Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.38s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kenco Restaurants, Inc. v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000
HELVERING, 290 U.S. 11 Sb | Senn 9 ZARIN V. … Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115, 78 L. Ed. 212, 54 S. Ct. 8 (1933).
531 U.S. 814Federal Register · Notice · Sep 8, 2020
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Drew Jackson at (202) 482-4406 (Indonesia), Stephanie Berger at (202) 482-2483 (Italy), Justin Newman at (202) 482-0486 (Malaysia), Jerry Huang at (202) 482-4047 (South … Trade Administration, U.S.
85 FR 55413Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationAmicus Curiae Brief — Argentine Republic, Petitioner v. Petersen Energia Inversora S.A.U., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 3, 2018
Ct. 13812 (2017) (No. 15-423), 2016 U.S. S. Ct. … Ct. 13812 (2017) (No. 15-423), 2016 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 3114, at *38). See also Aquamar S.A. v.
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
Federal Register · Notice · Jun 27, 2014
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. … Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) data for U.S. imports during the POR.
79 FR 36462Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationFederal Register · Notice · Jan 28, 2020
Docket Nos. 50-245, 50-336, 50-423, 50-338, 50-339, 50-280, 50-281. … Docket Nos. 50-482. IV.
85 FR 5050Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). … Commissioner, 429 U.S. 569, 579-580 (1977); Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co., 417 U.S. 134, 148-149 (1974).
United States Tax CourtFederal Register · Notice · Jun 15, 2018
and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. … SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On February 9, 2018, the U.S.
83 FR 27953Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationAgency decision · Agency decision
- 5 On its amended 1988 and 1989 U.S. … Bowers, 281 U.S. 376, 378 (1930)).
United States Tax CourtPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Hill v. Jennings (No. 07-43)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 49-50, 108 S. Ct. 2250, 101 L. Ed. 2d 40 (1988) (quoting Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922, 936n.18, 102 S. Ct. 2744, 73 L. Ed. 2d 482 (1982)). … Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 49-50, 108 S. Ct. 2250, 101 L. Ed. 2d 40 (1988) (quoting Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922, 936 n.18, 102 S. Ct. 2744, 73 L. Ed. 2d 482 (1982)).
Opposition — Natelli v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
United States, 417 U.S. 333 coccccccccees 7 Donnelly v. De Christoforo, 416 U.S. 637 «0.0... 10 Egger v. United States, 509 F. 2d 745, cer- tiorari demied, 423 U.S. … United States, 423 U.S. 861; Ugarte-Veizaga v. United States, 452 F.2d 1194, 1195 (C.A. 5)?
434 U.S. 819Brief for Respondent — United States v. Ruzicka
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1946
Adler’s Creamery, 110 F. 2d 482... oe | | U.S. v. Alpha Portland Cement Co., 242 Fed. 978.. * 28 U. S. v. Baltisto, 2 Suntner | es re Sree ate 49 U. 8. v. Belt, 47 F. … Adler’s Creamery,.110 F. 2d 482, for the payment of monies allegedly due but denied, by the handler.
329 U.S. 287Respondents Brief — Hospital Menonita de Guayama, Inc., Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Nov 6, 2024
Brooks, 348 U.S. at 104; see Fall River Dyeing, 482 U.S. at 38-39. b. … See Fall River, 482 U.S. at 38-40; Truck Drivers, 353 U.S. at 96.
Appendix — Cate v. Anderson (No. 07-1436)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2008
Mosley, 423 U.S. at 105-06. … Mosley, 423 U.S. at 104.
International Trade Administration
Federal Register · Notice · May 3, 2004
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration U.S. … Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington DC, 20230, 202-482-4491 or 202-482-3415. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the April 21, 2004 meeting of the U.S.
69 FR 24132Commerce DepartmentPetitioners Brief — Beard v. Banks
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2006
Turner, 482 U.S. at 89. … Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342, 352 (1987), quoting Turner, 482 U.S. at 92.
548 U.S. 521Opposition — Gluesenkamp v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981
White, 15 423 U.S. 65. (1975) United States v. Chadwick, 15,19 433 U.S. 1 (1979) United States v. Jiminez, 15 626 F.2d 39 (7th Cir.1980) United States v. … United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925); Chambere v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970); Texae v. White, 423 U.S. 65 (1975). Petitioner's reliance upon this Court's decisions in United States v.
453 U.S. 924Federal Register · Notice · May 26, 2004
Department of Commerce, telephone: (202) 482-6809; fax: (202) 501-6849; e-mail: saul.Summerall@technology.gov. … Telephone (202) 482-4663, e-mail: nancy.hesser@mail.doc.gov. Applications may also be submitted via fax to (202) 482-2718 by August 2, 2004.
69 FR 29928Commerce DepartmentTechnology AdministrationJohn Bender, M.D.; Decision and Order
Federal Register · Notice · Feb 13, 2026
Drug Enf't Admin., 419 F.3d 477, 482 (6th Cir. 2005). … Raich, 545 U.S. at 12-14.
91 FR 6891Justice DepartmentDrug Enforcement AdministrationFederal Register · Notice · Apr 1, 1996
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Panfeld or the analyst listed under Antidumping Proceeding at: Office of Antidumping Compliance, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. … Contact: Todd Peterson at (202) 482-4195 A-412-805 The United Kingdom Sodium Thiosulfate Objection Date: February 8, 1996 Objector: Calabrian Corporation Contact: Lyn Johnson at (202) 482-5287.
61 FR 14291Commerce DepartmentOpposition Brief — Holloway v. Walker
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986
The Superior Oil Co., 482 S.W.2d 883 (Tex. Civ. … Goode, 423 U.S. 362 (1976), personal participation, affirmative promotion of a policy which sanctions the type of action which caused the violation, see Duchesne v.
479 U.S. 984
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.