Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.62s
Opposition — Cody v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1984
Green, 399 U.S. 149 17 Chapman V. California, 386 U.S. 18 16 Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74 16,17 Harrington V. California, 396 U.S. 250 00000... 116 Klein v. … LeRoy, 687 F.2d 610, cert. denied, No. 82-5571 (Jan. 24, 1988) Hoe srbseneriade natin sg = fi pean & ay —_——— Use ® c y4 ny Oe ec ' a -+ s 4 re Pe Ae Cases—Continued : Page United States v.
467 U.S. 1226Reply Brief — Richard Gerald Jordan, Applicant v. Mississippi
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 29, 2025
**THIS IS A CAPITAL CASE – EXECUTION SET FOR JUNE 25, 2025** No. 24A1143 No. 24-959 (connected case) In the Supreme Court of the United States RICHARD GERALD JORDAN, v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (“[E]xecution is the most irremediable and unfathomable of penalties.”), and common sense.
Supplemental Brief — Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. American Land Title Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1993
Spe. 61)... eee ee 5 surance Agents, 399 F.2d 1010 (5th Cir. 1968). 3,4 United States National Bank of Oregon et al v. … (Seventh) or is instead a limitation upon the incidental powers granted by Section 24(Seventh). 4.
508 U.S. 971Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Wade v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988
Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 at 402-03, 86 S.Ct. 518 at 520-21(1966). … United States, 374 U.S. 109 at 123-24, 83 S.Ct, 1828 at 1837 (1963).
484 U.S. 1010Opposition Brief — Daugaard v. Yankton Sioux Tribe
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011
Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411 (1994); Solem v. Bartlett, 465 U.S. 463, 470 (1984). … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411-412 (1994); Solem v. Bartlett, 465 U.S. 469, 470-471 (1984).
564 U.S. 1019Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 21, 2021
McKnight, 521 U.S. 399, 413–14 (1992)). … Id. at 123–24.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 14, 2018
See Hicks, 447 U.S. at 347; Ford, 477 U.S. at 399, 428-29; Evitts, 469 U.S. at 393. … Jan. 30, 2017); Gaskin, 218 So. 3d at 399. 9 53a In sum, the June 24, 2002 Hurst retroactivity cutoff date is not unconstitutional.
Transcript of Record — United States v. Scovil
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1955
SCOVIL States, I). sor. 999- Tn re Caswell Constry tion Co D.C. 13 F. 24 667.” … Waddill Co., supra, p. 399; United States v. Teras, supra, p. 485.
348 U.S. 218Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bryant v. Klein
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
._. 24 D. Extreme Results ............... 25 IV. … Jd. at 1354, App. at A-24.
510 U.S. 914Amicus Curiae Brief — Gray v. Maryland
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 155 (1970), and have such similar roots, see Dutton, supra, 400 U. … Rule Evid. 803(24). In Idaho v.
523 U.S. 185Amicus Curiae Brief — Bowen v. American Hospital Assn.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Br. at 22-24. … Supp. at 399.
476 U.S. 610Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Salvador Ojeda-Amarillas, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 8, 2020
ER:399-400. … ER:419-24. Over the next thirty days, agents intercepted drug-related calls between, among others, Mr. Ojeda and Andres Chavez. 2. ER:419-24. The August 2006 Wiretap.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 25, 2019
App. 24. … App. 24.
Appendices — Long Island Island Savings Savings Bank, FSB v. United States (No. 07-1234)
Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 2008
Home Savings IV, 399 F.3d at 1350. … See Tr. 397:12 to 399:8 (Test. of Fuster).
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
United States, 399 F. 2d 93 (Sth Cir.), cert. GROG. SOS ahs BORD CHMOD oh 6 ihv os cee cc cee’ On Lee v. … United States, 291 F. 958 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 263 U.S. 716 (1923), and ovrid. on other grounds, 399 F. 2d 896; United States v.
450 U.S. 978Jurisdictional Statement — Sagan v. Pennsylvania Public Television Network
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1989
See also Use of Broadcast Facilities by Candidates for Public Office, 24 F.C.C.2d 832 (19/0); Use of Br@dcast Facilities by Candidates For Public Office, 3 F.C.C.2d 463 (1966). … §396-399 (1982), albeit with respect to controlling Gontent of public’ television programs, see Annotation, Construction and Application of Public Broadcasting Act of 156) as amended (47 USCS §§
488 U.S. 998Opposition Brief — Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Evans
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990
SOUTHERN PACIFIC filed a Petition for Review of the Court of Appeal's ital 6 decision with the California Supreme Court on October 24, 1989. Said petition was denied on November 30, 1989. … Oo agic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 108 S.Ct. 1877, 1883-1885, 100 L.Ed.2d 410 (1988); Fort 21 Halifax Packing Co., Inc. v.
496 U.S. 936Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Sheaffer v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1963
(Feb. 26, 195 I ° 340 US 543. 71 SCr. 399... ING AND * me ee 1,47 ee. te THE : Supreme. … Ct. 399. the Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Tort Claims .- 419 . 2 — . Act carries ‘the ¢ Governments consent to be sued either .
375 U.S. 818Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 1, 2017
Murphy, 521 U.S. 320, 336 (1997) (holding that the AEDPA applies to noncapital habeas corpus cases filed after its effective date of April 24, 1996). … Johnson, 226 F.3d 399, 404 (5th Cir. 2000). In the AEDPA seeks to prevent "federal habeas 'retrials' . . .
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Chicago Mines Co. v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1948
Jones, 115 Fed. (2d) 61 23, 24 Commissioner v. Kennedy M. & M. Company, 125 Fed. (2d) 399 5, 9, 10, 20, 22 Consolidated Chollar, Gould and Savage Mining Co. v. Commissioner, 133 Fed. (2d) 440. … Kennedy Min- ing and Milling Co., 9 Cir., 125 Fed. (2d) 399. We do not agree.
333 U.S. 881
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.