Documents

Oral argument — North Slope Borough v. MMS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2009

So the argument is a violation of the National Environmental Policy Act. … Well, no, I don't think it was plucked out of the air. And I apologize. I don't know exactly the nature of this article.

Oral argument — Lawson v. Spirit Aerosystems

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2022

Are they connected with Arconic because they did an adverse act? That would be ridiculous. That is nothing to be protected. And all that Mr. Elliott did was adverse acts. And he didn't get the job. … And I just want to comment. I just thought the briefing for both sides and the arguments today were excellent on both sides. So I commend all counsel. This matter will be submitted.

Oral argument — People v. Ewing

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2013

So at this point, we have to have an affirmative act, and the affirmative act is designed to conceal the cause of action. … Civil and criminal defendants are subjected to the same rules and the same cleaning requirements and the same statute of limitations that civil pleading is.

Oral argument — 4-17260 El Dorado v. Traylor Bros.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2005

Or they say we want it to move from A to B, and we don't want to have to go in there and clean out a zillion tons of silt every year to keep things flowing right. … And the board's supposed to, if it's an important matter, they're supposed to act promptly. They're not supposed to wait for the next meeting, right? They are supposed to act promptly on it.

Oral argument — 05-55192) TRUSTEES OF SO CAL BAKERY v. MIDDLETON

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2006

Again, this is purely hypothetical, so we're all sort of spinning in the air about this. This never came up, ever. … That's why we ask hypothetical questions and we speculate, as you have commented at least 20 times.

Oral argument — O'Malley v. Adams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2022

Um, there and these air continually raised by the bank in its, uh, in its brief. For example, they say the pray their trust does not own half of the mills. … Under the Oil and Gas Act, there was no permission to do that. None of that occurred here. They didn't have our consent.

Oral argument — Pelletier v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2012

The Act says you are, in effect, quote, unquote, an insurer of risks only related to your employment. So going up and down stairs is a risk that we all, in everyday life, assume. Yes. … I mean, the only testimony in this record was he was in a passing period, at the end of the passing period, and there were children around him.

Oral argument — Nicholas Services, LLC v. Glassdoor, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2026

The website is not acting as the providing content. So we start with that from collecting reviews. … But the comments can't do it. It would have to be defamation at the prior stage there. Why would it be defamatory for them to solicit negative comments?

Oral argument — Angie Cowan Hamada v. Laborforce, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2026

That went on for an extended period of time and then it accepted this tainted petition. And now the entire plant has lost its union. … That choice is protected by the National Labor Relations Act.

Oral argument — Whole Woman's Health v. Ken Paxton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2018

You could even inject the fetus with air. Those were other potential methods that were suggested by the maternal fetal medicine specialist who testified in this case. … No, no, I was going to feel free to wrap up that comment. I was going to move on to another.

Oral argument — United States v. Marcella Truss

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017

Trial counsel never objected to the questioning or commenting. That's correct, Your Honor. … Whether or not, whatever you would argue, we're looking at plain air here, which is the highest standard we have to reverse a district judge on a question of this sort, correct?

Oral argument — TIFOW v. MUKASEY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2008

If you look at the critical facts here, that in a five-week period, Mr. … And then she goes back and three days later says, you know, the guy's just full of hot air. And that seems very strange.

Oral argument — United States v. Jose Silva

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2012

Nothing during that period of time. So it was revoked. So then in 2003, there's another revocation and reinstatement? There was, at that time, a hearing on the revocation. … I might have, I may add some things to it, but re-estatement of probation isn't out of the air. It's not out of the air. There's a probation order earlier that I imposed.

Oral argument — Midship Pipeline v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 25, 2022

If we were to conclude that we lack jurisdiction, so we just dismissed that we didn't comment on anything else. … We just do what they say, period, but forget cost. Well, they have an obligation too, that has to be accommodated to reasonable.

Oral argument — People of the State of New York v. Trump

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2025

If you think, as defendant has put it, the Supreme Court's decision wipes the slate clean. They still did not act sufficiently diligently to meet the general requirements of the statute. … But it is also correct to say that the slate is not in fact wiped clean.

Oral argument — Eugene De Boise, Sr. v. St. Louis County, Missouri

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2014

He had committed no crime other than acting out with his psychosis. … In this case, there is an initial 12-second period.

Oral argument — United States v. Alberto Paz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2015

That's the reason the protect act gave that's the reason congress gave for switching it over. … Comment 1 helps us understand that. But go ahead. Finish out what you have to say. Thank you.

Oral argument — Gordon Martin v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2022

And the other thing is if he worked in the air-conditioned or a heated environment, he had to get in his car in the garage and drive to his work and park and go into work. … The question is, did the ALJ act wholly without reason? And it is our contention that the ALJ did act reasonably.

Oral argument — Monterey Property Associates v. Travelers Property Casualty Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2022

On page 100, it describes the known defects, such as problems with the laundry facilities and the heating and air conditioning system. … So now you're looking at a bodily injury claim, and you're looking at when did the bodily injury claim occur and how it would occur during the policy period.

Oral argument — Dianna Humphrey v. Remington Arms Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2015

They're, one gun, one rifle is being cleaned. One rifle is somebody stepping into a car with a rifle. … The period of limitation, when I'm looking at 27-2-102, it says the period of limitation does not begin on any claim or cause of action for an injury to a person until the facts constituting the claim