Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.43s
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 25, 2013
period. … The Liberty-Clairton Area will remain designated nonattainment for the 1997 annual PM 2.5 NAAQS until such time as EPA determines that the Liberty-Clairton Area meets the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements
78 FR 63881Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 6, 2012
This action is being taken in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's rules for states to prevent any future and remedy any existing anthropogenic impairment of visibility … Code Ann., Environment Title 2, Ambient Air Quality Control, Subtitle 10 Healthy Air Act, Section 2-1001-2-1005 (2012).
77 FR 39938Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 31, 2001
We are proposing action on a local rule that regulates this emission source under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
66 FR 67497Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 5, 2012
During the respective comment periods we received one comment letter from ADEQ (“ADEQ comment letter”), which concerned the requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) and 128. 8 In our July 30, … Air Act.
77 FR 66398Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 14, 2005
Air Act. … of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.
70 FR 34362Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Revisions; California; Feather River Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 31, 2024
This revision concerns a rule submitted to address section 185 of the Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”). DATES: This rule is effective January 30, 2025. … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received five comments.
89 FR 107012Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 30, 2003
Final Action EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the SIP because the revisions are consistent with Clean Air Act and EPA regulatory requirements. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 38631Environmental Protection AgencyApproval of California Air Plan Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 13, 2017
We are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: This rule will be effective on April 12, 2017. … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted.
82 FR 13398Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 16, 2007
Air Act. … As part of its redesignation requests, the State submitted maintenance plans as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 27425Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 13, 2012
EPA is proposing these determinations under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 12, 2012. … First, pursuant to section 181(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), and based upon complete, quality assured and certified air monitoring data for 2007-2009, EPA is proposing to determine that the
77 FR 14712Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 17, 1997
The intended effect of proposing approval of these rules is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 16, 1998. ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Rulemaking Office, [AIR-4], Air Division, U.S.
62 FR 66043Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 11, 2011
Comment 2: TMRA, TIP, Luminant, GCLC, and AECT commented generally that the Clean Air Act requires that EPA “shall not approve a revision of a plan if the revision would interfere with any applicable … Comment 5: TMRA, Luminant, and AECT commented that EPA should follow its established position that Pollution Control Project permits are acceptable under the Clean Air Act.
76 FR 1525Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 7, 2025
The SIP revisions consist of the following: 2014 and 2017 calendar year periodic emissions inventories. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal
90 FR 29821Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 14, 2015
Statutory and Executive Orders Review Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
80 FR 40911Environmental Protection AgencyPerchloroethylene (PCE); Regulation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 18, 2024
The comment period closed on August 15, 2023. … For purposes of this final rule, disposal includes the use of PCE to comply with requirements for HWC facilities under the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) (40
89 FR 103560Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 6, 2018
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This final rule is effective on April 5, 2018. … Public Comments and EPA's Responses EPA received adverse comments from one commenter, the Clean Air Council (hereinafter referred to as the “Commenter”).
83 FR 9435Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Revisions; California; Sacramento Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 6, 2024
Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted. … (A) Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District. ( 1 ) Rule 307, “Clean Air Act Penalty Fees,” amended on March 23, 2023.
89 FR 15962Environmental Protection AgencyRedesignation and Approval of Ohio Implementation Plan
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 2, 2004
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” … This criterion requires that the state has met the requirements of Clean Air Act section 110 and part D.
69 FR 4856Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 22, 2012
We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: These rules will be effective on November 21, 2012. … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received comments from the following party. 1.
77 FR 64427Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 6, 2012
We are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III.
77 FR 5709Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.