Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.23s
Memorandum — Michigan v. Doran
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1978
U.S. … Weinstein v Bradford, supra 423 US 148.
439 U.S. 282Petitioners Brief — Reeves v. Alabama
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1954
California, 342 U.S, 165, 173, 174, 179. 1? … Denno, U.S. ——, 98 L. ed.
348 U.S. 891Supplemental Brief — Norcal Waste Systems, Inc. v. Abraham
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 2002
Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 26-27 (1983) (“FTB”). The Government also contends that Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386 (1987), supports its theory (U.S. 10); it dees not. … See Caterpillar, 482 U.S. at 394-95; Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck, 471 U.S. 202, 220 (1985).
537 U.S. 1071Appellants Brief — McClanahan v. Arizona Tax Comm'n
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1973
Montana District Court, 400 U.S. 423 (1971). Villa je of Kake v. Egan, 369 U.S. 60 (1962), for the jesition that state laws can be extended over Indian §. … Montana District Court, 400 US. 423 (1971), Mr. Jus- . mn i a brief in support of its legislation.” 400 U.S. at 432.
411 U.S. 164Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 2, 2018
These procedures are set forth in regulations at part 423, subparts M and U. … PART 423—VOLUNTARY MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFIT 21.
83 FR 49513Health and Human Services DepartmentCenters for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Shafer v. Miller-Stout
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005
[ER 26-32, 234-35, 368-423, 531-32; App. K and Q]. … [ER 311-46, 368-423].
543 U.S. 1053Appendix — Wilkinson v. Flagner
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2001
Turner, 482 U.S. at 89. … O’ Lone, 482 U.S. at 349; Turner, 482 U.S. at 89.
534 U.S. 1071Amicus Curiae Brief — Overton v. Bazzetta
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Turner, 482 U.S. at 91. … Turner, 482 U.S. at 90.
539 U.S. 126Brief for Respondents — Manhattan Properties, Inc. v. Irving Trust Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondents · 1934
Farrar, 281 U.S. 624.........ecceecees 24 United States v. Jackson, 280 U.S. 183....... iealcwee see United States v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 276 U. S. 160... 39 C'ated States ¥. … ‘Stafoff, 260 U.S. 477, 480; Black on Interpretation of Laws (2nd ed.) § 181.
291 U.S. 320Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
United States, 362 U.S. 217 (1960); United States v. Skipwith, 482 F.2d 1272 (5th Cir. 1973). … Davis, 482 F.2d 893 (9th Cir. 1973).
450 U.S. 982Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Federal Register · Notice · Dec 20, 2005
to U.S. and foreign labor combined. … The Care Labeling Rule, 16 CFR Part 423 (OMB Control Number: 3084-0103) The Care Labeling Rule, 16 CFR Part 423, requires manufacturers and importers to attach a permanent care label to all covered textile
70 FR 75461Federal Trade CommissionOpposition Brief — Banknote Corp. of America v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997
Fall River Dye- ing, 482 U.S. at 43; Burns, 406 U.S. at 280 & n.4. … Fall River Dyeiny, 482 U.S. at 46 & 8 n.12.
519 U.S. 1109Initiation of Five-Year (“Sunset”) Reviews
Federal Register · Notice · Nov 1, 2016
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Department official identified in the Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S … For information from the Commission contact Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205-3193.
81 FR 75808Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationReply Brief — Clemons v. Missouri
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1997
United States, 41 M.J. 212 (U.S. Armed Forces 1994) ............ Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 (1975) .. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) . . Oregon v. … must be scrupulously honored. 423 U.S. at 106.'
522 U.S. 968Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
Federal Register · Notice · Sep 3, 2020
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. … Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports during the POR.
85 FR 54983Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationPetition — Captline v. County of Allegheny
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
Holly, 176 U.S. 398, 20 S. Ct. 410, 44 L. Ed 520, and of Goodrich v. Feris, 214 U.S. 71, 29 S. Ct. 580, 53 L. … Commonwealth Ct. 27, 423 A.2d 434 (1980).
466 U.S. 904Federal Register · Notice · Jul 16, 1999
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review the draft habitat-based recovery criteria may obtain a copy by contacting the Grizzly Bear Recovery Coordinator, U.S. … In May 1994 The Fund For Animals, Inc., and 22 other organizations and individuals filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia over the adequacy of the Plan approved in 1993.
64 FR 38464Interior DepartmentFish and Wildlife ServiceU.S. Environmental Solutions Toolkit
Federal Register · Notice · Dec 7, 2012
NW., Room 4053, Washington, DC 20230; 202-482-4877; email e nvirotech@trade.gov; fax 202-482-5665. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The development of the U.S. … (Phone: 202-482-4877; Fax: 202-482-5665; email: todd.delelle@trade.gov ). Edward A. O'Malley, Director, Office of Energy and Environmental Industries.
77 FR 73022Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationBrief for Petitioner — Walling v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. (No. 74)
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Petitioner · 1946
Fodgeras Merce 325 U.S. at 423-424). … Belo Corp., 316 U.S. at 635.
Certain Robotic Floor Cleaning Devices and Components Thereof Institution of Investigation
Federal Register · Notice · Mar 2, 2021
Patent No. 9,884,423 (“the '423 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 10,813,517 (“the '517 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 10,835,096 (“the '096 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 7,571,511 (“the '511 patent”); and U.S. … Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
86 FR 12206International Trade Commission
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.