Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.36s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Seila Law LLC, Petitioner v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 29, 2019
Ct. 1807 (2016) (judicial review of agency interpretation of Clean Water Act); Sackett v. EPA, 566 U.S. 120 (2012) (same); Decker v. Nw. Envtl. Def. … Ctr., 568 U.S. 597 (2013) (Auer deference to Clean Water Act regulations); Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006) (agency regulations defining “waters of the United States”).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, 138 S. Ct. 43 (2017) (No. 16-1276)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
espoused by the Ninth Circuit in this case would greatly expand the number of employees authorized to pursue the enhanced remedies of the Act, and the period of time in which they may sue for alleged … The limitations period is short—the Sarbanes-Oxley Act prescribed a 90- day limitation period, which the Dodd-Frank Act extended to 180 days. 18 U.S.C. § 1514A(b)(2)(1)); see H.R. 4173, Lllth Cong.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 1, 2025
acts that are procompetitive.” … Antitrust plaintiffs therefore “should be given the full benefit of their proof without tightly compartmentalizing the various factual components and wiping the slate clean after scrutiny of each.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — Standard Industries, Inc. v. Tigrett Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1970
ve hinds Air Products Co., pod U Ss sats ‘OOS ‘(quoting Stuilave Retrigerator Col Vv. W inte r, 280. U.S. 30, see The Court i Graver ae explamed (339 CLS. … and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.” ; 20 . .
397 U.S. 586Amicus Curiae Brief — Nash v. Florida Industrial Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1967
United Air- 5 - eraft Corp., 887 F. 2d 5. — Mortensen v. Board of Review, 21 N.J. 242, 121 : i ARETE IEA NEA ERT a AA NRE 18 - 2 Moving Pictures Machine Oyivaiere v. National 1, . … Nash had neither claimed nor received benefits for that period. ‘ ih LOONIE S fe SOT SME ANT ROME.
389 U.S. 235Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 5, 2020
an opportunity for public comment. 3. … Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 134 S. Ct. 2427, 2444 (2014)). Cf.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Ohio, Petitioner v. Janet L. Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 13, 2023
(cleaned up). Second, the offer cannot be coercive: Congress may not attach conditions to funding offers that States have no “legitimate choice” but to “accept.” … “The only way for the States to achieve unequivocal compliance with the Act is to refrain from cutting taxes during the covered period.” West Virginia, 59 F.4th at 1138. B.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Shapiro v. Thompson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1969
That California has an obligation to supply unpol- luted air and water, adequate schools, highways, hos- pitals, protective services to all of its citizens none would deny. … Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 611 (1960), which upheld an allegedly arbitrary termination of old-age insurance bene- fits under the Social Security Act.
394 U.S. 618Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
The Corps of Engineers therefore asserted that there was federal jurisdiction to bar use of the land for the Agency’s purpose, based on the Clean Water Act, the Corps’ regulations, and ultimately on … Scholarly commentators agree with this principle. 1 Ronald D. Rotunda & John E.
531 U.S. 159Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 20, 2026
Securities and Exchange Commission, Comments on Proposed Rule: Amendments to the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 2 (Release No. 34-75976; File No. S7-18-15) (S.E.C. … See Department of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 360-61 (1976). Third, exemptions from disclosure must be “narrowly construed.” Department of Interior v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Martin v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm'n
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
In the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (Act or OSH Act), Pub. L. … Training shall provide the men an opportunity to handle the tor, have it fitted properly, test its face-piece- to-face seal, wear it in normal air for a long fa- miliarity period, and, finally, to
499 U.S. 144Amicus Curiae Brief — Manufacturers Ass'n of Tri-County v. Knepper
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 EIEN epieneeicaneenec verte ee PAE eee NI OTD 10, 14 United States v. Shimer, 367 U.S. 374 (1961)... 10, 11, 12 United Steelworkers of America v. … standard, which was established after exten- reasonably necessary or appropriate to provide safe or healthful employment and places of employment.” § 3(8), 29 U.S.C. 652(8). 4 sive study, public comment
480 U.S. 929Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 8, 2024
(cleaned up)). Each of these would apply equally to a President or a pauper facing criminal charges. … To launch an air strike against a foreign political opponent? Even a clear quid pro quo for the performance of an official act presumably involves official conduct of the President.
Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Albuquerque v. Homans
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Act 64 (H. 28)(finding 9). … As one commentator has observed: It is clear that states have been activists in the area of campaign finance regulation.
543 U.S. 1002Amicus Curiae Brief — Board of Trustees v. McCreary
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1984
Andrus, supra.* Similarly, when a religious event 3 The ACLU filed a brief in support of the federal government in O'Hair, arguing that allowance of the open-air Papal Mass on public property in that … Unlike Widmar and O'Hair, where no alternative private sites existed, the use of public land for an extended religious display cannot be explained as a neutral act of toleration.
469 U.S. 915Amicus Curiae Brief — Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 138 S. Ct. 54 (2017) (No. 16-1362)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Williams, i sedaneinniiendsl 5 Utility Air Regulation Grp. v. EPA, i allel 4 Warger v. … Willis, The Evolution of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 26 U. Miami L. Rev. 607 (1972)...16 U.S.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 5, 2018
U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., as amended; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.; and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. … The 23 class here is the very definition of vague, as it includes anyone who used Google during a seven-and-a-half year period.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 1, 2021
Id. at 484 (cleaned up). … Id. at 485 (cleaned up). III.
Amicus Curiae Brief — McClanahan v. Arizona Tax Comm'n
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
Art. 20, Para. 4 i OTHER AUTHORITIES ‘Comment, Indian Taxation: Underlying Policies and __ Present Problems, 59 CalifL.Rev. 1261, 1285-1286 (1971) Comment, State Taxation of Indian Income, ~ -1971 … W aggonner, 376 US. 369 (1964) (invalid Louisiana ad valorem tax on privately owned property on an Air Force field); Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v.
411 U.S. 164Amicus Curiae Brief — Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
Cal. 1981), aire, Gee £.20 Oe em Cir. 1962) ........ 2.20 eee. 3 Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund .. Central Transport, Inc., No. 82-2157 (Juhe 19, SS 15 Charles D. … Petitioners alleged, inter alia, that respondent was bound under Section 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. 158(a)(5), to honor during that period the contribution obligations
484 U.S. 539
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.