Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.62s
Oral argument — United State of America v. Rose
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2021
Rose's sentence to something other than immediate release, some intermediate point or not period. … Rose have a clean slate of it with brand new compassionate release motion is, you know, aren't we tied to the principles of, number one, party presentation and number two, the way in which the district
35 min of audioOral argument — Go Medical Industries v. Inmed Corp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2006
The reasonable royalty was a figure plucked out of the air, 3%, but it was based on excess profits. … The plaintiff sought additional claims for that period. To be honest with you, that leads into my best argument.
31 min of audioOral argument — Bruce Betzner v. Boeing Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018
They stated that it was based on the class size of 400 plaintiffs, the time period of over 10 years, the number of wells, which was 700, and also explained the way about how they quantified the plaintiff's … So I disagree because DART-Cherokee is under a mountain controversy, and, again, the grounds for removal are under the Class Action Fairness Act and 1332.
20 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Perry
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2004
I mean, the issue ripened after the 70-day period elapsed. And Mr. … We told the judge that we thought there was a potential conflict that should be aired, and that's why we had a status conference when Mr. Brooklier was substituting in.
42 min of audioOral argument — Van Winkle v. Rogers
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2023
And that was a deliberate act. They didn't accidentally. They sent those tire fragments there. They didn't just lose them. … I mean the judge was acting according to his inherent authority. There's no cause of action in Louisiana for spoliation.
35 min of audioOral argument — Misty Simms v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2016
It's not as clean cut as that, though, because you don't even know how much you paid. You've got an idea of the percentage. … All these issues are up in the air, and that's just to be honest with you. I mean, I don't want you to leave here thinking, well, I made such a point.
58 min of audioOral argument — In re Estate of Stanphill
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 28, 2017
Is the issue whether it's reasonably foreseeable to this particular person or reasonably foreseeable to a licensed clinical social worker acting in a reasonable capacity as that? … suicidal and it would have not have made any difference whatsoever as to her opinion because his opinion superseded hers that would have been a long special introduction they're supposed to be simple, clean
42 min of audioOral argument — People v. Sharples
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2012
There's no evidence that there's anyone present with him at all during that 18-hour period. And as the U.S. … Now, the second prong of Lynch requires bad acts, prior violent acts on the part of the victim.
43 min of audioOral argument — Brian Bowen, II v. Adidas America Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2022
Well, there was no integration clause in this contract, period. Number two... … And companies like Adidas clean up their act. Certain of the defendant appellees have. Whether this young fellow gets anything or not, there's something that needs to be cleaned up.
47 min of audioOral argument — Ariel Schlosser v. VRHabilis LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2024
Do you have a comment on that case? Well, I did read that case, and for one, it's factually different in quite a few ways. But on that one, as I understood the court's opinion on that, as Mr. … And then the four, as far as the discrete acts that they're referring to, there were apparently four acts, but they occurred over a four to five year time period, and the court said that that just simply
29 min of audioOral argument — In re Marriage of Downs
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2009
She was the one that ensured Diana got to school each morning, that the children were fed, cleaned, and taken care of for the remainder of the week. … They acted as a family unit throughout the marriage and after separation.
37 min of audioOral argument — Taxpayers and 101 E. Crossroads, LLC v. Weber
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2015
So notice is more of an information act, right? That's the way the statute appears to be written, Justice. … All they had to do was pick a number out of the air, stick it in there, and they had a state's attorney who said, okay, fine.
47 min of audioOral argument — Razor Capital v. Antaal
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2012
It could include the cleaning of, you know, the cleaning of the uniforms for Razor for all I know. What charges? Charges were incurred by use of the card. They could be based upon this complaint. … Can you respond to counsel's comment that three times in his motion to dismiss, he said that this complaint did not factually state a cause of action.
35 min of audioOral argument — Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 15, 2013
Your clock starts running at proof of loss, and so long as you wait a 60-day waiting period, you can then file your claim in court regardless of whether the insurer has actually acted on your claim. … I'm not sure that they could, but it's certainly within their right to initiate notice and comment rulemaking. Ginsburg. Ms.
61 min of audioOral argument — Covol Fuels No. 4, LLC v. Pinnacle Mining Company, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2015
Judge, the contract, what the parties call the CIPRA, the Coal Purchasing Refuge Recovery Act, does not specifically say that they have to lower the water. … Actually, as I understand the engineering of it, this water would not have gone into, under the Clean Water Act, into some other stream.
47 min of audioOral argument — Joanna Wilson v. Navika Capital Group, L.L.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2016
No, I don't believe so because those were put in for the PACER, and what that goes to were the representations made to her that plaintiffs were acting dutifully. … What I mean by that is, look, they can't now go justify all the acts. For instance ---- They're confined to the record. They're confined to the record.
45 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Gallegos (Andrew)
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2023
The government would have any act of disrespect justify retaliation, and therefore sweep in those acts of disrespect within Vicar as opposed to being a state-level violent crime charge. … But there was evidence that Romero knew, somebody told Romero, and that the Gallegos brothers brought in a third person, Jason Van Vigel, to help them clean up the scene, to rip out the carpet in the trailer
32 min of audioOral argument — Lawson v. Spirit Aerosystems
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2022
Are they connected with Arconic because they did an adverse act? That would be ridiculous. That is nothing to be protected. And all that Mr. Elliott did was adverse acts. And he didn't get the job. … And I just want to comment. I just thought the briefing for both sides and the arguments today were excellent on both sides. So I commend all counsel. This matter will be submitted.
33 min of audioOral argument — 05-55192) TRUSTEES OF SO CAL BAKERY v. MIDDLETON
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2006
Again, this is purely hypothetical, so we're all sort of spinning in the air about this. This never came up, ever. … That's why we ask hypothetical questions and we speculate, as you have commented at least 20 times.
43 min of audioOral argument — Dawn Lui v. Louis DeJoy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2024
The USPS obviously is arguing these are all discrete acts. Every little comment is a discrete act. Every little adverse action is a discrete act. … It wasn't air because it it is a discreet, a discreet act. As as Your Honor raised in the first argument, there is no question.
35 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.