Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Republican Senatorial Committee, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Election Commission, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 6, 2025

Since Citizens United, the number of serious bipartisan bills in the Senate on climate change, over a period of now more than fifteen years, is zero. 28 The before-and-after of dark money’s power could … That group is happy to brag about its influence, touting its message to candidates that if you support clean energy, “you do so at your political peril,” and crowing about its success: “The vast majority

Amicus Curiae Brief — Winston R. Anderson, et al., Petitioners v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 29, 2026

Around the same time, NBC News aired an investigatory documentary by Edwin Newman highlighting some of those stories for the public. … Their allocation in Intel’s 401(k) Savings Plan soared from almost nothing to 23 percent over about the same period. Id. at ⁋⁋ 129, 329.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

SESAC is one of three performing rights societies recognized under the Copyright Act. … As one commentator aptly put it: “Since when did unauthorized taking . . . become ‘sharing?’ . . .

Amicus Curiae Brief — MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc., ES Pe er a eee 20 International Medical Prosthetics Research Associates, Inc. v. … See Teva Pharmaceuticals, 395 F.3d at 1334 (majority opinion) (patentee “need not” sue declaratory plaintiff “immediately” because third party’s 180-day exclusivity period under Hatch-Waxman Act would

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tri-City ValleyCats, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. The Office of the Commissioner of Baseball

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 17, 2023

Ct. 2141, 2159 (2021); (“aberrational” (cleaned up)); Flood, 407 U.S. at 282 (an 5 “anomaly”); Haywood v. … MLBPA maintained its opposition to the baseball exemption throughout this period. It supported the lawsuit that led to this Court’s decision in Flood v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

alleging that respondents had violated the Sher- man Act, 15 U.S.C. | et seq., by conspiring during a fif- teen year period to “ ‘fix, raise and maintain prices and to inhibit or eliminate competition … (amending Federal Aviation Act of 1958 to “encourage, develop, and attain an air transportation system which relies on competitive market forces to determine the quality, variety, and price of air services

Amicus Curiae Brief — Norfolk Southern R. Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

In 1980 Congress adopted a new Motor Carrier Act mandating further deregulation. 4 During the period between 1980 and 1995, Congress enacted a series of laws which completely overhauled the regulatory … The liability of international air carriers is limited by treaty to the sum of $9.07 per pound. 49 U.S.C. §40105.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Palmer v. Thompson

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1971

secure 14 Jd., 1st Sess., 1200. 15 Jd., at 1202-3. 21 to the oppressed slave his natural and God-given rights . .. a right to live, and live in a state of freedom ... a right to breath the free air … It is not contended that the amendment itself reaches every act implying the inferiority of the black man. Purely private acts may be beyond its scope. See Ferguson v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Peter B. Chiafalo, Levi Jennet Guerra, and Esther Virginia John, Petitioners v. Washington

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 8, 2020

Period dictionaries identify both broad and narrow accepted usages of the terms “elector,” “vote” and “ballot.” … serve as an elector limited to what Article II, Section 1 expressly permits, then states could not impose further, sensible eligibility criteria such as residency, age, competency, party affiliation or a clean

Amicus Curiae Brief — Al Odah v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

The Judicial Branch Has A Duty To Act As A Check On The Executive Branch, a Os bee oe 6d 8 B. … The Judicial Branch Has A Duty To Act As A Check On The Executive Branch, Even In Wartime.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Poliner v. Texas Health Health Systems Systems (No. 08-543)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

Rodgers, “Comment: Procedural Pro- tections During Medical Peer Review: A Rein- terpretation of the Health Care Quality Im- provement Act of 1986,” 111 Penn St. L. Rev. … Rodgers, “Comment: Procedural Protec: tions During Medical Peer Review: A Reinterpreta- tion of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986,” 111 Penn St. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 923 (2018) (No. 17-965)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Where a factory unlawfully pollutes the air, may a district court enjoin the pollution? … American Law Institute, Principles of the Law of Ag- gregate Litigation § 2.04 comment a (2010). The government thus errs in asserting that there is something “troubling” (U.S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Ins. Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1988) ..passim Standard Oil of California v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1%).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

Therefore, during a 12-month period, tnese four Trust Funds alone processed a total of 455,832 health and welfare claims and received 723 pension applica- tions. … Northwest Air- lines v. Transport Workers Union, 451 U.S. 77 (1981); see also, Texas Industries v. Radcliffe, 451 U.S. 630 (1981).

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Scheffer

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

x 5 Vv Legal Periodicals: B. … The polygraph examination was done by the Air Force Office of Special Intelligence [AFOSI].

Amicus Curiae Brief — Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

App. 15a (commenting on the 1948 revisions of the Hobbs Act, which, according to the court of appeals were either “formal, stylistic changes” or “substantive changes, whether advert- ently or inadvertently … One of his books, Peacemaking Behind Bars, is an account of his time spent in jail for a 1993 action at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base in Goldsboro, N.C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kremen v. Maine

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

Place, 462 U.S. 696, 699 (1983) (seizure of an air passenger’s baggage for the purpose of conducting a canine sniff excessive, where bags were held for ninety minutes). … Numerous commentators have urged that race not play any routine role in investigative decisionmaking, for the burden of enduring intrusive police tactics almost inevitably falls upon the minority members

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

M/V Sky Reefer, 515 U.S. 528, 537 (1995); Air France v. Saks, 470 U.S. 392, 404 (1985); Sumitomo Shoji America v. … Compagnie Nationale Air France, 386 F.2d 323, 337-38 (5th Cir. 1967) (“A multilateral treaty is rather like a ‘uniform law’ within the United States.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, 138 S. Ct. 43 (2017) (No. 16-1276)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

No. 111-203, § 922(c), ee i aitccissetecenscdictinatintecadminintenenn 18 OTHER AUTHORITIES is BE Bee i air ceincaccctsteciccittnedndicentocummnion 13 INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE Amici curiae New England … And that administrative filing requirement is subject to a clipped 180-day limitations period. 18 U.S.C. § 1514A(b)(2)(D).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Manhattan Cmty. Access Corp. v. Halleck, 139 S. Ct. 360 (2018) (No. 17-1702)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

Cir. 2013): “In the two decades since Congress enacted the Cable Act of 1992, the video programming marketplace has radically transformed. … FCC, 520 U.S. 180 (1997), that “it is rare for |cable subscribers] ever to switch” from cable to over-the-air broadcast television, id. at 220 (quoting S. Rep.