Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.32s
Federal Register · Notice · Sep 22, 1995
Center #2, North Carolina; (20) Red River Army Depot, Texas; (21) Rio Vista Army Reserve Center, California; (22) Seneca Army Depot, New York; (23) Sierra Army Depot, California; and (24 … (801) 399-7828 Detroit Army Tank Plant, MI...................... (810) 574-6584 Detroit Arsenal, MI.............................. (810) 574-6584 East Fort Baker, CA...........
60 FR 49263Defense DepartmentArmy DepartmentOpposition Brief — Bowcott v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1949
JURISDICTION The judgment of the Court of Appeals was en- tered October 29, 1948 (R. 399, 406), and a petition for rehearing (R. 407-412) was denied November 10, 1948 (R. 413). … the scheme to defraud and each alleged that, ‘‘for the purpose of executing the said scheme and arti- fice, and in attempting so to do,’’ petitioners mailed a separate letter or post card (R. 11-24
335 U.S. 911Opinion — Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1926
a 24 a OS R i eR OA AL Ie Behe AR ae are ae ES Ait RRL De ee ee ey en ee a = Y . (neuen SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. No. 173.—Ocroper Term, 1925. Frank K. … S. 399, 415; Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co., 247 U.S. 179, 185; Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U. S. 189, 207. And that definition has been adhered to and applied repeatedly. See e. g. Merchants L. & T.
271 U.S. 170Reply Brief of Petitioner — DeLaCruz v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief of Petitioner · 1969
Gulf Supply Co., 399 ‘S.W. 2d 882, n.r.e., when defendant there saw. plaintiff’s car stopping and could not himself stop in time. … Attorneys for Petitioner 2] 2 Not Sixth Circuit as Respondent asserts p. 24. NER PRERE OF BY PPE Oe Lee, eG ee « > a hati as hs w w Peers epee . - ry Co Sear CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
395 U.S. 908Opinion — Almeida-Sanchez v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1973
Maroney, 399 co ‘In enforcing he Fourth Amendment’ aie 0 7 feglor I i rhe es Bs 388 upeoecniunamuumaneae - In seeking 8 rationale for vali ty of the'search in relies heavily inspec- oor ae a tionality … Stanee;-107-F. 24-162, (1982). eigeaiees av. Bird, 456 F.2d 1023, 1024 (1972); Ramirez v. » 263 -F.: 2d 386, 387° — and’ Haerr v.
413 U.S. 266Opposition Brief — Beets v. Hunter
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1949
On February 24, 1949, within 60 days from the denial of these motions (see 28 U. 8. ©. (1948 rev.) 2107), respondent filed a notice of appeal from the judgment of January 22, 1948, and the 4 further … S. 399, 418.
338 U.S. 832Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · May 1, 2025
Nos. 24-7117 and 24A1057 EXECUTION SCHEDULED FOR MAY 1, 2025, at 6:00 P.M. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). Hutchinson v. Sec’y, Fla. Dep't of Corr., No. 25-11481-P (11th Cir, May 1, 2025).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Paschal v. Didrickson
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992
(App. 399, 429- 430, 453, 512). … App. 24-37.
502 U.S. 1081Respondents Brief — Johnson v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1980
SE CE iin cha ke na ke bane vanes ated Reade ee kee 24 United States v. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 [1970]). See also Banks v.
449 U.S. 953Amicus Curiae Brief — Olympic Airways v. Husain
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
As the Court recognized in Saks, the Warsaw Convention does not define an “accident” for purposes of Article 17. 470 U.S. at 399. … See 470 U.S. at 398-399. Both distinctions are preserved by treating an airline’s “unexpected or unusual” response to a medical crisis as an “accident.”
540 U.S. 644Amicus Curiae Brief — Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, 135 S. Ct. 2311 (2015) (No. 14-857)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997) ..........c000000+ 24 Russell v. United States, 661 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. SIT aicicedhianiieeedeiicannsieainsata lila aati iipataetaeaaaiaaaaae 12 San Mateo Cnty. v. … Cole, 504 U.S. 158 (1992)...........c.cecececesssesseseseeeeeseees 24 Yearsley v. W.A. Ross Constr.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 30, 2023
WL 31863704 (San Antonio, December 24, 2002, no pet. h.). … 399-402]; wherein Petitioner is the sole devisee of the subject property.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v EPA, 399 F.3d 486, 516 (2nd Cir. 2005), quoting CWA section 304(b)(2)(B). … Waterkeeper Alliance, 399 F.3d at 515.
Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. People ex rel. Callahan
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1956
Co., 300 TIL 399, 133 N. E. 467 People v. C. M. & St. P. R. R. Co., 381 TI. 58, 44 N. E. WP CAN ikshedhs Sanins seeueni Ore tet People v. … Wechsler, 263 U.S. 22, 24.)
352 U.S. 832Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 19, 2019
Sept. 1, 2005)............................................. 24 Peconic Baykeeper, Inc. v. … See Upstate Forever, 887 F.3d at 642-43. 24 protect. See N. Cal. River Watch v. Mercer Fraser Co., No. C-04-4620 SC, 2005 WL 2122052 at *2 (N.D. Cal.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jesse Lee Coddington, Petitioner v. John Davids, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 22, 2019
In Simpson v Jones, 238 F.3d 399 (6th. … See Simpson v Jones, 238 F.3d 399, 408 (6th. Cir. 2000).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Wheeler v. Barrera
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
e) | 5, 10, 27, 28 Section 116.24 24 Section 116.31 (e) 23 2. … Supp. 399, 412 (1972), aff'd, 409 U. S. 808 (1972).
417 U.S. 402Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 1, 2019
Turkish, 192 N.J. 399, 930 A.2d 416 (2007) ................................................................. 11, 20 Alabama Women’s Center v. … Ed. 2d 665 (2016). 24 Id. at 2309. 22 9 and rewrites and further complicates the standard.25 Second, it rejected the rational basis to act standard for a strict review unlike prior cases.26 Third, the
Respondents Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Kolovrat v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1961
Co., 219 N.Y. 343, 114 N.E. 399, — 402. : 15 Jones v. Meehan, 175 U.S. 1, 32 : oe * Lukich v. Department of Labor and Industries, 176 Wash. | 221, 29 P. (2d) 388, 390) © 14 Petersen v. … April 24, 1958, interpreting Article II of the Yugoslavian treaty, re- ' ferred to at page 18 of the petition for certiorari (App.
366 U.S. 187Petitioners Reply Brief on Reargument — Yellin v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief on Reargument · 1963
"irginia, 399 US. 344; Bates: v. ity, of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516; Shelton v. Tucker, 364 US,.479. … Donds,. 339 TLS. 382, 422, 24.
374 U.S. 109
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.