Documents

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Federal Register · Notice · Oct 17, 2023

On October 24, 2018, the Departments published guidance (86 FR 53575) that provided supplementary information about the requirements that must be met for the approval of a section 1332 waiver, the Secretaries … Form Number: CMS-10383 (OMB Control Number 0938-1389; Frequency: Occasionally; Affected Public: State Governments; Number of Respondents: 19; Total Annual Responses: 399; Total Annual

Commercial Driver's License Standards: Application for Exemption; Daimler Trucks North America (Daimler)

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 21, 2015

The on-line FDMS is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. … , subject to the following terms and conditions: (1) The driver and carrier must comply with all other applicable provisions of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) (49 CFR parts 350-399

Notice of Intent To Temporarily Close Selected Public Lands in Maricopa and Pinal Counties, AZ

Federal Register · Notice · Mar 20, 2020

The FRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question. You will receive a reply during normal hours. … The legal description of the affected public lands are: Baldy Mountain (Approximately 399 Acres) Gila and Salt River Meridian, Arizona T. 6 N., R. 1 W., Sec. 10, SE 1/4 NE 1/4 , NE 1/4

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

Agency decision · Agency decision

The order indicates that petitioner filed a petition with the bankruptcy court on April 24, 1996, pursuant to chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C.). … Commissioner, 75 T.C. 389, 399 (1980). jurisdiction to redetermine "In exercising our deficiencies, we are without jurisdiction to 'allow or disallow a claim against a debtor's estate * * * or

Petitioners Reply Brief — Smith v. Yeager

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1968

IN THE Supreme Court of the United States OCTOBER TERM, 1968 3 . » No. 399 . Epear H. SMITH, JR., Petitioner, Vv. “Howarp YEAGER, WARDEN, Respondent. … (Pet. 24-25). “6. That Lema never personally consented to the . alleged ‘‘waiver’’.. (Pet. 23).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — First National City Bank v. Gillilland

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1958

U.S. 24 (1958) ? Order of ng y Sommuctars y- Swan, 329 ‘Cv. S. Tal v. ae, 349 U.S. 331°(1953) - Ralph rv, Cronk, 266 N,°Y. 428 (1934) | Service vr. Dulles, 354 U.S 363 (1957 )\ - Siegel vr. … U hited States, 87 Pus. 399 CE. D. N. YY, 1949) - es aoe Social Sec urity Board r. Nierotko, 3 327.U. S- 358, 369 (1946) ° St: ee Stockyards Co. rv United States, 298° U.S. 38 (1936) Stark v.

Reply Brief — Kasi v. Virginia

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1999

See Appendix at 67 (“I don’t find there’s any jurisdiction of a state court to hold a federal official in contempt for failing to respond to a state court’s subpoena”), 362- 385, 399-422. … Moreover, his brief does no more than simply articulate Assignments of Error 2, 7, 16, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 27, 29, 30, 437, 45, 51, and 54 in a completely conclusory manner. (Def.

Opposition Brief — Johnson v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986

+ @24 3 in terms of negligent failure to prevent the assault and battery’ ” (Pet. App. A1l0 (quoting Shearer, slip op. 2-3)).' … United States, 788 F.2d 395, 399-400 (6th Cir. 1986).

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Cordle v. Alabama

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974

On February 24, 1972, the defendant filed a “Motion to Determine Sanity.” This Motion was also denied on the fol wir g day by Judge Emmet. On April 12, 1972, the Circuit Court appointed Hon. … Alabama, 399 U. S. 1, 90 S.Ct. 1999, 26 L.Ed. 2d. 387 (1970) and his counsel was aware of all the testimony that took place at that time.

