Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Andre Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2021

In the hearing, specifically as it related to the prior violent acts of Mr. Johnson, those were specifically brought up in the years of those convictions. … Johnson, to have his firearm out for a very brief period of time. This was not 20 minutes of having his gun pointed at him.

Oral argument — Estate of Kenneth Dale Sumner v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2024

And so once he got into the—once he was picked up by the paramedics and air-vacced to the air center, he was pulseless. He had a collapsed lung. … them to be involved in the act itself.

Oral argument — Dobyns v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2024

The court noted that Plaintiff intended to file an application for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. … I'll clean up some issues that the Court asked about.

Oral argument — Rebecca Snoeyenbos v. Marcia Curtis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2022

It's not a plein air standard of review because we're not challenging the jury's ruling as to the evidence. … It said a specific intended act of expression, not a specified harm. And there's a substantial difference between specified harm and specific intended act of expression. Who specifies the harm?

Oral argument — Clint Matkovich v. COSTCO

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2019

Matkovich while he was on temporary restrictions and punished COSTCO for not criticizing his performance during that two-year temporary restriction period. … There was a comment about transitional duty. Mr. Matkovich was not on or in a transitional duty role. He was never given a transitional duty letter.

Oral argument — Lesley Williams v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 19, 2024

And then she told them that she would take their damn drug test so that when it comes back clean, they could shove it up their ass. … So were the faculty invited to comment to the ad hoc committee or no? No.

Oral argument — In re: GAVIN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 23, 2022

a time not a bankruptcy debtor but they had the judge had ruled in his tentative ruling that the property located in burlingame was not the judgment debtors homestead under california law and as was commented … factors and costs involved in that but just basically on the judgment debt and the allowed costs by the court so far he is proposing in his chapter 11 proposed plan to pay those back over a 60 month period

Oral argument — People v. Sanchez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 30, 2011

Peter Sanchez, in the comments of Joel and Murphy. Thank you, Coach. You may. May it please the Court, I'm Clerk Sir Bayless, with the people of O.C. Again, my name is Joel Murphy. I represent Mr. … But the crime clearly happened at some point in that time period. You said there was someone else that broke in with him. I know that you speculate on that in your brief, but...

Oral argument — United States v. Rosario-Perez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2016

to the ones charged in the indictment is the type of comment that cannot also be erased by a limiting instruction. … The brief states all of the judge's comments, but the judge recognizes that that was impossible to comply with.

Oral argument — United States v. Canty

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2022

What reasonable probability means may be up in the air. But that's the standard that is actually a little different than the way the First Circuit has recited it. … So what's the benefit that the others get out of Canty having a four-month period overlapped in the same sales locations? Well, I would say two things.

Oral argument — Dikho v. Mukasey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2008

And the Iraqi Crisis Refugee Act, I don't believe that the board has issued a presidential decision interpreting that act. … And the act seems to encourage motions to reopen if the denial was in part based on changed country conditions. And petitioner, based on the relevant date, seems to qualify under the act.

Oral argument — United States v. Steven Helton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2014

And the district court, when it came time to choose the particular sentence in this case, didn't really provide any analysis of what the proper period of supervised release was. … It couldn't be a number that the court pulled out of thin air. I agree. $5 million, obviously, is what they stole. If I'm looking...

Oral argument — Fernando Zavala v. Terri Gonzalez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2013

As for Respondent's comments here, I apologize, I realize that there was a substantive portion of Mr. … Cefalla was claiming he didn't actually do these acts or not, that there were enough other witnesses to say, yes, he was ranting and raving and saying these things and firing guns into the air, that any

Oral argument — United States v. Anfernee Rondeau

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2026

The first is the sufficiency of the evidence argument that the government failed to prove the requisite sexual act. … Where does your argument fit in on the plain air analysis? I would tend to agree with your earlier comments that really St. Clair isn't categorical.

Oral argument — Ansfield v. Omnicare

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2014

We're not writing on a clean slate here. As another panel of this court recognized just two weeks ago in Daly v. … The Wave 1 audit only examined transactions between 2000 and 2005, not even during the class period. Seven years before the class period began.

Oral argument — AT&T Communications of Califor v. Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2010

So that you would have paid essentially nothing for the period until 2004 and at the rate cap rate after that? That would – that's correct, Your Honor. … How does that get cleaned up?

Oral argument — United States v. Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2022

I mean, that's the purpose of the act. But to Judge Rendell's point, the act requires that the FBAR be filed, correct? The act requires that the FBAR be filed, that's correct. … During this period of time, the relevant period, 2007, 2008, a couple years thereafter, was he living outside the United States or was he living in Cranberry?

Oral argument — Ciara Vesey v. Envoy Air, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2020

And we'll move to our third case this morning, which is Ciara Vesey versus Envoy Air. All right, I see Ms. Aiken and Ms. Fiore, so you may proceed, Ms. Aikens. Thank you, Your Honor. … Massengarb's entirely inappropriate comments. Correct. Okay. Yes.

Oral argument — Tinka Vassileva v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2024

I am not, we're not appealing the overtime or the acting up, thank you, or the acting up. Though I reviewed the settlement and Vassileva won and those we did settle. Okay. … I believe I aired by putting her on that list, and that's why she was there. We have since had a general, and he says, not regarding her in particular.

Oral argument — Rachel Welty v. Bryant Dunaway

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2026

So I don't see it a clean pre and post. … So I think you look to that period of the 19th century and looking for analogous injunctions. And even in that...