Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.60s

  • Oral argument — Randall Little v. Royal Dutch Shell, P.L.C.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2014

    I'm Sean Connolly, together with co-counsel Michael Porter and Dick LaFond, representing the plaintiffs' relators in this False Claims Act case. … The district court made comments originally saying you have no cases, no false claims. See, we didn't find that enough then. No, you didn't.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gallina v. Barr

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2020

    Gonzalez, Celadon, De La Rosa, that intention is to do the act. In other words, if the act is done, you don't have to specifically want to give him an ulcer. … To look at the full range of a six-and-a-half-year period for someone to be exposed to this is a violation. It meets the definition of torture.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Helmerich & Payne Intl v. Bolivarian Rep. of Venezuela

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2015

    But, you know, these rights and property don't exist in the air. … And in the comment, the restatement leaves that proposition open. And as I said – To 712? The comment is to 713. Which is a remedies section. I'm not saying you're wrong.

    106 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Joanna Wilson v. Navika Capital Group, L.L.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2016

    No, I don't believe so because those were put in for the PACER, and what that goes to were the representations made to her that plaintiffs were acting dutifully. … What I mean by that is, look, they can't now go justify all the acts. For instance ---- They're confined to the record. They're confined to the record.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Covol Fuels No. 4, LLC v. Pinnacle Mining Company, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2015

    Judge, the contract, what the parties call the CIPRA, the Coal Purchasing Refuge Recovery Act, does not specifically say that they have to lower the water. … Actually, as I understand the engineering of it, this water would not have gone into, under the Clean Water Act, into some other stream.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Fifth Third Mortgage Company v. Ira Kaufman

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2019

    But essentially that he's acting on his own account, and this is not the simple, clean case of just the mere member of the LLC or just an attorney-client where the attorney files a brief and may be helping … And so I believe in the response brief, Fifth Third cited the Uniform Act, Section 303, and the comment here. The comment, right. It's not in the Illinois Act. solely because of your membership.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bodin v. New Orleans

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2026

    New Orleans has affected a taking by prohibiting the appellant homeowners from renting their homes for any period less than 30 days and violated section 230 of the Communications Decency Act by impermissibly … And it particularly does it in ways that I think implicate Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Ke.M.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2016

    It's always clean and tidy. She acquired the appropriate furniture. … And any acts of domestic violence, obviously these are serious acts. None of them were before the children. There's nothing that Ms. Davis – Don't say children. I want to mean the two or the five.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Carter

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2021

    So at this point, we're sort of starting at a disadvantage because we don't have a clean slate in those proceedings. … The judge is saying that the prescribed act that you lied about, you did it. I just think that we need to extend the context a little bit.

    102 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Jose Bedoy

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2016

    It said, Some are phrases showing that the act must have relationship, time, logic, and so forth. … I'd like to begin just briefly by responding to a couple of comments from Mr. Bedoy's reply brief.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Metal Jeans, Inc. v. Metal Sport, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 11, 2020

    district court would make the drawing the inferences against metal genes on summary judgment now the second reason that the district court should be reversed and in our view is that metal sport itself acted … name is Yuval Marcus on behalf of appellee metal sport the discretion in determining basically undisputed facts of the record that there was clear and convincing evidence of appellant metal jeans on clean

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Donald Watkins, Jr.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2022

    I mean, didn't she say that they, you know, she did say that there had to be, to act with the intent to defraud means to act knowingly and with a specific intent to use false and fraudulent pretenses, … And then the government must prove- Counsel, first year law school, platitudes are not going to get you anywhere because we're not back with a clean slate. We have a record full of evidence.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — James Engstrom v. United Airlines, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2025

    The court blew air by not giving my clients the opportunity to prove their case after sufficiently... Mr. McCoy, can I ask you a question regarding abuse of discretion? Yes. … So that's the time period we're looking at, and you're saying it's that five-month delay.

    21 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Scripps Health v. Nautilus Insurance Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2026

    But what about here where there seems to be findings by the district court of large-scale failure to deal with a known mold problem over a period of years, and not just simply technical noncompliance, … It was systematic so that it affected all 40 air handling units.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Roderick Ford v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corp.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2024

    So to now stand up here today, 10 years into the case, and say, oh, no, no, no, that's all up in the air. We don't concede that at all, again, is quite surprising. … Well, I was responding to the comments that was made after the class period. Reliance piece of the representation. Yes, so it was made after the class period.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Ronqueize Head and Seronte Newby

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2020

    acts. … Do you have any comment on that? Yes, Judge. I believe that the First Circuit has addressed this argument recently.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Abordo

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2025

    Yes, and to go back to that question, because that is me muddying the waters with that early comment that caused your intervention. … You know, it's not exactly a clean record, or at least it's not a pristine period, as the government points out, because client's in prison, then gets out at some point and refuses sex offender treatment

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. John Moore, Jr.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016

    If the Macy case that came down that said if an attorney, by doing an unconscious act of sleeping, prejudiced his client, and certainly a willful and volitional. … Moore's comments and said nothing about the Alford plea? I don't believe it would have been error.

    52 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 21_2997_Alicia Cohen v. Ronald Cohen

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 30, 2024

    Also, the comment about 85 to 95 percent accuracy. Is he qualified to make that judgment? … His counsel did not act like a potted plant. They were very assertive, as you can see from the record. He may be pro se now, but he was not at that time.

    58 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Wilkins v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 30, 2022

    Is the way we go about statutory interpretation today to wipe the slate clean and let's say we're going back to the beginning? … Because whether it's jurisdictional or not is up in the air. So we could settle this case.

    65 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.