspiracy was narrow. It was cabinded by the two robberies that were charged in the substantive acts.

Oral argument — DICKSON v. CHASEMELLON

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2005

If she had, and that's what she acted on. The problem was that over here was an opinion letter that was never looked at in this process at all. … That finding is a clean finding. It is not infected by reasonableness, which has to do with whether the transfer was rightful or not.

Oral argument — United States v. Keith Shrum

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2022

Shrum knew, if anything, what he was told or by whom, or if it is simply just this generic something's in the air, something's happening. … Shrum and the child without success for a period of time. Eventually, they find them back at the home. They had Mr.

Oral argument — Brownsteinv.Lindsay,etal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2013

I mean, the question of whether or not the district judge may order the cancellation of a copyright is one that's kind of up in the air. … I'm not sure whether he knew it or didn't know it really, because she acted in a manner that was consistent with the co-authorship.