Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Taylor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2016

Are we on plain air review in this case? It's plain air review in this case because the issue of Johnson and anything with respect to 924c3b was not raised below. … And the reason why we don't think that's possible is these crimes, this is not a situation in which different parts of it occurred at different periods of time.

Oral argument — United States v. James Snyder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2023

But here, just the general notion that's put forth in some of the cases relied upon by the defense and in some of the comments, early comments made by the district court, that there's almost a presumption … He was into the statutory period, well into the statutory period, continuing to run his affairs through SRC.

Oral argument — Michael Shreffler v. City of Kankakee

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2023

In 2016, in February of 2016, Michael Shreffler made some comments on a Facebook post that were about a halftime show of the Super Bowl involving Beyonce and the comments were in poor taste but they were … Both of those, both Dumas and Shreffler were reprimanded for their comments and that was a different supervisor? That's correct. Okay.

Oral argument — United States v. Steven Helton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2014

And the district court, when it came time to choose the particular sentence in this case, didn't really provide any analysis of what the proper period of supervised release was. … It couldn't be a number that the court pulled out of thin air. I agree. $5 million, obviously, is what they stole. If I'm looking...

Oral argument — United States v. Phillip George

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2009

there is a duty to register under SORNA as a sentencing commission when it interpreted this provision prior to knowing that DOJ would try to prosecute people prior to implementation, looking at it as a clean … We're the court to accept the argument in the circuits about the gap period between the enactment of SORNA and the AG's clarifying guideline. The government's not proposing that the court does this.

Oral argument — Daniel Gonzalez v. Clark Ducart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2019

which was which was which was misconduct to introduce and which should have I would also say here that what juror number three did by by by imparting all this information to the rest of the jurors was acting … intentional concealment or concealment during jury selection leads to an if juror 3 sat on the jury then then then the issue would be one of bias but since juror 3 was removed we're left with how did her comments

Oral argument — Jeffrey Harper v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2020

that period say the specificity requirement isn't that we don't understand what you're what you're asking for? … What's your comment? Well filing an amended return plus the correct form places us on notice that they are they want this refund based on this section of the statute.

Oral argument — Jennifer A. Hadsall v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2021

Bogardus's comments to Ms. Torgerson that the union, about the union, were to her alone, and he also included issues with the inventory shortage. … It couldn't be produced in that short a period of time. It was produced later.

Oral argument — United States v. Hamann

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2022

But we can also see how much that tainted evidence was necessary to clean up very big questions in the government's case to meet their elements. … Any further comment? Mr.

Oral argument — People v. Courtney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2018

So her comments on the record support that her errors were not strategic and they were not reasonable. … I want to come clean. I had a drug problem. You know, this is my grandfather.

Oral argument — Ricardo Cruz-Calmo v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2022

With respect to the PSG determination, the agency, an immigration judge, acted within his considerable discretion when he found that petitioner's drunk driving offense in 2015 amounted to a particular … But what he found was that whatever it was, your client was able to avoid it for over a month during a period when he was in hiding and he viewed that as substantial evidence that if he went, if he was

Oral argument — Parker Drilling Management Service, Ltd. v. Newton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2019

then you have a complete contradiction and you have read the statute in a very bizarre way, because ordinarily what the Secretary is doing is reading the word applicable Federal law to decide does the Clean … Air Act apply.

Oral argument — Groff v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2007

Groff and the state of California that makes his acts not the acts of the state of California, but the acts of his employer, San Joaquin Helicopters. Mr. … We, notice and comment exists for a reason.

Oral argument — Russell Country Sportsmen v. USFS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2011

Did he just make that up out of thin air? Well, what Judge Haddon did is he ruled on this as a matter of law. … But on the NEPA issue, I guess the issue there really boils down to whether and when the Forest Service can modify an alternative after the close of the comment period without having to prepare an entirely

Oral argument — United States v. Randolph Forrest

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2025

That restitution, of course, was pursuant to the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, which Congress enacted for a very specific purpose. … If I could finish my comment.

Oral argument — Rebecca Snoeyenbos v. Marcia Curtis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2022

It's not a plein air standard of review because we're not challenging the jury's ruling as to the evidence. … It said a specific intended act of expression, not a specified harm. And there's a substantial difference between specified harm and specific intended act of expression. Who specifies the harm?

Oral argument — Tschiggfrie Properties, Ltd. v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2018

Really, they've got a clean, clean record and they're proud of it. They work with the Teamsters, laborers, operators, and the Carpenters Union. … We act like you're supposed to look at five factors. Are you familiar with our case? Yes. Yes. And we act like there's not a per se rule in this circuit. What do you say? Right.

Oral argument — Nafziger v. Board of Education of Staunton Community Unit School District No. 6

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2019

This did clean up an issue across the state, but it also was a monumental change. … Judge Deal, the trial court, deserves defense if this court has to comment on how many times she was evaluated, because that's a fact.

Oral argument — Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017

Are you saying that they're separate acts, or that together they're an act of infringement? Or does it make any difference in your argument? They are two acts of infringement. … So along, you're consuming various amounts of liquid en route to what I hope and imagine is a completely clean colon.

Oral argument — ChampionX v. AIG Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2025

or the Texas Act. … No new parties were added by that time period.