Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.74s

  • Oral argument — United States v. Victor Ortiz Alvarez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 2, 2020

    Stokes, wasn't it common for an outside firm to be hired to clean up where they found the meth lab? Wasn't that pretty common? … Here we have a PSR that specifically noted the acetone, specifically cited the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and that there was a violation of that act.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hahn v. McElroy

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2023

    And the representative from Advancing Clean who did the mold remediation testified that he believed people living in the home would have noticed the mold. … In this case, the trial court made some comments to me about the failure to settle on a weak case.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Taylor

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2016

    Are we on plain air review in this case? It's plain air review in this case because the issue of Johnson and anything with respect to 924c3b was not raised below. … And the reason why we don't think that's possible is these crimes, this is not a situation in which different parts of it occurred at different periods of time.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jamesv.Sutliff Saturn

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2012

    As far as a detailing shop, Your Honor, I think you may be aware that certain car buffs out there like to have their cars pretty clean. … That's an awfully long period of time.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Chico Martines

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2014

    There was also air conditioning. There was talk about the extent of the utilities, how the utility bills had gone up to over $1,000 a month. … She was the acting supervisor that day, and she took the pictures of the different plants and the different stages and how they were spread out in the supplement.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sony Electronics v. Guardian Media

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2007

    Your Honor, if you're asking me do I think we should remand the case, based on the comments on the re-examination, I would say no. … So clearly, Your Honor, you do attribute the conduct to the predecessor, because if you didn't do that, it would be like wiping the slate clean, and you would start over.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Groff v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2007

    Groff and the state of California that makes his acts not the acts of the state of California, but the acts of his employer, San Joaquin Helicopters. Mr. … We, notice and comment exists for a reason.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — L'Association des Americains Accidentels v. DOS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2023

    Well, I have two comments. … So, if I can clarify that, Your Honor, so there are, of course, seven voluntary acts listed under 1481. That's the section of the INA that governs and acts of to lose citizenship.

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Lee v. GNC Franchising, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2003

    I understand you're sort of going, that's some of the theories under the Copperwell Doctrine and the Robinson-Patman and the Sherman Act that they can't conspire. … And I think under the theory that the parties are going to have a clean slate in going forward and dealing with one another.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re: DAVIS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2019

    I guess this is more of a comment than a question, but it does seem to me like your client dodged a pretty big bullet here, and there is a point at which error can be clear. I mean. Well, not here. … I am struck by the numerosity of the points, and is cleaning it up later sufficient?

    23 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Tseng

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2009

    Lee if she's standing right next to him during that time period. The sheer volume of calls lends credibility to the fact that, to Mr. … All I would say is I believe the testimony was – Can't you run a good, clean trial down there? We do our best, Your Honor. We do. I don't see that here.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Erica Bojicic v. Richard DeWine

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2022

    To just say we're treated differently, period. Your Honor, we were admonished and told that we were going to get a show cause order, no matter why we should not be. … Your Honor, what we're saying here is if we don't have the opportunity, if people can't say the government's acting in bad faith, they're acting in bad faith.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Pennzoil-Quaker State v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2007

    The taxpayer said, well, in that case, what happened is the taxpayer paid costs in the current years to clean up past contamination, and it was the same theory. … Number two has to do, I think you can categorize it as nexus, and that is in Reynolds in the earlier period, Reynolds didn't have any relationship with its payees in the later period.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Center for the Study of Serv. v. HHS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2017

    Even after, on administrative appeal, the Secretary of the Air Force had said that documents can't be withheld, Air Force officers continued to withhold them. … And we anticipate that the agency has to act in good faith.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Eileen Race v. George Smith

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2022

    She was clean when she went to the hospital. When she went to the hospital, when they finally let her go to the hospital, she was clean. … If that was the reason why they didn't act.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Bowman

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2026

    In this case, the case law, the statute itself, the instructions, and the committee comments all support the People's position. … The two IPIs that are clearly required are 727 and 728, and both of those require causation. 715, actually nothing in the committee comments.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Bragg

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2025

    And in that, um, the Illinois Supreme Court said active participation in the direction of how the proceedings are going, um, is what invites the air. … But it was not random act of violence against members of the community at large.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Treadway v. Otero

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2024

    Otero only withheld her passport for a one-week period. … Well, actually, the bulk of that opinion talks about the idea that the Traffic Victim Protection Act is different, as she says, from the Labor Standards Act.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Richard Samson v. Western Capital Partners, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017

    But the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act defines what an asset is for purposes of execution and for analysis under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, and that's all property of the debtor that's not exempt … Your Honor, I missed your comment. No, I was only getting you used the term fairness earlier on, right? I used the term fairness? Or fair. Yes.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Anfernee Rondeau

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2026

    The first is the sufficiency of the evidence argument that the government failed to prove the requisite sexual act. … Where does your argument fit in on the plain air analysis? I would tend to agree with your earlier comments that really St. Clair isn't categorical.

    21 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.