Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.18s
Amicus Curiae Brief — First Nat. Bank of Boston v. Maine
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1932
Hotchkiss, . 100 U.S. 491; Fidelity, etc. Co. v. Louisville, 245 U.S. 54; Brooke v.City of Norfolk, 277 U.S. 27, and Safe Deposit é Trust Co. of Baltimore v. Virginia, 280 U. … Being Avoided, Morris Anapolsky, 10 Boston ew ‘Law Review, 423, 427-9, June, 1930. Double Taxation and State Inheritance Taxes, Lyle W.
284 U.S. 312Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 19, 2024
Mendez, 581 U.S. 420 (2017). … Id. at 423. The moment of threat doctrine applied in this case aligns exactly with this holding of Mendez.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Miller-Wohl Co. v. Commissioner of Labor & Industry
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Division of Industrial Welfare, 509 F.2d 20, 22 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1063 (1976) ; and Burns v. 6 ment upon business prerogatives and uses potential federal liability as a lever … Choate, U.S. ——, 105 S.
474 U.S. 1045Amicus Curiae Brief — Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Rogers, 457 U.S. 291 (1982); Addington v. Tezas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979). 21 Winston v. Lee, 470 U.S. 753, 754 (1985). 22 Rochin v. … Bludworth, 452 So.2d at 924-925; Saikewicz, 370 N.E.2d at 423. 14 ’ thorize advance directives, such as “living wills” and duraple powers of attorney, through which individuals provide instructions
497 U.S. 261Amicus Curiae Brief — Boumediene v. Bush
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
. at 482. … But even if “formal notions of territorial sovereignty” (Rasul, 542 U.S. at 482) were relevant, government officials and legal scholars have long rejected the contention that the United States “is not
553 U.S. 723Amicus Curiae Brief — Metropolitan Stevedore Co. v. Rambo
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Caputo, 482 U.S. 249 (1977) .. 3 Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, 449 U.S. 268 Fe es ee es 3 Universal Camera v. … NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 (1951).
521 U.S. 121Amicus Curiae Brief — Board of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System v. Southworth
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Lee, 505 U.S. at 590. B. … Regents of the University of California: The Marketplace is Closed, 21 J.C. & U.L. 405, 423 (1994) (“[T)he organizations’ purposes in Keller and Abood were much narrower than the university’s purpose
529 U.S. 217Amicus Curiae Brief — Al Odah v. United States (Nos. 06-1196, 06-1195)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
/d. at 482 (quoting King v. Cowle, 97 Eng. Rep. 587, 598-99 (K.B. 1759)). … Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 79 (2005) (quoting Preiser, 411 U.S. at 482, 487). 1. A CSRT has no power to order a detainee released, even if it determines that the detainee is not an enemy combatant.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
See also U.S. … No. 96-482. 1980 U.S.C.C.A.N. (94 Stat.) 2334 (codi- fied at various parts of Subtitle D of RCRA).
511 U.S. 328Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 95-96 (1987) (recognizing “a constitutionally protected marital relationship in the prison context”). … Turner, 482 U.S. at 95-96. Gay people are parents, too, and the challenged marriage bans’ overbreadth is made yet more appar- ent by their cruel impact on the children of same-sex couples.
576 U.S. 644Amicus Curiae Brief — Boumediene v. Bush
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
/d. at 482 (quoting King v. Cowle, 97 Eng. Rep. 587, 598- 99 (K.B. 1759)). … Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 79 (2005) (quoting Preiser, 411 U.S. at 482, 487). 1. A CSRT has no power to order a dctaince released, even if it determines that the detainee is not an enemy combatant.
553 U.S. 723Amicus Curiae Brief — Facebook, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Amalgamated Bank, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 1, 2024
Co., 619 F.2d 482 (5th Cir. 1980) ............................................... 17 Dolphin & Bradbury, Inc. v. SEC, 512 F.3d 634 (D.C. … See Omnicare, 575 U.S. at 194; Matrixx, 563 U.S. at 44.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. Scott
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342, 349 (prison regulations allegedly infringing constitutional rights are themselves constitutional so long as they are “reasonably related to legitimate penological interests”) … The exclusionary rule, instead, “was a judicially created means of effectuating the rights secured by the Fourth Amendment” in discrete settings, Powell, 428 U.S. at 482, a rule that did not apply to
524 U.S. 357Amicus Curiae Brief — Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
Sims, 514 F.2d 147, 149 (CA9) (“Years of experience teach the expert to separate the wheat from the chaff... . ”), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 845 (1975). … Joiner, 522 U.S. __, 118 S. Ct. 512, 517 (1997); Daubert, supra, 509 U.S. at 589 & n.7; Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 108 (1974).
526 U.S. 137Amicus Curiae Brief — Hillside Dairy Inc. v. Lyons
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
See House Hearings 480-482. … He urged “[flederal legislation * * to preserve California’s standards” for the composition of fluid milk products, id. at 482, but did not urge legislation to protect the pricing and pooling laws against
539 U.S. 59Amicus Curiae Brief — Cincinnati Smsa Limited Partnership v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Supp. 2d 421, 423 (D. … Geier, 529 U.S. at 871-72.
540 U.S. 938Amicus Curiae Brief — Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d 1176 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 826 (1992)... 17 United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997) «2.0... 21-22 Watson v. … See United States v. 22 Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 495 (1997) (“(W]Je presume that Con- gress expects its statutes to be read in conformity with this Court’s precedents.”). C£ CFTC v.
539 U.S. 90Amicus Curiae Brief — Triangle Improvement Council v. Ritchie
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1971
Works, U.S. … Hirsh, 256 U.S. 135, 156; Shapiro v. Phompscin, 394 U.S: 618, 627. bd eis “wf ’ - ad 5 we ~ ° s- ‘ . - , * s — ~ *.
402 U.S. 497Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) 20 U.S. Dep’t of Agric. v. Moreno, 413 U.S. 528 (1973) 21 vii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) United States v. Windsor, 133 S. … Redhail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978); Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987); see also Holt v. Shelton, 341 F. Supp. 821, 822-23 (M.D.
576 U.S. 644Amicus Curiae Brief — Board of Ed. of City School Dist. of New York v. Tom F.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Kirby, 74 U.S. 482 (1868) ........ce:.ssee-sseee 25 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES - Continued United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers’ Cooperative, 532 U.S. 483 (2001) .......... … Kirby, 74 U.S. 482, 486 (1868) (“All laws should receive a_ sensible construction.
552 U.S. 1
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.