Documents

Oral argument — Johnsonr v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2005

This is not something that was promulgated according to the Magnuson Act rulemaking. It doesn't have the force of law. … The first sentence says, no major changes were made in the final rule due to comments received on the proposed rule. This change was not made due to comments. We know that.

Oral argument — Tracy Costa v. Nancy Berryhill

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2017

He treated her for migraine headaches over the period of time. … There were some very broad statements made, and I understand one basis or, you know, he's factoring in the comments, the statements, the history of the patient.

Oral argument — EEOC v. Propak Logistics, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2014

EEOC acted reasonably when it filed this lawsuit. … You didn't appeal the latches determination and the district court rested its attorney's fee award on whether the EEOC acted unreasonably, page 10 of its order, acted unreasonably by initiating litigation

Oral argument — United States v. Leung

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 30, 2004

And I agree that if we were, if this Court were riding on a clean slate, it's clear from your dissent in Campos that you would find differently than the state of the lie is. … Your Honor, just a few comments about Murillo. I don't agree with counsel's interpretation of Murillo. I don't think that it expanded the law or that it added anything new.

Oral argument — United States v. Samory Monds

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2019

I don't read Judge Gritzner's comment as he wasn't exercising his discretion. … But that sort of colloquy is good evidence that the district judge understood he was acting within his discretion. I want to focus just a bit on this question of the closing argument that Mr.

Oral argument — People v. Carter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2011

And so the issue is not as clean as it would be if there was no explanation, if it was just a statement contrary to a statement that had been made before without any explanation. … And finally, just one comment regarding the sentencing issue.

Oral argument — United States v. Jordan Bowers

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2026

And in our view, the district court did not clearly air in finding that the defendant did not act in self-defense. A couple of important facts from the record to put on the table here. … And even if, um, this court may or may not have decided the issue differently in the first instance, uh, under the clear air air standard, we think that any error here certainly was not clear.

Oral argument — Affordable Recovery Housing v. City of Blue Island

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2017

Are they up in the air or what? … Do you have any comment on that? No, I think, unfortunately, the attorneys didn't...

Oral argument — Bradley v. ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2016

With the Court's permission, I would like to address the Appellant's 34-Act Claims. Mr. Pazduszynski would address the 33-Act Claims. I would just start just because I noted it. … And therefore, there is no basis under the 1933 Act for a disclosure claim.

Oral argument — United States v. Gregory Berry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013

In the district court's word, the district court was concerned that he was trying to game the system, essentially build air into the proceedings. … He had three attorneys in an eight- to nine-month period. What about the fact that the court itself vacillated?

Oral argument — Edgar Magana Ayala v. Monty Wilkinson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2021

Our first case for argument today is Edgar Magana Ayala against the acting Attorney General Appeal Number 20-2792. We'll hear first from Mr. Heiderscheid for petitioner. Thank you, your honor. … And that would be the additional basis for when Sinaloa came in and cleaned up the cartel later. Because of his affiliation with CJ NG, it put him in the crosshairs of Sinaloa too.

Oral argument — USA Spay v. CVS Caremark Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2016

How do we know what the defendants' knowledge was during the relevant time period of 2006 and 2007? … said, do not act for us.

Oral argument — United States v. Sylvia Diaz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2020

So there wasn't some period of time where they remained in the United States. … Um, and the constitutional protection against vindictiveness only kicks in when the government acts in response to the exercise of protected right.

Oral argument — Bryan Molina-Diaz v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2024

To actually answer the question, you would have to observe the class for a period of time and measure the amount of time the teacher spent teaching versus the nature and number of disruptions by the students … So it seems like you're getting straight to why we should look at that with a clean slate without addressing how lope or bright compels that. So maybe you — I think we need that link.

Oral argument — Greer v. Yavapai County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2006

The damages that come from the unconstitutional search are the tearing up of the house, the trashing of the house, the turning over ash cans or the cleaning up, and the violation of the constitutional … His act of force was to use the mace at that point. The real question on force is whether what he did before that. Evers was the guy that used the force. Correct.

Oral argument — Robert Noble v. Village of Elliott

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2015

There must be some evidence that Lieutenant Miller either acted or failed to act with a deliberate disregard or a reckless disregard for Mr. Noble's constitutional rights. … He didn't lose the ability to sell in that period of time. He chose not to go get his vehicle in that time period, which created more storage fees.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Renner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 29, 2013

But then it goes on to say unless Shelly files a petition to modify within that four-year period. Shelly did file a petition within that four-year period. … Well, the statute says that when a court decides a modification of maintenance, it considers two sets of factors, those in Section 504 of the Marriage Act and those in Section 510, I think it is.

Oral argument — United States v. Alexander Obando, (Consolidated with 17-11276, United States v. Laureano Roberto Quiroz-Mendoza, and 17-11313, United States v. Alfonso Bitaliano Marcillo-Mera, Appellant)

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2018

Because it's not flying in the air? Because Congress has allowed and chose its words. … And therefore, the Coast Guard acted appropriately in checking with the nation of Ecuador, which could not corroborate his claim.

Oral argument — United States v. Keith Jenkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2010

Is this a plein air standard? Should we be applying a plein air standard? … Never mind constructive, just period. Are you going to prosecute me because there's a gun someplace, and you're going to say I controlled it, but I had no intention of controlling it?

Oral argument — Justine Briggs v. Merck Sharp & Dohme

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2015

Natural and probable consequences of his acts. Right. … Now I'd like to comment on Dieter and Section 3731, 18 U.S.C. 3731 which Mr.