Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.36s
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 25, 2025
Air Act (CAA) and the EPA's Regional Haze Rule (RHR) for the regional haze program's second implementation period. … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
90 FR 46070Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 11, 2023
Air Act (CAA or “Act”) for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the 2015 national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone. … The EPA elects to issue such guidance in order to assist states, as appropriate. 2 “Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1)
88 FR 1537Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 6, 2024
The comment period ended on July 31, 2024. We received no comments on the EPA's action. IV. What action is the EPA taking? … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
89 FR 72721Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 25, 2012
EPA is approving these SIP revisions pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). … Wegman to Air Division Directors, Maintenance Plan Guidance Document for Certain 8-hour Ozone Areas Under Section 110(a)(1) of Clean Air Act, May 20, 2005—hereafter referred to as the “Wegman Memorandum
77 FR 3611Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 6, 2019
pollution requirements of the Clean Air Act for the 1997 and 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) ( i.e., ozone transport SIPs). … Response to Comments EPA received one comment during the comment period stating that EPA cannot “rely on a rule that a court has now vacated,” referring to the recent ruling by the United States Court
84 FR 59728Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Indiana
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 9, 1996
SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements that the State is already imposing. … The Clean Air Act forbids USEPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. USEPA., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S.Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
61 FR 15704Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 11, 2001
EPA publishes regulations under Sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act requiring states to submit control plans to EPA. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
66 FR 63938Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 4, 2013
The Pittsburgh Area will remain designated nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS until such time as EPA determines that the Pittsburgh Area meets the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for redesignation … EPA also proposed to make a clean data determination, finding that the Pittsburgh Area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. No comments were received on the December 10, 2012 NPR. II.
78 FR 20244Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Uncategorized Document · Oct 18, 1994
The proposed SIP revision and request for redesignation was submitted to satisfy the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … General Statutory Requirements The purpose of this section is to discuss whether the SIP revision submittal meets the statutory requirements set forth in the Clean Air Act.
Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 29, 2002
This action pertains to affected sources, as defined by the Clean Air Act's (CAA or the Act's) hazardous air pollutant program. EPA is taking this action in accordance with the CAA. … EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
67 FR 4181Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 27, 2015
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This rule is effective on May 26, 2015 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by April 27, 2015. … fees in a restricted revenue account within the Clean Air Fund.
80 FR 16284Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 28, 2006
EPA is approving this revision to West Virginia's SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
71 FR 56881Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; ID, West Silver Valley PM2.5 Clean Data Determination
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 22, 2018
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R10-OAR-2017-0170; FRL-9985-39-Region 10] Air Plan Approval; ID, West Silver Valley PM 2.5 Clean Data Determination AGENCY: Environmental … Based on the proposed clean data determination, the EPA is also proposing to determine that the obligation for Idaho to make submissions to meet certain Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) requirements related
83 FR 53201Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 12, 2008
SUMMARY: EPA is approving the State of California's request under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) to revise the designation for the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) serious nonattainment area for particulate … This action merely approves requests or submittals from the State and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.
73 FR 66759Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arizona Phoenix Nonattainment Area; PMINF10
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Jul 28, 1994
See section 188(b) of the Clean Air Act. The air quality planning requirements for moderate PM10 nonattainment areas are set out in subparts 1 and 4 of Title I of the Act. … of state action. the Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds.
Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 13, 2002
Under authority of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), this action simultaneously approves a local rule, Rule 1132, that regulates these emission sources and directs California to correct … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received comments from the following parties: 1.
67 FR 57957Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 16, 2005
These actions strengthen the SIP in accordance with the requirements of sections 110 and 116 of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act) and will result in emission reductions needed to help ensure attainment … Clean Air Act.
70 FR 48078Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 21, 1999
The intended effect of this action is to bring the AVAPCD SIP up to date in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule.
64 FR 3214Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 12, 1999
All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
64 FR 17551Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 19, 1999
The intended effect of this action is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. DATES: Written comments must be received by September 20, 1999.
64 FR 45215Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.