Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.55s
Oral argument — BlueEarth Biofuels, LLC v. Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2013
We meant to get rid of all the parties, start over again, sweep everything clean. You go back and say, how do you explain this document? How do you explain that? … Oh, we meant to get rid of everything and wipe the decks clean when they're talking about the MOU in the same time period.
34 min of audioOral argument — Biery v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2014
This is a Trails Act takings case in which the government's liability turns upon an issue of Kansas state law. … The corridor was condemned within about a 10-year period. You have these quick claim deeds from a few specific owners.
37 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jeffrey Brown
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2024
And the jury had to decide, or could split on, which act was done. There's one act. One act. There's one act. No doubt. The jury either found that act or didn't. … Well, there's not a question of different acts if we're looking at temporal periods of time. I believe that's correct.
72 min of audioOral argument — People v. Martin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 23, 2017
But he essentially established himself to another witness that he wasn't in the house for the vast majority of the period when the complaint allegedly occurred. Yeah. … So I think that final paragraph, and then the committee comments say that. You know, the jury is free to accept, reject.
25 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ronald McKnight
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2019
The letter says the prosecutor is gassing myself through the air vents. And there is a conspiracy to entrap me into doing some inappropriate things so that they can charge me with a sex offense. … But as my colleague pointed out, the district judges, several of them, did get to observe this gentleman over a period of time in person. Yes, Your Honor.
25 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Berry
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2024
In 1984, when Vicar was enacted, the year-and-a-day rule was the state of the law in the majority of the states, and it was required for murder under federal law, and commentators recognized that the law … After holding that the Hobbs Act required the defendant to obtain property, and therefore none, which the court determined the defendant, in that case, had not done, it invalidated all the Hobbs Act predicates
19 min of audioOral argument — Inner City Contracting LLC v. Charter Twp of Northville MI
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2023
I mean, sometimes we're just trying to clean things up a little bit, you know. No, I do respect that, Your Honor. And I do understand. … There is no public comment unlike any other kind of vote. There's no public comment. It's presented that it should go to AAI. They vote. There's no discussion even by the board.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Paula Harris
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2012
Harris wrote two checks to am AC shortly after that how they before she wrote the day before Thomas wrote right okay and did we ever find any link did the government ever allege any link between those two acts … Thomas we had the extra piece of evidence you recall that his son testified you know I asked my dad what he does for a living and he said I help people with their campaigns in exchange for contracts to clean
46 min of audioOral argument — PACTIV v. Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2011
The employee shall receive compensation for a period of TTD and shall receive a further period for the specific loss mentioned herein, but shall not receive any compensation under other provisions of the … Act.
15 min of audioOral argument — Josette Ripoll v. Patrick Dobard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2015
Ripoll said, I believe I've been discriminated against because of my age, 61 years, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended. … Brown's comment. There also was no mention whatsoever of Ms. Brown's alleged comment in the original petition.
37 min of audioOral argument — George Mathew v. DEA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2012
up its act. … This $30,000 that he acknowledged making from e-drugstore was during a six-month period. He worked for e-drugstore for longer that period of time.
31 min of audioOral argument — Chazz Roberts v. Glenn Industrial Group, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020
And they have no connection whatsoever with the sexual acts they reference. … activity with the victim because what you have is these acts of physical aggression by the supervisor coupled with his demeaning and insulting comments, which I believe show an animus against Mr.
39 min of audioOral argument — Faour Fraihat v. William Barr
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2019
And again, there was a seven year period where Mr. Freyhot was free from immigration detention from 2008 until 2016. And this was the only conviction sustained in that period. … And he was under supervised release and he had to have checks for use of controlled substances and the like, and he'd gone for an extended period of time with a clean record.
30 min of audioOral argument — Koerner v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2003
Koerner was the broker of record from the period 1990 all the way through to 1999, midnight, December 31st, a period just one minute shy of ten years. Now, who is Heritage really? It's Dr. … But as Judge Coyle recognized and as we argued below, there is a transition period for each next period of insurance. And therefore, for all insurance to be issued as of January 1, 2000, Mr.
30 min of audioOral argument — Wayne Landand Mineral Group LLC v. Delaware River Basin Commision
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2017
We, the commission, can say no well pads, period. We've got the authority to stop that. … For example, we're not an air pollution agency. These wells create air pollution, not our jurisdiction.
70 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Seminole
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2026
asked trial defense counsel and the prosecutor any questions or concerns and they said nope no judge good to go here so you're saying well we don't have the burden to show prejudice but this is on plain air … that his rights are somehow violated that this jury was somehow anything but impartial and the court in trying to figure out what to do this court explained in McVeigh that there's a careful balancing act
30 min of audioOral argument — In Re Aetna Inc Securities Lit
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2010
Secondly, with materiality, you have to look at the company's denials throughout the class period. … And, in fact, if you look at the actual survey comments one more time, first it refers to the number of people they survey at the beginning.
41 min of audioOral argument — South Branch LLC v. Commonwealth Edison Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2022
, as to both the 06 Act and the 08 Act. … The ICC then reviewed that plan and approved that plan after receiving public comment.
37 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Michael Stewart
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2018
And that they knew that they had been unable to obtain any refinancing during that period. So why isn't that a false statement? … And I say that in the sense of as opposed to Shields, which would go to one of Judge Pratt's questions before, I'm not even sure we get to the plain air part of the air because in Shields the omission,
32 min of audioOral argument — Jose Ibarra v. Manheim Investments, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2014
People took meal periods. We have evidence that there is a… Every single person took a meal period, every single period according to time records. … They claim that none of the rest periods were proper because people were not authorized to leave, and there was a 100% rest period case.
34 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.