Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,113 results
0.17s
Opposition Brief — Seal v. Seal
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994
(In Re Burris, 136 U.S. 586, 593-594, 10 S.Ct. 850, 34 L.Ed 500 (1890); see, also, Ankenbrandt v. Richards (1992) 112 S.Ct. 2206, 2214-2215, 119 L.Ed.2d 468, 482- 483.)
513 U.S. 872Opposition Brief — Sheridan Road Baptist Church v. Michigan Department of Education
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987
fe Supreme Court, U.S, ae $tLED No. 86-1560 \ | , APR In The 25 W987 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED ST#?PES ay SPANIOL, JR. … See 426 Mich, supra, at 482, 495-497; 396 NW2d, supra, at 381-382, 388 and 132 Mich App, supra, at 12-13, n 1; 348 NW2d, supra, at 269- 270, n 1.
481 U.S. 1050Opposition Brief — Wood v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
App. 416, 422-423, 266 N.W. 2d 829, 832 (Ct. App. 1978). … .” 440 U.S. at 728.
474 U.S. 944Opposition Brief — Musser v. Pasadena Unified School District
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Union School District, supra, 395 U.S. at 632; Evans v Cornman, 398 U.S. 419, 422-423, 26 L.Ed.2d 370, 90 S.Ct 1752 (1970). … Wesberr Sanders, supra, 376 U.S. 1, 17 (1964); Kramer v. Union School District, supra, 395 U.S. 621, 632; Bullock v. Carter, supra, 405 U.S. 134, 144; Cipriano v.
508 U.S. 961Opposition Brief — United States, ex rel. Benjamin Carter, Petitioner v. Halliburton Co., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jan 31, 2018
Olano, 507 U.S. 725 (1993) ........................................... 15 United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997) ........................................... 17 United States v. Wong, 135 S. … Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 488 (1997) (even after this Court has granted review, “an inconsistency between a party’s” position in lower courts “and its position before this Court” is a valid “consideration[]
Opposition Brief — Del Toro v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1975
United States, 384 U.S. 855_______- 9 Haas v. Henkel, 216 U.S. 462_------._-- 9 Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265 U.S. 182_- 9 Harney v. … Riassell, 417° U.S. 423; Shermin v. United States, 356 US: 369! Sortells ¥. | United States, 287 U.S. 485. 6.
423 U.S. 826Opposition Brief — Munson P. Hunter, III, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Aug 27, 2025
See, e.g., Mezzanatto, 513 U.S. at 201. … Singletary, 75 F.4th 416, 422-423 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 144 S. Ct. 519 (2023) (citation omitted) (cited at Pet. 13).
Opposition Brief — Tropp v. Corporation of Lloyd's
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011
Court Agreement June 30, 2005, 44 I.L.M. 1294 16 NCCUSL, Uniform For Recognition Act (1962) Y'UCCUSL, Uniform Foreign-Count: Money Judgment Recognition Act (2005) 90.91 917 festatement (3d) § 482 … The other amicus who signed the same brief is Geoffrey Hazard, who served as the ALI’s director in 1987 when it issued the Restatement (3d) of Foreign Relations Law, Section 482(1)(a) of which endorses
564 U.S. 1046Opposition Brief — Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1947
merely oil shipments moving on “junction settle- ment,” and covers the period October 19, 1928, until December 27, 1929, when “through billing” was established (Stipulation, Record page 38; Record page 482 … Reference should also be made to the Federal Arbitra- tion Act of 1925, 9 U.S. C.
330 U.S. 825Opposition Brief — Anthwaun Jordan, Petitioner v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Aug 23, 2019
U.S. … Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 484 (2000)).
Opposition Brief — Charles C. Lynch, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · May 15, 2019
Corp., 411 U.S. 655, 674-675 (1973) (PICCO); Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 559, 571 (1965); Raley v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 423, 425-426 (1959). … U.S. at 430, 431-432).
Opposition Brief — Hanousek v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000
See Liparota, 471 U.S. at 423- 424 n.5 (noting that the Model Penal Code recognizes four mental states: purpose, knowledge, recklessness, and negligence); United States v. … Lambert, 355 U.S. at 228.
528 U.S. 1102Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 13, 2020
Gonzalez, 545 U.S. at 528. … Jd. at 423-28.
Opposition Brief — Brown v. Ledbetter
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990
City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing Auth., 479 U.S. 418 (1987) ........... 9, 11 Constitution, statutes, regulations and rule: U.S. … City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing Auth., 479 U.S. 418, 423 (1987). Recognizing that implied cause of action cases like Cort v.
494 U.S. 1027Opposition Brief — Pollock v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1953
* * ¥* * * (26 U.S. C. 1946 ed., See. 145.) … United States, 138 U.S. 353, 360; United States v.
345 U.S. 993Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Sep 24, 2018
Ass’n, 426 U.S. 482 (1976) .............................................. 17 Koenig v. Flynn, 285 U.S. 375 (1932) .................................. 13, 20, 25 League of Women Voters of Fla. v. … Ass’n, 426 U.S. 482, 488 (1976).
Opposition Brief — Yardarm Restaurant, Inc. v. City of Pompano Beach
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004
Shrewsbury Township, 808 F.2d 1023 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. ok i of PRE EE TT CTE TE Oe OEE 15 Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, eee Pee eee 6 Palko v. Connecticut, Se SE OEE. … (development plan), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 906 (1987); Biser v.
540 U.S. 1141Opposition Brief — Santoni Roig v. Iberia Lineas Aereas de Espana
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991
of Trade, 222 U.S. at 581. … Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Driv- ers, Local No. 70, 415 U.S. 423, 438 (1974). 11 =‘ Petitioners claim that the ‘‘reason why the Secretary of Labor and Human Resources does not appear in the
502 U.S. 811Opposition Brief — Cowher v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1949
App. 423 ( Abs.) Senquist v. Hardward Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 296 III. App. 510, 523, aff’d 371 Ill. 360................. Shortway Lines v. … Co., 321 U.S. 29..... Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 131 Pa. Super 588, 200 A. 21 Turner v. Donovan, 50 Ill. 85 U.S. v.
338 U.S. 828Opposition Brief — F. H. Vahlsing, Inc. v. Maine
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1953
Lacy, 200 U.S. 226, 234, 50 L. Ed. 451, 26 S. Ct. 232 0,9 Baker v. Druesedow, 263 U.S. 137, 140, 68 L. Ed. 212, 448. Ct. 40 14 Bowman v. Continental OC ompany, 256 U.S. 642, 65 L. … allocation of a portion of the funds raised by the tax to advertising the product is but a method of as- suring to those taking advantage of the research a market for the product.”’ (147 Me, at p. 423
346 U.S. 890
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.