Documents

Oral argument — People v. Relerford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2016

The only thing it says is he has to know he committed the act. The act itself is not criminal, except for maybe threatening. … Here there was no such thing because the MSR period is by operation Y and there was no discretion. And the same is for Kirkpatrick.

Oral argument — In re Estate of Pellico

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2014

So I think that when the ward died in November of 2006, there were about $35,000 in fees that involved the period before her death. … Any other comments? No. I have one. All right. I'll say something, and then you can think in the background as to whether or not you have any further comments. All right.

Oral argument — Jean Shrem v. Southwest Airlines Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2018

So the customer goes in there with an expectation that they have a 12-month reusable fund period from the date of the purchase of the ticket. … The Air Carrier Access Act, other things, that to the extent those regulations change, then the airline has to follow those regulations even if their contract is different.

Oral argument — USAv.Binyamin Stimler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017

And the Stored Communication Act tells us what we have to do when we, in effect, are subpoenaing these records. … They wrote the Stored Communication Act.

Oral argument — Make The Road New York v. Chad F. Wolf

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2020

Yeah, 14 days, 100 air miles. 14 days, okay. So you're already doing it there. So how's it working there? … And, in fact, when they first implemented the 1996 Act, they did go through notice and comment. Yes. The basis rule. Yeah, of course.

Oral argument — William Jimenez Bolanos v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2013

So we were basically acting from whatever we could have found at that time. Consequently, the government, of course, I'm sure they wrote a much better brief than we did. … Judge, I appreciate your comment. And that is what my problem is with this case. The plaintiff was convicted of merely brandishing a firearm.

Oral argument — United States v. Roy Franklin, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2025

But this is a drug conspiracy, and given that some of the case law specifically delineates the two and puts the violent acts in a RICO and drug acts in the drug conspiracy, I think it's a slippery slope … That was part of an act that Gooch undertook to benefit the conspiracy and I think it indicates that in addition to training, that he was performing kind of clean-up operations for them when things went

Oral argument — SCD BLK 251 Houston v. Mt. Jefferson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2022

What's— Well, Your Honor, this Court has said that the Declaratory Judgment Act and declaratory relief generally is a way for parties to solve disputes efficiently. … It grants the Block 251 owner, appellant, the future right to connect an air bridge or tunnel connection to a point on the wall of the improvements.

Oral argument — WELLES v. TURNER ENTERTAINMENT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2007

The contract went on for a period of 56 years, which is the life of copyright. Hollywood was only involved for two years for the production of the picture. … It was a work for hire under the 1909 Act.

Oral argument — Reilly v. Charles Brewer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2008

But if the fiduciary acted in accords with sound banking policies or prudent demand standard, however you want to say, there was every reason for it to protect the plan if it acted — if not after that … first quarter that it went into default, if it acted in the second quarter.

Oral argument — Terry Martin v. Behr Dayton Thermal Products

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2018

And you were absolutely correct on your initial comment. When there are only common issues and there are no individual issues, those seven common issues automatically predominate. … This one is not, so it's repugnant to Rule 23, period. I really struggle with that.

Oral argument — People v. Mars

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 28, 2012

And in that case, any reasonable attorney would recognize that in that time period, there's going to be an issue of causation, because Mr. … I think the law in this state is where there's an act of the accused, the death is presumed to have resulted from the act unless it can be shown that the death was caused by a supervening act disconnected

Oral argument — United States v. Corso

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 24, 2009

It would be plein air. Plein air. But the language – Now, I'm going to try to take you through this. It wasn't objected to below. We have a plein air review standard. … Do you have any comment on whether or not that is a preferred or non-preferred procedure? It's an approach that we've been looking at. It's one that we've started to do a little bit.

Oral argument — Anthony Daunt v. Jocelyn Benson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2021

It wasn't a burden that we pulled out of thin air. It was the burden they alleged in the complaint. And it was that burden that this court found to be not severe. … And so, you know, in deciding what is the appropriate period of time, there is that Supreme Court precedent, there's the precedent that a two year period is de minimis.

Oral argument — United States v. Kenner (Constantine)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2022

Your Honor, if you know from the witness testimony, this is not a case built on a communications circuit of acting. Everyone here testified. … They promised these investors shares in the air park. Meanwhile, they actually sold that air park to someone else entirely, Steve Bailey, who came and testified at trial.

Oral argument — 4-17260 El Dorado v. Traylor Bros.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2005

Or they say we want it to move from A to B, and we don't want to have to go in there and clean out a zillion tons of silt every year to keep things flowing right. … And the board's supposed to, if it's an important matter, they're supposed to act promptly. They're not supposed to wait for the next meeting, right? They are supposed to act promptly on it.

Oral argument — Beverly Rodeo Devel. v. Goodrich

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2010

There was some money that was spent on some roof and some air conditioning repairs, and they were actually ineffectual repairs, if we're going to go outside the argument. … I mean, you have to take the fact that my client, who is a licensed broker, didn't act as one in this case. So what?

Oral argument — Jacam Chemical Co. 2013, LLC v. Arthur Shepard, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2024

An employee non-solicitation covenant that says he can't solicit JCCAM 2013's employees after employment for a certain period of time. … And Judge Hovland was, of course, correct to follow avid air. And if you look at this Court's decision in avid air, there are two hallmarks on this important element of trade secrets.

Oral argument — United States v. Jack C. Whitledge

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2021

In the Eleventh Circuit, you use the clear air standard of review that the government is saying should apply here. … In that case, the defendant served as a courier over a period of time and repeatedly served as a courier for large quantities of controlled substances.

Oral argument — Garnell Walls v. Prince George's County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2025

Again, it wasn't a legislative act of rezoning. It's simply a routine plan amendment, and they do those every month, don't they? No, Your Honor. Pretty frequently? … If there's a denial and it's a very clean case of controversy. Or it may be that the court would grant the waiver, and then we have no controversy at all.