Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.23s
Brief for Respondent — United States v. Seattle-First National Bank
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1944
Merchants National Trust d Savings Bank, 101 Fed. (2) 399, applied (R. 71). Secondly, the court concluded that as to the real estate there had been no . … The same language was included: in the Rev- enue Act of 1918 (Act of February 24, 1919; 40 Stat. 1057) as Schedule A-7.
321 U.S. 583Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jason Keith Walker, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 26, 2019
Extreme Prosecutorial Misconduct Under Brady, ................................. 24 Giglio, and Napue 1. … Brown, 399 F.3d 972, 984 (9th Cir. 2005) quoting United States v. Zuno-Arce, 339 F.3d 886, 889 (9th Cir. 2003).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Byron Lewis Black, Petitioner v. Tennessee
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 15, 2025
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 417 (1986). … LEXIS 279, at *24 (Tenn. July 8, 2025).
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Aug 17, 1994
.................39394 91...................................................39711 189..................................................39395 257..................................................40836 399 … ...............39440 23 CFR 1212.................................................39256 1313.................................................40470 24
Amicus Curiae Brief — Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
THE COURT BELOW ERRED IN ASSESSING 24 Purdon’s Pa. Statutes §15-1501-C 8 THE SECTARIAN EFFECT OF THE OHIO PILOT 24 Purdon’s Pa. Statutes §20-2001-B 2 SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM IN ISOLATION FROM 38 U.S. … Essex, 342 F Supp 399, 412-413 (SD Ohio), affd, 409 US 808, 34 L Ed 2d 69, 93 S Ct 61 (1972).
536 U.S. 639Reply Brief — Smith v. Stewart
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1974
(b) As construed and applied by the Appellate Court, Ch. 24, §21-27, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969 violates the above Ae COWRA! … Blankenship, 399 Ill. 136, 77 N.E. 2d 325 (1948). 2. Verification of some of the facts on plaintiff’s in- formation and belief is authorized by law. Dial v.
419 U.S. 873Opposition Brief — Bruce Zachary Pugh, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Nov 13, 2020
App. 17-24. petitioner’s appeal, this Court decided Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019). … Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (2020), appears to be at odds with the decision below on the substantive question of whether to recognize forfeited Rehaif errors even when the defendant’s criminal record and period
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 16, 2024
No. 128-1 at 24-25. … No. 24 at 17).
Petition — Hickey v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
(R. 399). The men tied her hands and ankles with plastic cuffs and ransacked her dressing room and bedroom. (R. 402, 403). Mrs. … Masonry, 399 U.S. 42 (1970): United States v. Chadwick, 97 S.Ct. 2476 (1977).
439 U.S. 960Motion to Dismiss — Hicks v. Miranda
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1975
University Committee, 399 U.S. 383; Mitchell v. Donovan, 398 U.S. 427; Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens, Inc., 397 U.S. 820; see also, Roe v. … June 24, 1974).
422 U.S. 332Amicus Curiae Brief — Martins Beach 1, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Surfrider Foundation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 28, 2018
. & Pol’y 171 (2005) ............. 24 Laitos, Jan G., The Takings Clause in America’s Industrial States After Lucas, 24 U. Tol. L. … New York City, 438 U.S. 104, 123-24 (1978)).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Broxstonie Demichael Mitchell, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 3, 2025
Id. at 24. … See Petition for Writ of Certiorari at 22–24, Garland v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gobeille v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 135 S. Ct. 885 (2014) (No. 14-181)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Comm. on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Office of Oversight and Investigations (June 24, 2009) (“Sen- ate Report’). … Moran, 536 U.S. 355, 399, n.11 (2002) (quoting Travelers, 514 U.S. at 659). B. The Vermont Statute Does Not “Relate To” ERISA Plans.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pedro Alvarado, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 16, 2021
UNITED STATES, 554 U.S. 237, 243-244, 128 S.CT. 2559, 171 L.ED, 2D 399 (2008)? III. … UNITED STATES, 55A U.S. 23*7, 243-244, 128 S.CT..2559, 171 L.ED. 2D 399\(2008)?" \ Greenlaw v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — James Richards, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 6, 2023
Schriro, Carrillo-Gonzales, Washington, 179 F. 3d 616, 620 (8th Cir 1999) 24 24 24 21 26 627 Fed Appx 366 [LEXIS' page 4] :( 5th/llth Cir 2015)............................. 9 2d 319 [LEXIS … See California v Green, 399 US 149, 162, 26 L Ed 2d 489, 90 S Ct 1930 (1970).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kendall v. City of Visalia
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
National Fire Insurance Company (1944) 25 Cal2d 399, 409-410, 154 P2d 399; and Elkins v. … See CT 397 - 399, at 399. The City filed no declaration on costs or time spent.)
507 U.S. 988Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 22, 2024
Id. at 399. … Id. at 399.
Appendices — Long Island Island Savings Savings Bank, FSB v. United States (No. 07-1234)
Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 2008
Home Savings IV, 399 F.3d at 1350. … See Tr. 397:12 to 399:8 (Test. of Fuster).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cantu v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
Wainwright, 422 F.2d 145 (Sth Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 927 (1969). … Oct. 24, 1985.
479 U.S. 847Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 30, 2023
399-402]; [2 CR 361364]. Tex. Est. Code §101.001(a)(1). … [2 CR 11-24! 96! 99! 117-118! 130-131!
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.