Documents

Oral argument — Sierra Club v. DOT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2024

First, the lack of opportunity for notice and comment on the new tank car design in the final LNG rule in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act. … What I'm saying to the health issue is in the air, LNG will eventually dissipate.

Oral argument — BASF AGRO v. CIPLA LIMITED

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2012

Moreover, all of the acts in which CIPLA was engaged in this case all took place in India. Okay? … Lombardi's comment about TiVo. As the court, I think, can appreciate, having dealt with the issues in this case, TiVo does obviously not involve a default judgment.

Oral argument — Bannum, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2015

It's what you're saying that the agency looks back and sees the horizon here and they say this BANNM character can't get his act together. He couldn't get his act together in Act 1 of the play. … We gave him Act 2. He can't get his act together in Act 2. Correct.

Oral argument — United States v. Teng Zhou

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2016

And if in that case the individual had no other arrests or no other – there's no – this individual has never had any other problems with fraud and you're showing a clean record, and we look back 20 years … The fact is that he committed the act during the statutory period. Right. Okay. Whether or not he's convicted, I guess there's still an open question on whether or not 3 would apply.

Oral argument — People v. Casas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 23, 2016

So you're saying it wasn't a single instantaneous act to be performed at a given time. Exactly, Your Honor. It's a continuing offense. … Okay, so they aired on that rationale. What else – where – how else did they air in their analysis in Grogan? Well, the – the Grogan court didn't fully look at the statute.

Oral argument — Danial v. AON Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2011

Since you bring up the Illinois Supreme Court rules of professional conduct, what comments do you have concerning the fact that under the code of conduct, the division of fees have to be proportional to … It's all subject to the court because the court is, in effect, acting as a fiduciary for the class in those circumstances.

Oral argument — PlayUp, Inc. v. Laila Mintas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 5, 2022

Within the time period, remember, the record stops at the hearing in January. So I really... … Stop airing your dirty laundry, Mr. Simic. Get her the contract.

Oral argument — Sec US Dept of Labor v. East Penn Manufacturing Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2024

So that's the second half of my comments. That's not about the liability issue. That's about burden shifting on the amount of damages. … The fact of the matter is the Secretary's recordkeeping regulation at 785.47 says that in recording working time under the Act, insubstantial or insignificant periods of time, blah, blah, blah, may be

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Renner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 29, 2013

But then it goes on to say unless Shelly files a petition to modify within that four-year period. Shelly did file a petition within that four-year period. … Well, the statute says that when a court decides a modification of maintenance, it considers two sets of factors, those in Section 504 of the Marriage Act and those in Section 510, I think it is.

Oral argument — Impellizzeri v. State of New York

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2023

Are you saying that he was not demoted beyond the limitations period? … The list of accusations against him were absolutely, it's almost impossible to believe that a person as awful as him could possibly have worked at that hospital with a clean record for so many years.

Oral argument — Hayes v. Skywest Airlines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2020

Sorenson acted wrongfully when she responded briefly to the juror's comments in the elevator. Which, again, we don't concede. … Judge Carson, Skywest believes that the issue was preserved, but we agree that the record is not as clean as we wish it were.

Oral argument — Lhoist North America of Ala. v. National Labor Relations Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 20, 2022

Avery did not advise his supervisor or anybody in management that he was going to be on an extended break period. … Avery did have a relatively clean work record for over 27 years, and that the discipline didn't start until there was issues between the union and the company with respect to collective bargaining, and

Oral argument — United States v. Lopez-Velasquez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2008

But the fact is that the determination of the starting date was up in the air in 1994. … And to show that it's lawful, there is a section enacted by Congress that said during that period he could not be deported, during that period he had a right to get work permits, during that period he

Oral argument — United States v. Ubah

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2003

The government's briefing in this case was fairly complete, so I'll keep my comments brief unless the court has additional questions. … With regard to the issue of variance, I think the court's comments here were telling, and the points are correct, there is no allegation that Mr.

Oral argument — In re: Schaefers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2020

And it's acting equitably for the benefit of somebody who deserves that result, and frankly, conquers somebody who's acted inequitably. And that's the end of it. … Well, I cannot comment otherwise. You know, it is above my pay grade to come up with these arguments.

Oral argument — Dobyns v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2024

The court noted that Plaintiff intended to file an application for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. … I'll clean up some issues that the Court asked about.

Oral argument — Wanda Williams v. The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2018

What is the three-minute period we're talking about? … The Act defines an adequate warning, so one can assume if it's a no warning case, what you put in there has to meet the Act in defense of being an adequate warning.

Oral argument — Laursen v. Barnhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2004

During the period that is covered by the onset date and the adverse hearing decision, she was between 50 and 52 and a half years old. The commissioner has concluded that Ms. … She was getting help to get on and off the toilet and to have her food prepared and to have her home cleaned. I don't think there's any dispute that your client is not a well woman.

Oral argument — United States v. Henderson (Becton)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2020

It's such a burden on counsel to undertake that periodic payments were committed, et cetera. … But he went through – yeah, he went through teams of prosecutors during that period, and that's why it took so long.

Oral argument — Massetti v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2005

It's a working paper on corruption in Italy, and it relates to the time period that's at issue in this case. … It says, After 1992, the Clean Hands investigation of political corruption brought about the most serious political crisis in the history of the Italian Republic.