Petition for Rehearing — In Re Kevin Ogden, Petitioner

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Jun 24, 2025

REPONDENTS: TENTION mn KEHEARLNG Case Number: 24-7/75 By: Kein Ooden 44394 "Kevin Ogden Pyro Se Peni ten (ACY “pf [Ve w Me xiCo SoutA Unit: 2A-L- ee P.0.B80K [699% Santa fe, New Mexice §7502- 059 … United States, 354 UL. 394, dt 399 , 100/97 7), See also Will Vv. Unpted Séak CF, 309 US. 90, at 96-97 (1967).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Andrey Bridges, Petitioner v. David W. Gray, Warden

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 3, 2020

Dempsey. 261 U.S. 86; 24 Mooney v. Holohan. 294 U.S. 103; 24 Bowen v. Johnston. 306 U.S. 19, 24. 24 Actual Innocence. 24 U.S. v. Friday. D.C. … Marruio. 86 N.M. 399, 524 P.2d 1015, 1019; 24 b) False Imprisonment, where Bridges is unlawfully under detention, whereby he is denied his personal liberty, “Quoting”; Dupler v.

Petitioners Brief — Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1986

McCloud, 259 S.C. 409, 192 S.E.2d 202 (1972); appeal dism’d,413 U.S. 902 (1973). .......... 24, 25, 28 Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947)... passim Hicks v. … Committee for Public Education, 413 U.S. 472, 480 (1973). 24 religious that the Establishment Clause was violated by his participation, even though the program itself was neutral.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jou v. Argonaut Insurance Insurance Insurance Co Co (No. 07-1173)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007

Pennsylvania, 382 US. 399, 401, 88 S.Ct. 518 (1966); Yick Wo v. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 401, 86 ER a ai nrkdscsdcccesscocese 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 30 Gonzalez v.

Determination of Reasonable Rates and Terms for Noncommercial Broadcasting

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 25, 2012

(i)     Number of full-time students 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Level 1 <1,000 $319 $325 $332 $339 $345 Level 2 1,000-4,999 369 376 384 392 399 … [FR Doc. 2012-9927 Filed 4-24-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1410-72-P

Juvenile Justice: Rights During the Adjudicatory Process

Congressional research report · CRS Report · Apr 16, 2007

Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he or she is charged.24 … stating that the reasonable doubt standard has always been assumed to be the requisite standard of proof in criminal cases and that there has been ubiquitous adoption of this standard by the states). 24

Opposition Brief — Gas Spring Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

R. 24(c). 9 2. a. A strike is an unfair labor practice strike “if an {employer’s}] unfair labor practices had anything to do with causing it.” NLRB v. … Crystal Springs Shirt Corp., 637 F.2d 399, 404 (Sth Cir. 1981). Accord Queen Mary Restaurants Corp. v. NLRB, 560 F.2d 403, 412 (9th Cir. 1977); NLRB v.

Opposition Brief — City of Pocatello, Idaho v. Idaho (No. 08-135)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008

Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994) ..........-....006- 14 Howell v. Mississippi, 543 U.S. 440 (2005) ............ 14 Minnesota v. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411-412 (1994); Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip, 430 U.S. 584, 588 n.4 (1977).

Petition — Steelcase, Inc. v. Delwood Furniture Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

Balax, Inc., 421 F.2d 809, 812 (7th Cir. 1970) cert. den. 399 U.S. 911 PR ea ces Cuter Lie Lns cece ut woke, Pereckas 06 Carter Products vy. … JURISDICTION Appellant seeks review of the Fifth Circuit Opinion dated August 8, 1978, for which a Petition for Rehearing was denied and entered on October 24, 1978.

Reply Brief — Steve Chabot, et al., Applicants v. Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 21, 2019

Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ......................................................................................................................8 New York v. … As the Applicants’ stay motion observes (at 24), no plan to date has been upheld under the district court’s test.

Brief for Fred a Seaton Secretary of the Interior in Opposition — McKenna v. Seaton

Supreme Court brief · Brief for Fred a Seaton Secretary of the Interior in Opposition · 1958

Petitioner Me- Kenna on January 24, 1955, tiled a protest against DeArmas’ application which Was rejected hy both the Bure aa of Land Management and by the Solicitor, act- ing for the Seéretary; the … App. 24) and ignered by petitioner.