Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Paula Harris

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2012

Harris wrote two checks to am AC shortly after that how they before she wrote the day before Thomas wrote right okay and did we ever find any link did the government ever allege any link between those two acts … Thomas we had the extra piece of evidence you recall that his son testified you know I asked my dad what he does for a living and he said I help people with their campaigns in exchange for contracts to clean

Oral argument — PACTIV v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2011

The employee shall receive compensation for a period of TTD and shall receive a further period for the specific loss mentioned herein, but shall not receive any compensation under other provisions of the … Act.

Oral argument — Josette Ripoll v. Patrick Dobard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2015

Ripoll said, I believe I've been discriminated against because of my age, 61 years, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended. … Brown's comment. There also was no mention whatsoever of Ms. Brown's alleged comment in the original petition.

Oral argument — George Mathew v. DEA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2012

up its act. … This $30,000 that he acknowledged making from e-drugstore was during a six-month period. He worked for e-drugstore for longer that period of time.

Oral argument — Morgen v. US Dept of Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2009

The district court correctly concluded that this case must be dismissed under the discretionary function exception of the Federal Tort Claims Act. … Mangold said that as soon as the low-dose exposures, that wasn't something they were considering back during that time period.

Oral argument — Chazz Roberts v. Glenn Industrial Group, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020

And they have no connection whatsoever with the sexual acts they reference. … activity with the victim because what you have is these acts of physical aggression by the supervisor coupled with his demeaning and insulting comments, which I believe show an animus against Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Adams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2021

For purposes of the Speedy Trial Act, when there's a response, my argument is that it stops the time period. It doesn't hold all the time period. It just stops the time period. … So in fairness, a period from August until September is not unreasonable, Your Honor, and there's plenty of cases even in this circuit where there's much longer periods.

Oral argument — Sec US Dept of Labor v. East Penn Manufacturing Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2024

So that's the second half of my comments. That's not about the liability issue. That's about burden shifting on the amount of damages. … The fact of the matter is the Secretary's recordkeeping regulation at 785.47 says that in recording working time under the Act, insubstantial or insignificant periods of time, blah, blah, blah, may be

Oral argument — State of Maryland v. Stephen Dickson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2019

NEPA, the National Historic Preservation Act, and Section 4F of the Transportation Department Act each required the FAA to analyze those impacts, and the FAA's complete failure to comply with those laws … There was never a 60-day period where no one did anything.

Oral argument — Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2019

Trademarks are governed by State law, by Federal – and by Federal statute, the Lanham Act and the case law that's developed under the Lanham Act. So – but this is actually a much simpler principle. … Maybe like an igloo that you promised to air condition. You know, you break your promise to air condition, no more igloo.

Oral argument — Sandra Coulbourn v. Crane Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2018

All of these things, when these valves were removed from the system, would be scraped, wire brushed in order to make the flanges clean so that a new gasket could be placed on there. … And it is also a, you know, I can't comment on how many cases have been brought against Crane. I, you know, I don't, you know, I'm sure that they do. Sure. You know that to be true.

Oral argument — Thompson v. The City of New Yo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2020

Period, end of story, everybody leaves, which is what the plaintiff is contending occurred here. Correct. … And I'd actually just really encourage the court to read the comments. Again, this is the exact provision cited in Lanning.

Oral argument — Arnoldo Garcia v. Robert Wilkinson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2021

claim or if there's any basis to suppose that the uh that the plaintiff could allege facts that would survive dismissal then the case has to be reversed and sent back to the district court for a full airing … checked and and that would not be a basis for all right um thank you miss neiman kelting good morning your honors can you hear me yes thank you may it please the court melissa neiman kelting for the acting

Oral argument — In the Matter of Lance H.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2012

It may also have been a basis of the trial court's comment that the state's attorney is not going to go along with it. So that's not the director. … Like I said, the gavel's in the air, and somebody screams, give me voluntary. The court needs to address it.

Oral argument — United States v. PRAMIK

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2007

It later on noted that the Court had to do periodic reviews and revisions of those guidelines. And then, most importantly, the procedure is, is that, of course, they just propose the guidelines. … And if they're allowed to create crimes or name crimes that are not named in the immigration statute as aggravated felonies, then they're acting as a legislature that can change the maximum punishment

Oral argument — United States v. Ronald Douglas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2015

For my client to try to find work, it would be easier if that condition was cleaned up. Permit a probation officer to visit him at any time at home or elsewhere. Any time. … None of his crimes have been two people doing an evil act. They're all things like domestic battery, battery of a police officer, having a gun in a car.

Oral argument — Jose Ibarra v. Manheim Investments, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2014

People took meal periods. We have evidence that there is a… Every single person took a meal period, every single period according to time records. … They claim that none of the rest periods were proper because people were not authorized to leave, and there was a 100% rest period case.

Oral argument — American Raisian v. USDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2003

cause for the debarment by the administrator of any person from any or all of the benefits of the act for a specified period. … All under the 37 Act, not the 46 Act.

Oral argument — Burleson v. Collin Cty Cmty Coll Dist

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2021

Jackson Public School District, which says the loss of First Amendment freedoms, even for minimal periods, constitutes irreparable injury. Or R.A.V. v. City of St. … And so those reasons are all independent of the trial court's stated reasons, and this court, if it were to decide to find the court aired on 1983, should affirm the summary judgment motion for any one

Oral argument — Aroldo Rodriguez Diaz v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021

So I agree with you that the court is really operating on a clean slate when it comes to this question. … And we see that reflected in the Bail Reform Act, where the Supreme Court found that because the Bail Reform Act provides numerous other procedures, including that the burden of proof be held on the government