Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2003

10,000+ results

0.09s

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Henry T. Liggins, Petitioner v. Bob Vashaw, Warden

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 4, 2020

    McQuiggin, 569 U.S. at 399 (quoting Schlup, 513 U.S. at 329 (addressing actual innocence as an exception to procedural default)). … Id. at 399-400.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., Petitioners v. Rochelle Garza, as Guardian ad Litem to Unaccompanied Minor J. D.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 30, 2017

    (Pet. 20-24, relying on United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39 (1950), and similar authorities). … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 409-410 (1986)).

  • Reply Brief — Julius Jerome Murphy, Petitioner v. Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 1, 2019

    Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 430 (1986) (O’Connor, J., concurring) (quoting Grannis v. Ordean, 234 U.S. 385, 394 (1914)). … See Appl. for Postconviction Writ of Habeas Corpus (Sept. 24, 2015) at 44–45 (“Appl.”).

  • Reply Brief — Implax Laboratories, Inc. v. Astrazeneca AB (No. 05-1583)

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2006

    Monolithic Power Systems, 399 F. Supp. 2d 1064 (N.D. Cal. 2005) ........ 5 Pernell v. Southall Reality, WEE is OP AITTED Ca ele wees eee Ree 10 | Pfizer Inc. v. … Monolithic Power Systems, 399 F. Supp. 2d 1064, 1087-88 (N.D.

  • Jurisdictional Statement — Danny Vincent v. State of Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1980

    Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966) ...... 3 Hicks v. Miranda, 422 9.8. 332 (A973) se ee eee ll Hoyt v. Florida, 368 U.S. 57 (1961) Milheim v. … On March 24, 1978, Robert McCutcheon was appointed counsel for Appellant upon Appellant's "Affidavit of Inability to Employ Counsel ."'

    449 U.S. 199
  • Opposition — Canon v. Massachusetts

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978

    S, : FILED FEB 24 1978 In the MICHAEL RODAK, JR., CLE Supreme Court of the United States. OctTosBEer TERM, 1977. No. 77-1048. ANTHONY J. CANON, PETITIONER, v. … Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970); Mancusi v. Stubbs, 408 U.S. 204 (1972).

    435 U.S. 933
  • Amicus Brief — Caesar v. Mountanos

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1977

    United States, 222 F.2d 399, (D.C, Cir, 1955)................ 7,8 United States v. Twelve 200 Ft. Reels of Super 8 mm. … (Fix & Haffke, Basic Psychological Therapies: Comparative Effectiveness, 24 (1976).

    430 U.S. 954
  • Reply Brief — Boggs v. Summers

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1999

    YALOWITZ Counsel of Record ARNOLD & PORTER 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 715-1000 DENNIs G. LYONS ARNOLD & PORTER 555 12th Street, N.W. … See Pet. 24-26.

    528 U.S. 811
  • Opposition Brief — Thomas A. Ayre v. State of Maryland

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1974

    New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970).............. 10, 11 Ebert v. Maryland State Board of Censors, 19 J UI iaclaccisitacsensianinessniinticnienaaticnpiesinie 7,8,9 Gray v. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 69 (1970).

    419 U.S. 1073
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Batson v. Kentucky

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

    Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970); Taylor, 419 U.S. at 528. … If this Court makes it clear that use of the peremptory challenge to practice -24- racial discrimination will not be tolerated, the frequency with which a trial court will be required to distinguish

    476 U.S. 79
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n of Broadcasters v. Quincy Cable TV, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

    FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (1968). And in United States v. … (App., m. 24a n.24.) These statements are contradicted by the facts noted above.

    476 U.S. 1169
  • Motion — Green v. Amerada Hess Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1980

    (R. 191) On July 24, 1975, Green's employment with Amerada Hess was terminated for cause!, (R. 186, 192). … New Haven Inclu- sion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, 450, n.66 (1970). Therefore, this Court should not review this concurrent finding of fact.

    449 U.S. 952
  • BRIEF OPPOSSING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL — Kirschke v. Houston

    Supreme Court brief · BRIEF OPPOSSING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL · 1960

    Appellants stated in open Court ~ . a — ee - » =< “ 24 that they would not an.end their petition. … City of West University Place, 141 Tex. 608, 17545.W. 2d 396, 398, 399, (1943). 2 ae The same rule of law is upheld by the Supreme Courts of sister states.

    364 U.S. 474
  • Petitioners Brief — Thomas v. El Dorado Irrigation District

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1942

    Waco Dev, Co., 87 Fed. (2d) 395, 399; John Hancock Mutual Life Inswrance Co. v, Bartels, 308 U. S. 180, 60 S. Ct. 221; American United Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. … Supp. 399. See Rule 52, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

    317 U.S. 660
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Stanley Aron Cavienss, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 18, 2021

    Docket Entries, No. 3:16-cr-00114-6 (VAB), ECF Nos. 379, 389, 396, 399, 419. Before the sentencing hearing, the Court considered the parties’ filings and the U.S. … Bank ofAm., 723 F.3d 399, 403 (2d Cir. 2013) (quoting Triestman, 470 F.3d at 474). III. DISCUSSION 6 Case 3:18-cv-01920-VAB Document 7 Filed 01/15/20 Page 7 of 9 Mr.

  • Reply Brief — Mike Finnin Motors, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. United States, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 16, 2021

    United States, 282 U.S. 399 (1931) ............................................. 1 Loretto v. … (Pet.24). B. The Government Cannot Be Excused from Its Decision Not to Oppose the Direct Takings Claim.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shawn Travis Paschal, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 10, 2025

    Cotton, 399 F.3d 913 (8th Cir. 2005) .................................................................................. 10 United States v. … Paschal, No. 24-11112, 2025 WL 1927682 (5th Cir. July 14, 2025)(unpublished). It is reprinted in Appendix A to this Petition.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Amarin Pharma, Inc., et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 9, 2026

    NO. 24-889 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ______________ HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC., ET AL., Petitioners, V. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 406-407 (2012) ..................................8 eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388, 391-392 (2006) ..................................9 Festo Corp. v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Coinbase, Inc., Petitioner v. Abraham Bielski

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 27, 2023

    , 2016 Date 821 Fed.Appx. 753 July 24, 2020 816 F.3d 587 Citation 2a Case Name The Thomas KinKade Co. v. … Applicable 669 Fed.Appx. 487 October 13, 2016 668 Fed.Appx 777 Reversed Reversed 473 Fed.Appx. 793 June 12, 2012 859 Fed.Appx. 31 Affirmed Not Applicable 772 Fed.Appx. 569 June 28, 2019 855 Fed.Appx. 399

  • Commercial Driver's License Standards: Application for Exemption; Daimler Trucks North America (Daimler)

    Federal Register · Notice · May 4, 2016

    The on-line FDMS is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. … Boehm would be required to comply with all applicable Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (49 CFR parts 350-399) except the CDL provisions described in this notice. Mr.

    81 FR 26866Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.