Documents

Oral argument — People v. Zimmerman

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2010

And the fact that there are many more situations where the legislature meant it to be a sentence enhancement shows that the legislature is acting carefully in that regard. … that includes some elements and some sentence enhancements, according to the committee comments.

Oral argument — Gluckstadt Holdings, L.L.C. v. VCR I, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2019

Whether or not, because of the settlement agreement, the trustee acted improperly. … The purchaser has got title to the property, assisted by what Gluckstadt Holdings did to clean the title up when it was still acting as the fixer in this case.

Oral argument — In re: Iconix International Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2025

It doesn't focus on these after-the-fact acts. … An offense happens over a fixed period of time. Maybe a moment in time, maybe over five years. But there's sort of a before, during, and after.

Oral argument — Mejia-Castanon v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 30, 2018

So if there are bad acts that take place after the 10-year period and during the time of adjudication in front of the court, this is a discretionary application, and bad acts should always be taken into … That period is that ten-year period with all the parameters put in place with the Immigration Act, the parameters that includes the stop-time rule, that includes the period of time immediately preceding

Oral argument — United States v. Gregory Berry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013

In the district court's word, the district court was concerned that he was trying to game the system, essentially build air into the proceedings. … He had three attorneys in an eight- to nine-month period. What about the fact that the court itself vacillated?

Oral argument — In Re: SageCrest II LLC and Sa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2019

And it relied upon principles of a case called Sound Air, which is a Canadian case, which talks about the integrity of the process. … So counsel's comments today that the bid would have been higher is based upon facts not in the record and facts which were never proven.

Oral argument — Brian Newton v. Parker Drilling Mgmt. Svcs.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2017

Or meal periods. Okay. … Supreme Court held that OXLA does not apply for that time period where they're commuting from the shore. So that answers that question.

Oral argument — Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Ocwen Financial Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2022

So what exactly then did Ocwen buy in this interim period? … It provides that ACWA has to kind of keep its nose clean for the violation. The defined term is potential violation. And if it does that, then it's not subject to penalties.

Oral argument — Johnsonr v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2005

This is not something that was promulgated according to the Magnuson Act rulemaking. It doesn't have the force of law. … The first sentence says, no major changes were made in the final rule due to comments received on the proposed rule. This change was not made due to comments. We know that.

Oral argument — Darden v. Colbea Enterprises, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2025

The Wage Act provides for payment of earned wages within a six- to seven-day period. … It does speak to the Wage Act. I want you to think beyond that. How should we interpret wages earned in the Wage Act? If we're just starting from a clean slate.

Oral argument — In re Committment of Spetnagel

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2014

I think an important part of this is my invited air argument. Answer the question first. Yes. So that's your point. Yes. … I think particularly important in this case, it was the invited air argument, and I think that's very important. It's also important.

Oral argument — People v. Peterson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2015

Second, I want to turn to the Stacey's comments, also which were allowed in by the forfeiture by Warren doing doctor. … Not he cleaned up the scene. Not any of that. Drew killed Kathleen. Not even Drew said he killed Kathleen. It was totally inadmissible evidence.

Oral argument — 35574 Sletteland v. Blendu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2004

During the period, after the period of time it was stayed, we began discovery, and we deposed Mr. Blendew. And after I deposed Mr. Blendew, I moved to the court to allow to amend the complaint. … I'll just – most of this will be addressed to the comments of Mr. Troutmate. With regard to the last one, first of all, I don't understand why Mr.

Oral argument — Adams and Associates, Inc. v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2017

I understand that the time period for getting all this done was a very truncated time period. They had a Federal Government contract and so they had to make a lot of decisions very fast. … Again, this is because we're in that short time period, transition period, that they assisted in that interview, gave the information to Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Dwayne Frazier

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2014

Frazier over that extended period and could see Mr. Frazier deteriorate. … All of his urinalyses were clean. Then, during the Rule 11 college- I think that helps your case. I think it does. That he's acting crazy, but he's not taking illegal drugs.

Oral argument — Ronald Barton v. Constellium Rolled Products

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2017

But remember, this is a collective bargaining agreement, and these are governed by the National Labor Relations Act. … But in this case, it's not a clean inference. Well, neither are the inferences you're asking us to draw about the impact of the cap language.

Oral argument — Ciara Vesey v. Envoy Air, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2020

And we'll move to our third case this morning, which is Ciara Vesey versus Envoy Air. All right, I see Ms. Aiken and Ms. Fiore, so you may proceed, Ms. Aikens. Thank you, Your Honor. … Massengarb's entirely inappropriate comments. Correct. Okay. Yes.

Oral argument — Gaudin v. Remis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2004

The wrongful act that is attacked as the symptom to the thing that has to be fixed is the habitual residence. … Any other questions or comments? Thank you, counsel, both of you, for your argument in this matter. The matter just argued will be submitted.

Oral argument — Lawrence Jefferson v. GDCP Warden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2018

Well, I think when you look at the record as a whole, that you can't say no competent counsel would have acted as trial counsel did. … He just said, he made a comment that he didn't know. He was never confronted with it. He did say. An explanation. He had an explanation about the billing.

Oral argument — Padilla v. Lever

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2006

If I could ask a question and also make a procedural comment, if people could stay close to the mic. … So much of this — I can assure you that there are many, many requirements to putting an airplane in the air, and they are quite specific about it.