Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.17s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
* Accord In re Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Sec. Litig., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13147, at *58-59, 2004 WL 1554840 (S.D.N.Y. 2004); DeMarco, 318 F. … During the Class Period alleged in the Second Amended Complaint, Dura’s filed a motion to certify a different (i.e., longer) Class Period.
544 U.S. 336Amicus Curiae Brief — Friedrichs v. Cal. Teachers Ass'n, 135 S. Ct. 2933 (2015) (No. 14-915)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Air Line Pilots Ass’n, 108 F.3d 1415, 1422-23 (D.C. … 175, 180 (1967) (exclusive representation “extinguishes the individu- al employee’s power to order his own relations with his employer and creates a power vested in the cho- sen representative to act
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rasul v. Bush
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
The Military Justice Acts of 1968, Pub. L. No. 90-632, 82 Stat. 1335, and of 1983, Pub. L. … OPNAVINST 3461.6 (Navy), AF JI 31-304 (Air Force), MCO 3461.1 (Marine Corps).
542 U.S. 466Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Babbitt
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
this Court stated that it "agree/d] with the lower courts that have uniformly found the power conferred by the Commerce Clause broad enough to _ permit congressional regulation of activities causing air … would not have found the intrastate lakes in those cases to have a "substantial effect on interstate commerce" if the evidence showed that only two or three interstate visitors came there over a period
524 U.S. 937Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
This Court repeatedly has cited the comments of Representative Dent and Senator Williams (the House and Senate sponsors of ERISA) as the best evidence of the intended sweep of § 514. Shaw v. … case, the Massachusetts Chapter of the Associated Builders and Contractors challenged the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority’s right to impose a project labor agreement on the Boston Harbor clean-up
514 U.S. 1032Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 1, 2023
No citizen or member of the community is immune from prosecution, in good faith, for his alleged criminal acts. Id. at 46 (internal quotation marks omitted). … Ct. 1897, 1907 (2018) (cleaned up). This is so not only for the wealthy and the powerful, but also for our great nation’s less fortunate.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Trigen-Oklahoma City Energy Corp. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
The Association’s membership of about 900 members worldwide, including 850 in the United States, consists of representatives from utilities, municipals, universities, hospitals, military bases, air- … National Energy Policy Develop- ment Group, “National Energy Policy,” stated in May 2001, when announcing the Administration’s energy pol- icy priorities: The electricity industry is going through a period
534 U.S. 993Amicus Curiae Brief — Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
In his view, the facts behind the recitation of long hearings and numerous witnesses "...do not support an inference that over-the-air TV is at risk." Jd. … of such stations a reasonable period within which to provide different program- ming...." 9 sufficiently important governmental interest in regulating the nonspeech element can justify incidental
512 U.S. 622Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 12, 2025
Wal-Mart Stores, 564 U.S. at 348–49 (cleaned up). This is especially true in cases where the damages sought include statutory damages for each alleged violation. … California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (Unruh Act) states that any violation under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) constitutes a per se violation of the state’s statute. Cal. Civ.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Thurston, 469 U.S. 111 ENINENN corn canconcgsnsnssontionndeabansdiniaase aiisiondaanereaeas 12 United Air Lines v. … The court further recognized, quoting Justice White in his concurrence with this Court’s deci- sion in United Air Lines v.
493 U.S. 801Amicus Curiae Brief — Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Morgan, 413 U.S. 1 (1973), which is cited by the Government's amici in describing the scope of National Guard in a period of civil disorder and several students were injured or killed. … Other than commenting on the general desirability of on-campus recruiting, neither the sponsors nor the military proffered any evidence to show that the military was actually having trouble recruiting
547 U.S. 47Amicus Curiae Brief — Minnesota v. Carter
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
KEENEY Acting Assistant Attorney General MICHAEL R. DREEBEN Deputy Solicitor General JEFFREY A. … Instead, t jhe only evidence presented showed“ that respondents were residents of another eity and that they “had been at the apartment for a period of a few hours on May 15, 1994, during the police
525 U.S. 83Amicus Curiae Brief — Georgia, et al., Petitioners v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 29, 2019
The stakeholder committee receives public comments, creates a proposal, and then, using the public comments and committee member expertise, finalizes a standard. … opportunities, and then the Public Comment Hearing is held.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 16, 2019
Through the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996, Pub. … This in turn has resulted in “a massive On the Judiciary, 116th Cong. (2019) (written testimony of Acting Secretary U.S.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 23, 2020
Telecommunications Act of 1996, § 202(h), 47 U.S.C. § 303 note (emphases added). … Telecommunications Act of 1996, § 202(h), 47 U.S.C. § 303 note.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 923 (2018) (No. 17-965)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Wald, 468 U.S. 222 (1984) ............ccccccceeeeeeees 21 United Air Lines, Inc. v. … See Hawaii, 878 F.3d at 684 (interpreting 17 “suspend” and “period” as limiting the President’s “ex- clusion power”).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 30, 2018
See Hawaii, 878 F.3d at 684 (interpreting 17 “suspend” and “period” as limiting the President’s “exclusion power”). … Immigration & Nationality Act of 1952, Pub. L. No. 82414, 66 Stat. 190 (June 27, 1952), § 215.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Petitioner then PS PII Ms air tat Beste . a i eg eT a J amended his charge to include an allegation of dis- criminatory discharge (ibid.). … Similarly, iC Burnett Dre initiation of a aicly Federal Employers” Tiability Act suit in state out was held to have tolled the runying of the limi- ation period with respect to a later suit brought
421 U.S. 454Amicus Curiae Brief — Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
for several hundred retired miners (and their dependents) whom it actually employed for some period of time. … engages in adjudication or notice-and-comment rulemaking.
534 U.S. 438Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Comment. 339, 340 (1987). … American Air Filter Co., 772 F.2d 1303, 1313 (7 Cir. 1985); Hetzel v. County of Prince Wil- liam, 89 F.3d 169, 171-72 (4% Cir. 1996); Biggs v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.