Documents

Oral argument — Ansfield v. Omnicare

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2014

We're not writing on a clean slate here. As another panel of this court recognized just two weeks ago in Daly v. … The Wave 1 audit only examined transactions between 2000 and 2005, not even during the class period. Seven years before the class period began.

Oral argument — AT&T Communications of Califor v. Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2010

So that you would have paid essentially nothing for the period until 2004 and at the rate cap rate after that? That would – that's correct, Your Honor. … How does that get cleaned up?

Oral argument — United States v. Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2022

I mean, that's the purpose of the act. But to Judge Rendell's point, the act requires that the FBAR be filed, correct? The act requires that the FBAR be filed, that's correct. … During this period of time, the relevant period, 2007, 2008, a couple years thereafter, was he living outside the United States or was he living in Cranberry?

Oral argument — Tinka Vassileva v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2024

I am not, we're not appealing the overtime or the acting up, thank you, or the acting up. Though I reviewed the settlement and Vassileva won and those we did settle. Okay. … I believe I aired by putting her on that list, and that's why she was there. We have since had a general, and he says, not regarding her in particular.

Oral argument — Kotynek v. Carle Clinic Association

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2011

And then there's this merger, and suddenly his stock is worth a lot more, and now they're apparently trying to clean up the books. Yes. … But there's an elimination period, as it's referred to in the Hartford policy. So you go another six months.

Oral argument — George Hallak v. L3 Communications Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2012

Well, I mean, as a lawyer, if I get a transfer order, I say, well, some of this is wrong, but I can clean that up later. And the question is whether I'm going to object or not to the bottom line. … Under the FLSA, you really just have to look at what was the period of time that a person worked and what were they doing while they were there.

Oral argument — 1-17-2058

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2020

The state produced no evidence of any prior acts of violence by Joseph, or of any conflicts between he and his mother. … He came up with an explanation that he was cleaning gutters and that's how this stuff happened, and maybe he was just scratching his neck, but there was other, that is also circumstantial evidence that

Oral argument — Ortiz v. Ashcroft

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2004

The fact of his conviction has been determined by this Court already, period. That's not the issue. … Likewise, he's ineligible for relief under the Life Act for the same reason.

Oral argument — Jacam Chemical Co. 2013, LLC v. Arthur Shepard, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2024

An employee non-solicitation covenant that says he can't solicit JCCAM 2013's employees after employment for a certain period of time. … And Judge Hovland was, of course, correct to follow avid air. And if you look at this Court's decision in avid air, there are two hallmarks on this important element of trade secrets.

Oral argument — Copan Italia Spa v. Puritan Medical Products Company LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2023

And thus the Air Force was designated for the purpose of contracting. And the Air Force had agreed that these were covered countermeasures in the contract itself. So there is a record here. … The Air Force contract recognizes... So that's asking us to sit as fact finders.

Oral argument — United States v. SULLIVAN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2005

So why — why is this — I guess we did decide whether there's plain air, but — There is no question that it is incompetency of counsel for trial counsel not to have raised this, not to have noticed it. … – that, frankly, it doesn't apply because of how the Mandatory Restitution Act is written.

Oral argument — CSInc (WA) v. CSInc (FL)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2003

that the plaintiff is duty-bound to act. … There's nothing in the instructions that said this only applies to this time period and this only applies to that time period.

Oral argument — United States v. Tony Barnes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2009

Under this Restitution Act, Section B3B, it says, this section shall not apply in the case of an offense described in paragraph, if the court finds from facts on the record that, determining complex issues … And my opposing counsel here comments that we didn't have all 31 of the victims coming in and making specific claims.

Oral argument — Make The Road New York v. Chad F. Wolf

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2020

Yeah, 14 days, 100 air miles. 14 days, okay. So you're already doing it there. So how's it working there? … And, in fact, when they first implemented the 1996 Act, they did go through notice and comment. Yes. The basis rule. Yeah, of course.

Oral argument — United States v. Styles Taylor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2018

The second summer, not only was his father drugged, but our client saw his father commit acts of violence against women, namely he watches his father hid behind a door waiting for his father's girlfriend … There were house parties where marijuana and alcohol were consumed regularly, and it was my client and his younger sister's job to clean up the marijuana reefers the next day after the party.

Oral argument — Horton v. Board of Education o

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2019

It's a tough act to follow, your honors, but I will proceed. … because he's out back cleaning some equipment from his BOCES class. He walks on the bus, and they go, Skyler, Skyler, you missed it. To us, that's exculpatory evidence. It should have been heard.

Oral argument — United States v. Andre Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2021

In the hearing, specifically as it related to the prior violent acts of Mr. Johnson, those were specifically brought up in the years of those convictions. … Johnson, to have his firearm out for a very brief period of time. This was not 20 minutes of having his gun pointed at him.

Oral argument — T-Mobile USA Inc. v. City of Anacortes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2009

It didn't necessarily put on some of its own evidence, to be sure, but it took comments from the public as well. … In what other way, and you mentioned the high school didn't work out, and now whether it would be possible or not is apparently up in the air. I don't know.

Oral argument — Curtis Ervin v. Ron Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2021

Anderson did not limit his prejudicial comments towards Jewish people, but also African-Americans. … The toxic air was so severe that paint was peeling off of houses, paint was peeling off of cars.

Oral argument — Clint Matkovich v. COSTCO

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2019

Matkovich while he was on temporary restrictions and punished COSTCO for not criticizing his performance during that two-year temporary restriction period. … There was a comment about transitional duty. Mr. Matkovich was not on or in a transitional duty role. He was never given a transitional duty letter.