Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.46s
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Las Vegas Valley Carbon Monoxide Attainment Plan
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 9, 2006
The plan disapproval will not trigger any Clean Air Act 179(b) sanctions. … Air Act.
71 FR 26910Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 19, 2002
All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 69688Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 2, 1996
Air Act Amendments. … Air Act.
61 FR 3821Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 2, 2010
We are proposing action on local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Air Act.
75 FR 45082Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 23, 2005
Air Act. … Air Act.
70 FR 70751Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Uncategorized Document · Jul 15, 1994
Background The air quality planning and SIP requirements for ozone nonattainment and transport areas are set out in subparts I and II of Part D of Title I of the Clean Air Act, as amended by the CAA … Air Act, as amended, and EPA regulations in 40 CFR part 52.
Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 7, 2002
EPA is approving this revision to the SIP in accordance with the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 62381Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Feather River Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 1, 2012
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. … Air Act.
77 FR 12493Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 29, 2009
EPA is approving these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … SAFETEA-LU revised certain provisions of section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act, related to transportation conformity.
74 FR 19451Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 12, 2007
Division, September 4, 1992; • “State Implementation Plan (SIP) Actions Submitted in Response to Clean Air Act (Act) Deadlines,” Memorandum from John Calcagni Director, Air Quality Management Division … Air Act.
72 FR 1474Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 30, 2000
The Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD) adopted the plan to meet the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for ozone areas classified as serious. … Air Act.
65 FR 16864Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 17, 2008
regulations under the [Clean Air Act (CAA or Act)].” … EPA has determined that this revision is approvable under the Clean Air Act. (i) Incorporation by reference.
73 FR 76560Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 1, 2021
EPA is taking this action pursuant to section 110 and Part C of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 3, 2021. … Requirements of the Clean Air Act and EPA's Regional Haze Rule B. Best Available Retrofit Technology C. Long-Term Strategy and Reasonable Progress Requirements D.
86 FR 17101Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Maintenance Plan Revisions; Ohio
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 20, 2004
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” … National Technology Transfer Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 43319Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 28, 2021
Air Act (CAA) for the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). … The public comment period for this proposed rule ended on August 2, 2021. During the comment period, EPA received two comments on the proposed rule.
86 FR 53550Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 21, 2010
Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), judicial review of this final action is available only by filing a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the … In recognition of these issues, the Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule contains provisions establishing a transition period for developing emission limits for condensable direct PM 2.5 that
75 FR 80118Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 2, 2005
This plan was submitted to meet subparts 1 and 4 Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) planning requirements for the Wallula PM 10 serious nonattainment area. … What Comments Did We Receive on the Proposed Action? EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period on our proposal published in the Federal Register on February 1, 2005.
70 FR 22597Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans: Oregon
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 24, 1998
Air Act (CAA) and 40 CFR part 51. … Air Act and 40 CFR 51.230.
63 FR 39743Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 20, 2000
The revisions comply with the regulations set forth in the Clean Air Act (CAA). Included in this document are revisions to Chapter 335-3-14—Air Permits. … Air Act.
65 FR 56797Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 5, 2004
This action is being taken under sections 107, 110, and 175A of the Clean Air Act. … The redesignation requests and maintenance plans satisfy all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 47366Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.