Documents

Oral argument — 05-71586 Azer v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2010

There are no time periods on it, unlike many other statutes and regulations. … They must act promptly and diligently, and that is why the Board of Immigration Appeals acted within a broad discretion.

Oral argument — United States v. Jingles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2003

Unless the conspiracy charged, there's a separate and distinct act. Here it was not. … When he was on the street, he was acting in concert with Jingles.

Oral argument — Kimberly Long v. Mary Lattimore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2013

that point he his testimony is extremely important however there is testimony that corroborates his testimony and that's the neighbor Philip Virga and his testimony was very detailed he said I woke up I act … context of this of this case Kimberly Long and a number of witnesses testified to this as had been drinking since 10 a.m. that day she had either had 17 shots or 20 shots of alcohol over the course of this period

Oral argument — United States v. Jack C. Whitledge

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2021

In the Eleventh Circuit, you use the clear air standard of review that the government is saying should apply here. … In that case, the defendant served as a courier over a period of time and repeatedly served as a courier for large quantities of controlled substances.

Oral argument — Alliance for the Wil v. Kimbell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008

You're incorporating things that have been previously aired and open for notice and comment and so forth. … Please feel free to comment and send all of your – we're giving you notice now that we're going to do this, and please send all of your comments if you disagree with this.

Oral argument — Muathe v. Fleming

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2018

He's now saying that 20-20 hindsight shouldn't have done it, but that's what the 21-day safe harbor period under Rule 11 is for. … Right, but there's no inference of acting under color of state law. Well, he pleads that they used the court email.

Oral argument — Yatish Joshi v. NTSB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2015

In Gibson, the concluding paragraph was that it's not reviewable, period, because it's not an order. … ask me to choose plan B, fallback position, I would say – Well, just explain to me, other than saying that's what the Ninth Circuit said, as a matter of logic, why under the Administrative Procedure Act

Oral argument — 4-17260 El Dorado v. Traylor Bros.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2005

Or they say we want it to move from A to B, and we don't want to have to go in there and clean out a zillion tons of silt every year to keep things flowing right. … And the board's supposed to, if it's an important matter, they're supposed to act promptly. They're not supposed to wait for the next meeting, right? They are supposed to act promptly on it.

Oral argument — LEE v. TRW, INC.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2005

I don't want to dwell on this for a period of time. But the law as set forth in O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Manufacturers is only that Dr. … This comment that pops up in the record is attributed to Mr. Weaver. So even if the comment was made, it doesn't get Mr. Lee where he wants to go because now it's a comment by a nondecision maker.

Oral argument — Jacam Chemical Co. 2013, LLC v. Arthur Shepard, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2024

An employee non-solicitation covenant that says he can't solicit JCCAM 2013's employees after employment for a certain period of time. … And Judge Hovland was, of course, correct to follow avid air. And if you look at this Court's decision in avid air, there are two hallmarks on this important element of trade secrets.

Oral argument — Norfolk Southern v. Cityof Pittsburgh

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Norfolk went in under a method of civil contempt, and the city set forth at that period of time that it was not acting in contempt, but it was acting prudently in trying to accomplish the goal, the goal … Your argument is that since this is an action for an injunction, that the Political Subdivisions Towards Claims Act does not apply. Correct. Period.

Oral argument — Clary Hood, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2023

I want to return to one comment I made earlier. … You said they were acting in good faith in 2015, but didn't act in good faith in 2016. Even though they did the same thing.

Oral argument — Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Administrative Revie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2015

He can always bid for more flights, but would not be paid for that period of time because he did not attend the meeting. So that's in the record. … The comments you heard about pressure pack situation and pushing him to take a plane, that wasn't the point. These pilots know you... Let's put it this way.

Oral argument — People v. Gentithes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 21, 2017

It shows that during that 24-hour period that the text messages, I'm not exactly sure what the length of period covered in the document is, but during that period there's like 11 text messages total between … Um, there's plenty of evidence of conspiracy in this case and that that evidence was not admitted in air.

Oral argument — Brett Steele v. James Mattis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2017

It seems like there was a lot of turnover in a short period of time. And during that period of turnover, the number of people over the age of 40 dropped precipitously. … But she made these terrible comments. It seems like if you don't use the term cat's paw, that can't be the basis.

Oral argument — C. B. v. City of Sonora

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2013

Well, it leaves things up in the air, basically. It didn't create any precedent as far as whether or not the conduct in Green v. … Usually, they're being – evidence is being thrown out because they detained somebody for too long a period of time and asked too many questions. Here, they ask no questions.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Reynolds

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2010

Well, I agree it's not a question of pulling a number out of the air. We don't want to do that. Right. But isn't it something that the trial judge still needs to do? … That didn't seem like what her hand does, acting him out to shoot her. And in essence, Mr.

Oral argument — Rick Parsittie v. Schneider Logistics, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2021

I see all the days, but with regard to, let's see, there's missed meal periods, missed rest period, off-the-clock work, let's see, that they've spent time before clocking in and waiting, but they're not … Schneider Logistics aided the Security Act. Where is that alleged in your complaint?

Oral argument — People v. Glover

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2023

The twin brothers, struck by gunfire, hardly had clean hands. They stole Glover's car while he was getting ready for work. … So, Your Honor, in regards to that, when the jury received that note for the time period, I will fully admit that they apparently, based on the record, were reviewing it and looking at it.

Oral argument — Catholic Charities of Jackson v. Gretchen Whitmer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2025

That was on venue for certain clean air acts. Judge Murphy wrote the opinion. And the Supreme Court had granted cert there. This Court didn't hold it. … And I'm just trying to clean up the case in terms of what's really in dispute here. Sure.