Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.31s
Oral argument — United States v. James Murphy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2018
The three under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act under Title 18 were all directly tied to the false claims that the defendant was convicted of. … And the defendants filed sort of revised taxes late in the investigation when they were trying to sort of come clean.
16 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2024
They showed up in 60 days and it was a 90-day period of time. They got their default notices about 45 days into that cure period. Now, admittedly, both properties have different cure periods, right? … I want to clean up the due to and due from affiliate balances on Park Terrace. I want you to make a deposit. I want you to backdate the records to September.
33 min of audioOral argument — Laursen v. Barnhart
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2004
During the period that is covered by the onset date and the adverse hearing decision, she was between 50 and 52 and a half years old. The commissioner has concluded that Ms. … She was getting help to get on and off the toilet and to have her food prepared and to have her home cleaned. I don't think there's any dispute that your client is not a well woman.
24 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Henderson (Becton)
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2020
It's such a burden on counsel to undertake that periodic payments were committed, et cetera. … But he went through – yeah, he went through teams of prosecutors during that period, and that's why it took so long.
23 min of audioOral argument — Massetti v. Gonzales
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2005
It's a working paper on corruption in Italy, and it relates to the time period that's at issue in this case. … It says, After 1992, the Clean Hands investigation of political corruption brought about the most serious political crisis in the history of the Italian Republic.
22 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Vargas
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2021
So I'm trying to understand what's triggering the plainness, the clearness of the air. You see what I'm saying? … But we can never get to discretionary prong unless the air is clear and prone. You see where I'm headed? I do.
51 min of audioOral argument — Reya Boyer-Liberto v. Fontainebleau Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2014
What about a discreet act? Let me ask you that. What would be your analysis under discreet act? … two were engaged in in probably a 15-hour period.
90 min of audioOral argument — Plastic Omnium Advanced v. Donghee America, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2019
You have your cutter has to be in the open air, period. And this is ultimately the classic question. … And you haven't given me an answer to the open air rationale. So let me focus on what Dr.
66 min of audioOral argument — In Re Exide Technologies
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
Bankruptcy court looked at New York law and correctly concluded that a contractual obligation can include both a duty to act and a duty to refrain from acting in a specified way. … The use restriction obligation is a duty of ENERSYS to not act in a specific way.
39 min of audioOral argument — Lamar Blake v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2016
In reviewing the record, yes, I believe that obviously the standard is clear air. We believe that clear air exists, one, by the use of evidence outside of the record. What do you mean? … Jaswick would have acted in a certain way. Well, that runs contrary to both Rules 608 and 404 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
16 min of audioOral argument — Clowney v. URS-AECOM
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2020
And my comments are very limited because, quite frankly, the evidence with respect to my client, the International, is incredibly limited. … They didn't act arbitrarily, discriminatorily, or in bad faith.
49 min of audioOral argument — Cita Trust Company AG v. Fifth Third Bank
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2017
Let me ask you this, so obviously this case is about the one-year limitation period. Yes. … One of the reasons that amendments are to be liberally granted is so that you can clean up an inartfully drafted complaint. Now is your time. Tell us how you would amend it.
35 min of audioOral argument — Jansen v. Santel
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2022
And I know that the plat act required some notarization but is that necessary to make a binding real estate contract? … And that notarization provision in the plat act only applies to school district issues.
33 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Brandon Campbell
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2014
It's an issue of plein air. In that case, it very well may be plein air, and the conviction may very well be reversed, but in this case, it's not. … Let's assume that it's a plein air analysis that applies. We have a subsequent case that suggested this type of thing, that we would deal with it as plein air.
39 min of audioOral argument — Celanese International Corporation v. ITC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2024
And the question this Court asks is, what does the language of the America Invents Act say? And if the language of the America Invents Act is clear, then the Court needs to go no farther. … There are arguments made about Section 102A and 102B, where 102B is the grace period.
32 min of audioOral argument — In re Marriage of Sadovsky
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2019
Brown could have also asked for a review during this period of time. But now we get to the point that Dr. … And it's not a narrative to say I need painting, windows, and air conditioning. And the court just really didn't want to consider all the evidence.
40 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jesmene Lockhart
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2018
So, again, where the slate is clean, where we don't have any evidence either way, the tie goes to affirming the district court's judgment. … And then, there's no evidence in plain air that he would have done differently. I think Massenburg would still say it's fine. You could give none of those. None of those things.
36 min of audioOral argument — In Re Medicis Pharmaceutical
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2009
And all three of those are more or less common issues in the art that's involved in skin treatment and cleaning. Is that your argument? In essence, yes, Your Honor. … I suggest what it comes down to, there's nothing other than the examiner's assumption, when you see maximum penetration, to mean that will act very quickly, put on the skin, wash it off.
26 min of audioOral argument — STARRAG v. MAERSK
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2006
That's also known as the tackle-to-tackle time period. … And just so I understand your argument, Starrag knew that at least for that time period, unless they did pay a higher shipping cost, that the limit of liability for that period of time was $500 per item
24 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jingles
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2003
Unless the conspiracy charged, there's a separate and distinct act. Here it was not. … When he was on the street, he was acting in concert with Jingles.
34 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.