Documents

Petitioners Reply Brief — Court House Plaza Co. v. City of Palo Alto

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1983

Id., at 399-400, 171 Cal.Rptr. at 402. … Dated: October 24, 1983 Respectfully submitted, S & MAN Nlalman J EY P. WIDMAN Attorneys for Petitioner CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) Jeffrey P.

Interim Decision #2797

Agency decision · Agency decision

On June 24, 1977, the Church of God Chapel sought to confer preference status upon the 399 Interim Decision #2797 respondent as a minister.

Reply — Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.

Supreme Court brief · Reply · 1976

The significance of this additional seniority for each employee in the class is discussed at length in our brief on the merits at 24-29. … Jd. at 399.

Memorandum — Habig v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1973

Agent Vandever testified that at approximately 3:30 a.m. on October 24, he crawled through the bushes and then between the two vehicles parked in the Holiday Inn lot and put his nose down close to … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51-52; Carroll y. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 153: see Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433.

Opposition Brief — Bencel v. Frost

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1965

(Pet. 464i, 51, 52; J.A. 339-345, 399- 400.)*- Mickel and Johnson tei in their semua (1) | that the Company would lose business if unionized ; (2) that the Company was able and willing to keep the … | went” would continue to hire its employees ‘‘through gaining unit who had worked for the Company for 30 days or more during the preceding 12 months, or for 45 days or more during the preceding 24

Supplemental Brief — Winterthur Reinsurance Corp. of America v. California

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1993

See Winterthur Pet, 23-24. When all is said and done, plain- tiffs are still consumers of primary insurance, and Win- terthur and other reinsurers are stil! sellers only of re- insurance. … VoTH ARNOLD & PORTER 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 715-1000 DouGLAS L. WALD ANNETTE M. LANG ARNOLD & PORTER 1200 New Hampshire Ave., N.W.

Prologue — Tilton v. Ramirez (No. 05-736)

Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005

Brown 399 F.3d 964 (9th Cir. 2005) Rose v. Lundy 455 U.S. 509 (1982) Rummel v. Estelle 445 U.S. 263 (1980) Schriro v. Smith ek. ee 126 S. Ct. 7 (2005) Singleton v. … United States District Court, Central District of California, Denying Certificate of Appealability _ APPENDIX G Judgment of the United States District Court, Central District of California 21 24

Record and brief — Supreme Court Records & Briefs 1935 Full Opinions

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1935

Conmisbioncr | 24 16 " 113 Schuy]ki1] Trust Ca. v. Pennsylvan 3 7 133 American surety Co. v. Electric -Co. 12 5 141 Vutaiineds ve’ Furland , “1 176 Pacific States Co. v. White 5" 189 U.S. v. … Lunsford 399 8». 403 Pacific Tel. Co. v. Tax Comm'n, baa 34 420 Leahy v. State Treasurer Ne 599. "2 422 Bayside Fish Flour Co. Vv. Gentry 2:° 4 “431 Whitfield v. Ohio 377 7 441 Matson Nav.

PAWNEE NATION OF OKLAHOMA

Tribal code · Tribal code

For special arrangements after business hours call (918)399-1756. … Keys need to be returned with 24 hours after building usage. Keys that are not returned are subject to a $75.00 fee to have the locks changed. This will come out of the security deposit.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp (No. 09-365)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009

(D.I. 399 at 8- 11) BSC relies, in part, on Harris Corp. v. Ixys Corp., 114 F.3d 1149, 1152 (Fed. … (D.I. 388 at 1022:3- 1024:4; 1056:25-1058:24) In contrast, Dr.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Triplett v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1971

Harris, TM. 24, 963 NE. 24 35 Petitioner Frank Triplett prays that a writ of certio- Tari issue te review the judgment of Supreme Court of Umow affirming the trial court of attempt rape. … Davis (2d eir. 1968), 399 F. 2d 948, cert, denied 393 U.S. 987.)

Opposition Brief — Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior Court of the City of San Francisco

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

Be ok Oe ee JAN 18 399] \ >>) JOSEPH F. SPANIOL, JR. … See, e.g., 12 U.S.C. § 24, (Seventh) (“board of directors or awy authorized officers or agents”). [Emphasis added].

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Neris Montilla, et al., Petitioners v. Federal National Mortgage Association, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 5, 2021

Lebron, 513 U.S. at 399. … Lebron, 513 U.S. at 399 (emphasis added).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bannister v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010

Burchett, 399 N.W.2d 258, 266 (Neb. 1986). … Bolden, 979 S.W.2d at 591, quoting Burchett, 399 N.W.2d at 266-67.

Opposition Brief — Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990

Preambles {| 30,419 | FN EE ee eee eee ON 4,6 | Order No. 399-A, Refunds Resulting From Btu Measurement Adjustments, FERC Stats. & Regs., Regs. … See, e.g., Consolidated Gas Supply Corp., 24 FERC § 61,271 (1983). 11 [section 4] and defining its authority to modify them [sec- tion 5].” Pet. App. 52a.

Opposition — Shelton v. Carlton

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1984

Co., 633 F.2d 401 (5th Cir. 1980) 24, 25 Statutes 28 U.S.C. § 1254 (1) 2 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) 2 Fed. R. Evid. 403 23 Fed. R. Evid. 404 (b) 2, 24 F. R. Cw. P. 51 3,16 Sup. Ct. … (Tr. 2-399, 400). These individuals were Fr. Armand John Gilbert, Keith V. Ellis and Joy Michelle Bristo. Dr.

Opposition — Slevin v. City of New York

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425 (1977) «sere eerrererreecece 24, 36 n v. … Roe, 429 U.S. 589 (1977) «ese e reer eee renee 24, 34, 36 Zablocki v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Crosthwait Equipment Co. v. John Deere Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993

Code 1972, § 75-24- 51(6). 9. … Code Ann. § 75-24-51(6) (1972).

United For the United States — United States v. Seattle-First National Bank

Supreme Court brief · United For the United States · 1944

Bank, 101 F. 2d 399 (C. C. A. 9), compelled . … Bank, 101 F. 2d 399, that these transfers were exempt because they resulted “‘wholly by operation of law” within the mean-, _ ing of Article 35 .(r) (Appendix, infra, p. 26).

Reply Brief — Ricky Lee Smith, Petitioner v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 6, 2019

Ct. 399 (2016) ........... 11, 12 Sullivan v. Hudson, 490 U.S. 877 (1989) .............................. 6 T-Mobile S., LLC v. City of Roswell, 135 S. … Ct. 399 (2016), relied on by the Amicus (Br. 33-34), similarly concerned an administrative refusal to reopen a prior final decision. 826 F.3d at 501.