Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.22s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 23, 2026
Summary of the EPA's Proposed Action In accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), the EPA is proposing to approve the second 10-year Charlotte Area maintenance plan for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS … Air Act, 91 FR 7686.
91 FR 60349Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 16, 2004
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. … EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
69 FR 55790Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 6, 2008
Under authority of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), we are proposing to approve a local rule that requires submission of emission statements from stationary sources that emit volatile … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
73 FR 32274Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations Update To Include New York State Requirements
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 14, 2008
onshore area (COA), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Air Act.
73 FR 13822Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Rules for Open Burning and Incinerators
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 6, 2017
This action will have a beneficial effect on air quality. This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
82 FR 42054Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 15, 2012
These actions are being proposed pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and its implementing regulations. … “State Implementation Plan (SIP) Actions Submitted in Response to Clean Air Act (CAA) Deadlines,” Memorandum from John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality Management Division, October 28, 1992; 6.
77 FR 68087Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 31, 2009
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
74 FR 38154Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 27, 2016
Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). … EPA elects to issue such guidance in order to assist states, as appropriate. 12 “Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and
81 FR 41498Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 5, 1999
Title VI of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAA or the Act), under Section 605(c), originally required the Administrator to promulgate, by December 31, 1999 … According to Section 611(c) of the Act, ``After 30 months after the enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and before January 1, 2015, no product containing [[Page 16382]] a class II substance
64 FR 16373Environmental Protection AgencyUniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces-Phase II
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 3, 2014
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline. EPA and DoD are not obligated to accept or consider late comments. II. … (b) For all vessels, the chain lockers must be cleaned periodically to eliminate accumulated sediments and any potential accompanying pollutants.
79 FR 6117Environmental Protection AgencyDefense DepartmentFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 10, 2004
These actions are being taken under sections 110 and 111 of the Clean Air Act. … EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
69 FR 25869Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Minnesota
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 12, 2001
Air Act. … We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
66 FR 31573Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 13, 2012
EPA has determined that this SIP revision complies with the Clean Air Act and EPA regulations and is consistent with EPA policies. This action is being taken under section 110 of the Act. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
77 FR 35326Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 19, 2014
Background The San Joaquin Valley (SJV) 1 is currently designated as nonattainment for several of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) promulgated by EPA under the Clean Air Act … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
79 FR 28650Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 17, 2000
This plan is intended to fulfill the requirements of section 182(b)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 20, 2000. … This process generally includes a public notice, public hearing, public comment period, and a formal adoption by a state-authorized rulemaking body.
65 FR 8083Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Washington; Olympic Region Clean Air Agency, Recreational Fires
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 24, 2024
of the Clean Air Act. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
89 FR 84842Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 13, 2015
This proposal pertains to the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) infrastructure requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). … The requirements of section 110(a)(2) are summarized below and in EPA's September 13, 2013, memorandum entitled “Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act
80 FR 13312Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 12, 2015
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by March 16, 2015. … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
80 FR 7813Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 17, 2014
We are proposing to approve a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
79 FR 62378Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 11, 2013
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
78 FR 21580Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.