Documents

Oral argument — Kenneth Daugherty v. Richard Harrington

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2018

That's the retaliatory act. That can't possibly be the protected speech that precedes the supposedly retaliatory act. Can't be both. I agree. … or failed to act despite that awareness.

Oral argument — Misty Simms v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2016

It's not as clean cut as that, though, because you don't even know how much you paid. You've got an idea of the percentage. … All these issues are up in the air, and that's just to be honest with you. I mean, I don't want you to leave here thinking, well, I made such a point.

Oral argument — Keith Stansell v. Samark Jose Lopez Bello

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2022

That the Florida statute acts almost like rule 56. … In this sort of scenario, I know the analogy is not clean, but the fact that...

Oral argument — April-Lee Williams v. MCImetro Access Transmission S

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2009

The second issue is whether the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, known as the TCPA, preempts this Washington statute. … Period. There's no opportunities for alternative results. It's clear that an ADAD is an ADAD for purposes of this statute.

Oral argument — James Head v. Eric Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2015

Williams wasn't written on a clean slate. We had led the way in Streeter. I agree with that. I think the court could view Streeter as a roadmap. … So still this court was not ready to act on that roadmap if, in fact, Streeter was.

Oral argument — B.W. v. Austin Indep School Dist

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2024

And here, we're here today to talk about discrimination based upon race, pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. But it is not about political hurt. … Sometimes there's a rain, and the rain just clears the air, and you wake up the next morning, and it's fresh and sunny. It's a new day.

Oral argument — Malak Khatabi v. Car Auto Holdings LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2025

So, like, Congress has, out of thin air, created a cause of action. And it has, out of thin air, established a box for what remedies for that cause of action exist. … Um, the, the caps were not under the Federal Tort Claim Act or the state common law of malpractice that was there.

Oral argument — Serge Haitayan v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2019

They worked for long periods of time. This isn't a plumber coming into your house on a one-time basis to fix your sink. … All right, you can make a 30-second comment.

Oral argument — Vermilion Coal Company v. Black Beauty Coal Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2009

I thought there was testimony from Keeney that there would be permanent damage to the mine, that there have to be operating machines that air it out and pump the water out. … Could you sue under the Franchise Disclosure Act, even though it's a statute because it's referenced in here? Could you do that in arbitration? Yes.

Oral argument — United States v. Ronald McKnight

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2019

The letter says the prosecutor is gassing myself through the air vents. And there is a conspiracy to entrap me into doing some inappropriate things so that they can charge me with a sex offense. … But as my colleague pointed out, the district judges, several of them, did get to observe this gentleman over a period of time in person. Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — People v. Martin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 23, 2017

But he essentially established himself to another witness that he wasn't in the house for the vast majority of the period when the complaint allegedly occurred. Yeah. … So I think that final paragraph, and then the committee comments say that. You know, the jury is free to accept, reject.

Oral argument — United States v. Chowdhury

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2024

Chowdhury acted, as the District Court found, quite deliberately. It was not an act of impulse the way that those other cases were. Here, the District Judge found it very persuasive that Mr. … My only point though, Your Honor, is just the comment that I just heard. I just wanted to just clean up just a little bit there. I'm not downplaying the dangerousness of it.

Oral argument — Thomas Navarro v. United States Center for SafeSport

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2025

I mean, the idea that somebody could be competing who has been doping, it's part of that effort to make the game clean. … So under the 1990 Victim of Child Abuse Act, that act traditionally is for professionals who work on federal land and in federal facilities. But now NGB members are subject to that act.

Oral argument — Friends of Lydia Ann Channel v. U.S. Army Corps of

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2017

Asked for public comment. We cited the notice on that in our brief. So if we were to vacate the injunction, on what basis can the district court, quote, stay proceedings? … It should be Administrative Procedure Act record review.

Oral argument — In re: K. GILMAN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2018

The Chandler Act, I'm not sure how it came about. … You're running over the point, though, and it goes to Judge Taylor's comment. Again, you won. Yeah.

Oral argument — 21_2997_Alicia Cohen v. Ronald Cohen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 30, 2024

Also, the comment about 85 to 95 percent accuracy. Is he qualified to make that judgment? … His counsel did not act like a potted plant. They were very assertive, as you can see from the record. He may be pro se now, but he was not at that time.

Oral argument — Multicare Health System v. Washington State Nurses Ass'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2018

The arbitrator correctly finds that they haven't been complying with the settlement but then he goes ahead and says you can't have the buddy system period and the district court says well you have to consider … This court in the recent Carpenter's decision found that it was air for the district court to make its own factual findings about the scope of the issues presented to the arbitrators.

Oral argument — United States v. Bianchi

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2010

And in Trombetta, which was the destruction of the breathalyzer air samples, there's no way you could get the air back again. … And also, while at first he said you couldn't arrest him, wasn't there a point before the Maldovan authorities acted where the judge, because I think you protested in your comment.

Oral argument — Wayne Landand Mineral Group LLC v. Delaware River Basin Commision

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2017

We, the commission, can say no well pads, period. We've got the authority to stop that. … For example, we're not an air pollution agency. These wells create air pollution, not our jurisdiction.

Oral argument — 1-19-2255

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 29, 2020

Shaliga referred to, section 217C, was actually permitted the board to make that correction in the air. … Now at that point, and it's been commented a couple times, he's a lay person. There's no question that the Riverside, or I'm sorry, the River Forest Community Center could have been a participant.