Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.24s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 6, 2016
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to approve the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 111(d)/129 negative declaration for the state of Nebraska, for existing sewage sludge incinerator … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
81 FR 414Environmental Protection AgencyAirworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Helicopters
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 28, 2020
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM); reopening of comment period. … for safety in air commerce.
85 FR 23492Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation AdministrationFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 24, 2025
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP). … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
90 FR 34812Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 17, 1999
Therefore, EPA is today also proposing to convert its conditional approval of Pennsylvania's enhanced I/M program SIP revisions to full approval, in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act … EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
64 FR 32457Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 8, 2014
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 8, 2014. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
79 FR 46384Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; California; South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 31, 2025
) concerning a rule submitted to address section 185 of the Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”) with respect to the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or “standard”). … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
90 FR 36003Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 27, 1997
The USEPA is proposing to correct their designations from nonattainment nonclassified/incomplete data to attainment/unclassified for ozone pursuant to section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act (the Act), … Please be aware that the USEPA will institute another comment period on this action only if warranted by significant revisions to the rulemaking based on any comments received in response to the direct
62 FR 14660Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 28, 2023
Air Act (CAA) Section 173(c). … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
88 FR 66733Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Minnesota; Bulk Silos FESOP Update
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 7, 2022
The request is approvable because it satisfies the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
87 FR 20370Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 20, 2016
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 19, 2016. … Such control measures may include paving, vegetating, watering, or chemically stabilizing traffic paths; periodic cleaning of paved roads; wet suppression at bulldozing sites and soil piles; vehicle washing
81 FR 3078Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 15, 2010
SUMMARY: Pursuant to a proceeding for reconsideration, the EPA requests comment on a Clean Air Act (CAA) rule, the New Source Review (NSR) Aggregation Amendments, which was promulgated on January 15, … period or if the grounds for the objection arose after the comment period.
75 FR 19567Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 14, 2011
Air Act. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
76 FR 20906Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Minnesota; Rules Update
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 10, 2011
These actions are approvable because they are consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA regulations. DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 9, 2011. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
76 FR 49391Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 30, 2019
The EPA is proposing to approve these SIP revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 29, 2019. … Air Interstate Rule NO X Annual Trading Program; 10 CSR 10-6.364 Clean Air Interstate Rule NO X Ozone Season Trading Program; and 10 CSR 10-6.366 Clean Air Interstate Rule SO 2 Annual Trading
84 FR 36859Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants: South Carolina
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 24, 1999
The Plan was submitted by the South Carolina DHEC to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by September 23, 1999.
64 FR 46165Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 23, 2006
This action is taken in accordance with the Montreal Protocol and the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments on the rule must be received on or before September 22, 2006. … Congress then enacted, and President Bush signed into law, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA of 1990), which included Title VI on Stratospheric Ozone Protection, codified as 42 U.S.C.
71 FR 49395Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; TN; Montgomery County Limited Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 23, 2021
/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. … Summary of EPA's Proposed Action In accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), EPA is proposing to approve the Montgomery County Area LMP for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, adopted by TDEC on June
86 FR 52864Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality Department; Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaning
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 21, 2025
We are proposing to approve the rule revisions under the Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action. … “State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,” 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992). B.
90 FR 40791Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 3, 2009
rule which incorporates Clean Air Act (CAA), section 129 requirements. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
74 FR 38384Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 3, 2009
units into one rule which incorporates Clean Air Act (CAA), section 129, requirements. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
74 FR 38385Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.