Documents

Oral argument — Ansfield v. Omnicare

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2014

We're not writing on a clean slate here. As another panel of this court recognized just two weeks ago in Daly v. … The Wave 1 audit only examined transactions between 2000 and 2005, not even during the class period. Seven years before the class period began.

Oral argument — Westminster American v. Spruce1530LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2021

And you extend that into the post dismissal period. That's the analysis you have to make, which is the case of the facts inextricably intertwined. Is the law clear on this issue? … The district court was not writing on a clean didn't have to write on a clean slate. Instead of the abstract principle that well, there's distinctions between the two torts.

Oral argument — Martin Kipp v. Ron Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2019

There's no reason to clean it up. He, in essence, said he commented that he killed these victims and that Satan was licking them up and laughing at them. … They're really distinct, and, and this, this, uh, Satan wasn't pulled out of thin air and wasn't pulled out of, um, the Bible or brought up by, by a juror.

Oral argument — United States v. Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2022

I mean, that's the purpose of the act. But to Judge Rendell's point, the act requires that the FBAR be filed, correct? The act requires that the FBAR be filed, that's correct. … During this period of time, the relevant period, 2007, 2008, a couple years thereafter, was he living outside the United States or was he living in Cranberry?

Oral argument — 1-17-2058

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2020

The state produced no evidence of any prior acts of violence by Joseph, or of any conflicts between he and his mother. … He came up with an explanation that he was cleaning gutters and that's how this stuff happened, and maybe he was just scratching his neck, but there was other, that is also circumstantial evidence that

Oral argument — Labare v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2007

Groff and the State of California that makes his acts not the acts of the State of California but the acts of his employer, San Joaquin Helicopters. Mr. … Notice and comment is there for a reason.

Oral argument — John Vernile v. Pacifica Foundation, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2023

Vernile was hired by Pacifica as an interim executive director for a six-month period. … Six weeks after he became the ED, he took the New York station, WBAI, off the air without a vote of the executive board.

Oral argument — Estate of Allan George v. Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2023

She had heard those comments from her husband. Yes, she had relayed those to Officer Ryan. … And we don't have respondeats, period. Correct. But we have a failure to train and supervise. And this court, in a pretty recent case, Valdez.

Oral argument — Lhoist North America of Ala. v. National Labor Relations Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 20, 2022

Avery did not advise his supervisor or anybody in management that he was going to be on an extended break period. … Avery did have a relatively clean work record for over 27 years, and that the discipline didn't start until there was issues between the union and the company with respect to collective bargaining, and

Oral argument — People of the State of California v. CaremarkPCS Health LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2024

During the relevant period, all insulin rebate negotiations that Caremark conducted for FIBA plans were also for non FIBA plans too. … And I see that we've gotten into our reserve time, so I'll reserve further comment for my colleague. Good morning, and may it please the Court.

Oral argument — Andrew Wolfington v. Reconstructive Orthopaedic Associates IIPC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2018

And that's based on the comments, the official comments to Regulations V and the Federal Reserve Board's statements, interpretations going all the way back to 1977. … I don't think it is because the court had in front of it the Braith versus Ball opinion and the Federal Reserve Board comments. And the Federal Reserve Board comments are also almost right on point.

Oral argument — United States v. Darrell Gillespie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2022

It was argued to the jury that conspiracy was sufficient based upon your comments, Judge Neumeier. We now know that that is insufficient. … Therefore, in question 11, they refer back to count one of the indictment, which only says conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery, period, paragraph.

Oral argument — CSInc (WA) v. CSInc (FL)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2003

that the plaintiff is duty-bound to act. … There's nothing in the instructions that said this only applies to this time period and this only applies to that time period.

Oral argument — Chultem v. Ticor Title Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2015

And one of the questions was, or comments was, I think it was limited in scope. … Because that makes it a regulation and that makes it effectively incorporated into the Illinois Title Insurance Act.

Oral argument — Douglas Holloway v. Soo Line Railroad Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2019

That SJ had a comparatively clean record. Is there evidence that shows that that's wrong? No, there's no evidence that shows that that's wrong. … And then upon looking at his discipline record, which had amassed three to four disciplinary suspensions, prior, in a very short time period, the carrier concluded that dismissal was warranted.

Oral argument — United States v. Swick

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2025

for any period of time during which he was not in fact under probationary supervision by virtue of his own wrongful acts. … You were listening to my comments to your opposing counsel. It seems to me tolling means that you're extending the time period in which something is to be accomplished and when other words might go.

Oral argument — United States v. James Murphy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2018

The three under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act under Title 18 were all directly tied to the false claims that the defendant was convicted of. … And the defendants filed sort of revised taxes late in the investigation when they were trying to sort of come clean.

Oral argument — United States v. Jarvis Tolbert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2015

Our position is that, first of all, if you didn't have the right to actually let them enter the room, period. Why not? … Well, the police were acting with the authority that the hotel had at that time.

Oral argument — United States v. Fernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 1, 2022

him to calm down, lighting a cigarette and all, this whole— He already has admitted within a minute and a half of this, maybe two minutes, that he has been taking cocaine, but then he says his car is clean … Because they have him acting so strangely, and then they can get the toxicology reports or whatever and go with that.

Oral argument — Richard Bell v. Wilmott Storage Services, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2020

The – in Ober versus Whitman, 243-3-1190, where the de minimis concept was used to make minor variations in connection with the Clean Water Act. … But I – that's just a comment I wanted to make. The server test that has been discussed by Mr.