Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.10s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lloyd Leslie Kindred, Petitioner v. T. Cisneros, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 17, 2023
The state appellate court affirmed the convictions and sentences on June 24 14, 2012, and petitioner did not seek review in the California Supreme Court. … McQuiggin, 569 U.S. at 10 399.
Jurisdictional Statement — Nader v. Schaffer
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1976
City of Montgomery, 417 U.S. 556 (1974) . 14, 24 9, 18, 21, 22, 24 18, 24 9, 18 18 11, 23 9, 11, 17, 21 . 8, 10, 17, 20, 22, 24 23 (iii) Page Gray v. … Dec. at App. 24.)
429 U.S. 989Brief for the United States — United States v. Arthur Young & Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1984
United States, 449 U.S. 383, 397-399 (1981). … DCL Inc., 399 F. Supp. 1123 ‘(S.D.N.Y. 1973).
465 U.S. 805Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jun 2, 2026
Common Cause, 588 U.S. 684 (2019) ........................................ 24, 29 Rumsfeld v. … APPENDIX i TABLE OF APPENDICES Page A PPENDIX A — EXCERPTS FROM REMEDIAL HEARING TRANSCRIPT, 3/8/24 . . . . . 1a APPENDIX B — EX. 399 (TEXT THREAD WITH PAUL GRAVES, BENANCIO GARCIA, AND MAIA ESPINOZA,
Amicus Brief — Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1979
— ings were conducted before Arbitrator Jones on May 23, 24, 30 and 31 (A. 110). … NLRB, 399 F.2d 455, 459 (6th Cir. 1968).
440 U.S. 301Opposition Brief — National Ass'n of Radiotelephone Systems v. Federal Communications Commission
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1976
.- 3 Title II (Sections 201-223, 47 U.S.C. 201-223) -- 5, 9, 12, 14, 15, 17 Title III (Sections 301-399, 47 U.S.C. 301-399)-. 15 Section 1, 47 U.S.C. 151_---------- 3,14 Section 2(b), 47 U.S.C. 152 … See Multiple Licensing—Safety and Special Radio Services, 24 FCC 2d 510, 511-513.
425 U.S. 992Opposition Brief — Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004
App. 289, 329-330, 348-351, 358, 396-399, 404. … Id. at 399.
540 U.S. 1103Petition for Writ of Certiorari — XYZ Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237 (24 Cir. 1989) ; sa jadesiapasaaibciaeacaaatatas 19 Upjohn Co. v. … See Upjohn, 449 U.S. at 399-400. See generally Sporck v.
509 U.S. 905Brief for the US As Amicus Curiae — Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the US As Amicus Curiae · 1944
._... » (24 : “. Conclusion. __.~__-__.------- ee Aer wee Ea a ae $1 . . CITATIONS Cases: : : : Se, GO, ae GO, Ws 3 6 ona ene dadkneeceedeeks aces 26 gronson v. … F. (2d) 399 (Ne. 398, R. 7).’ The Clarke article was first brought into prom- inence in respondént’s brief before the circuit court.
322 U.S. 238Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 23, 2020
LEGAL ANAL. 399 (2013) .......................................15 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES – Continued Page MICHAEL S. BARR, HOWELL E. JACKSON & MARGARET E. … Cir. 2017). 33 See Solomon & Zaring, After the Deal, supra at 399–406.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Deandre Blackman, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 29, 2025
But it 3 No. 24-5517, United States v. … Guthrie, 4 No. 24-5517, United States v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Coinbase, Inc., Petitioner v. Abraham Bielski
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 27, 2023
, 2016 Date 821 Fed.Appx. 753 July 24, 2020 816 F.3d 587 Citation 2a Case Name The Thomas KinKade Co. v. … Applicable 669 Fed.Appx. 487 October 13, 2016 668 Fed.Appx 777 Reversed Reversed 473 Fed.Appx. 793 June 12, 2012 859 Fed.Appx. 31 Affirmed Not Applicable 772 Fed.Appx. 569 June 28, 2019 855 Fed.Appx. 399
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tobalina v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1974
Massachu- setts.” (413 U.S. at 24). … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S.399; Win- ters v. New York, 333 U.S. 507.
419 U.S. 926Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Dragna v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1953
State Bar, 4 Cal. 24 399... sss 20 In re Polizetto, 128 Cal. 410....................... 93 Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U.S.451........... . 13,12 90 Palko v. … Ed. 840 13, 24 Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25, 93 L.
344 U.S. 921Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Quentin Perry, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 22, 2019
United States, 564 U.S. 1 (2011) ................................................ 23, 24 Taylor v. … Id. at ¶¶ 15, 24.
Petitioners Brief — United States ex rel. Carrollo v. Bode
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1953
Uhl, 107 F. 2d 399, 400... 10 U. S. ex rel. Iorio vs. Day, 34 F. 2d 920 —.. 15 U. S. ex rel. Manzella vs. Zimmerman, 71 F. … The petitioner has resided in the United States since January 24, 1906 (R. 39).
346 U.S. 857Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2022
Jan. 24, 2022). The recent decision by the three-judge U.S. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) and Cooper v. Harris, 137 S. Ct. 1455 (2017). A.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 24, 2025
Nos. 24-109, 24-110 In the Supreme Court of the United States _____________ LOUISIANA, Appellant, v. PHILLIP CALLAIS, et al., _____________ Appellees. PRESS ROBINSON, et al., Appellants, v. … Perry that “[a] State cannot remedy a § 2 violation through the creation of a noncompact district.” 548 U.S. 399, 431 (2006).
Hours of Service of Drivers: Application for Exemption; Motion Picture Association
Federal Register · Notice · Nov 3, 2022
In addition, MPA members are required to submit their RODS within 24 hours, rather than waiting for the 13-day period allowed by 49 CFR 395.8. … carriers and drivers are subject to the following terms and conditions: (1) Motor carriers and drivers must comply with all other applicable Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (49 CFR part 350-399
87 FR 66362Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationPrologue — Patti v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005
United States, 399 F.3d 1266 (10th Cir. 2005) ....... 12 Blakely v. … :ccccccceeeeeeee 26 STATUTES SI ne ee ee 17, 24 ff eb Fe Naar aren eben rr ee Be 2 i cthccinesicncecsncinsteestliasheeieciipaiiiliiiadibiadeibtacie -++.
546 U.S. 1033
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.