Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Marlean A. Ames, Petitioner v. Ohio Department of Youth Services

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 16, 2024

Colorado, 580 U.S. 206 (2017)........................................ 5, 24 People v. Hall, 4 Cal. 399 (1854) ............................................ 8 Pierce v. … Hall, 4 Cal. 399, 405 (1854) (rejecting the admissibility of Chinese witnesses and smearing Chinese individuals in offensive terms).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arthur G. Jaros Jr., Petitioner v. Village of Downers Grove, Illinois, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 23, 2021

(App. 12, ¶ 24). … (App. 124, ¶ 24).

Amicus Curiae Brief — In Re Grand Jury

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2022

Cal. 2019) . . . . . . . . 24 Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 892 F.3d 1264 (D.C. Cir. 2018). . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Fisher v. … Cory, 683 F.2d 1201 (8th Cir. 1982). . . . . . . . . . . . 14, 24 Swidler & Berlin, 524 U.S. 399 (1998). . . . . . . . . . . . . 8, 9, 15, 21, 23 United States v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 10, 2025

No. 24-297 In the Supreme Court of the United States ________________ TAMER MAHMOUD, ET AL., v. Petitioners, THOMAS W. … Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923) (emphasis added). 27 Pierce v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cisco Systems, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Doe I, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 27, 2026

Rec. 6670 (Mar. 24, 1987) (statement by Sen. … Rev. 399, 407 (2010). Clear statement rules come with a cost – often described as a “clarity tax.” E.g., Biden v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gilbert P. Hyatt, Petitioner v. John A. Squires, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 6, 2026

Cir. 2002). ............5 In re Gibbs, 437 F.2d 486 (CCPA 1971)....................10 In re Henriksen, 399 F.2d 253 (CCPA 1968) ............20 In re Hogan, 559 F.2d 595 (CCPA 1977) ..................12 … Kenyon Bearing & AP Co., 153 F. 2d 516 (2nd Cir. 1946) ......... 9, 24 iii Raleigh & Gaston R. Co. v.

Petition — First National Bank & Trust Co. in Alton v. Berke

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

App. 2d 399, 158 N.E. 2d 103 12 Lusietto v. King, 107 Ill. App. 2d 239, 246 N.E. 2d 24 13 McCormick v. Burt, 9S Hil. 263 ..............ccc0e, 12 Miils v. … Ed. 2d 24.

Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Whitmore v. Pennsylvania Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1943

City of Boston, 142 Mass. 24 (6 N. E. 840); Minns v. Billing, 183 Mass. 126 (66 N. E. 593, 5 DL. R. A. N. … S. 399, p. 415), but at the same time as the respondent’s claim was heard, and at the time set on their own petition for a hearing of their case.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Travis Miles, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 21, 2020

Ct. 399 (2018) ............................................ 5, 11 Appellate Court Cases: Brumbach v. United States, 929 F.3d 791 (6th Cir. 2019) ............................. 5-6 Carter v. … Ct. 399 (2018), indicated that Tennessee aggravated burglary also qualified as a generic burglary under the ACCA. (Id.). Finding that reasonable jurists could not debate whether Mr.

Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Johnson v. Kersh Lake Drainage District

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1942

S. 399 ; Pa cet 20 : Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U. S. 64 scinacicacte aa Great Western Telegraph Co. v. Burnham, 162 U. S. 339.......--_-__...._ 20 : Grubb v. … Patterson, 263 U. 8. 399, 402; Seagraves v. Wal- lace, 69 F. 2d 163, 164, 165.

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Safeway Stores, Inc. v. West

Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1950

Company, 24 F. (2d) 671 Kramer v. Mills Lumber Company, 24 Fed. (2d) 313 Brown v. Dorney Park, 167 Fed. (2d) 453 In the case of Johnson v. United States, 333 U. … Ct. 399, and Sweeney v. Erving, 228 U. S. 233, 33 8. Ct. 416.

Opposition Brief — Hill v. Jennings (No. 07-43)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007

Dist., 399 F.3d 1279 (11th I. ITUIII dace kde ccc anibebsdcdehomnbibsbticta acl ab boauastaaSalawicode 1] Texas v. Mead, 465 U.S. 1041 (1984) veccccccccsssecceseeeeree 7 United States v. … Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 588-5180 Counsel for Respondent August 24, 2007 * Counsel of Record

Opposition Brief — Dico, Inc. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002

Lowe, 118 F.3d 399, 401- 403 (5th Cir. 1997), and Ailantic Richfield Co. v. Ameri- can Airlines, Inc., 98 F.3d 564, 568 (10th Cir. 1996)). … [Section 101(24), 42 U.S.C. 9601(24) (emphasis added by the court)].

Opposition Brief — Westfall v. Southwest Airlines Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993

.+4++5: Fa er cd sn dade S e's eos 40 beus SCP MENS 24 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Sup-CeR. 10....2cccccccccsvvcvcseseveevavsvesceeses 24 eS Se) eperere rrr errr rere ere eee err ere ] Sup.Ct.R. … Vol. 2, pp. 399-400, Plaintiff's Opposition To Defen- dant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Exhibit P).° On or about January 3, 1991, Mr.

Reply Brief — Stollings v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1975

Res. 399—Pub. Res. 101) c. 586, 45 Stat. 1540, 1541 (2a) wees 16 ili PAGE The ED ssetiesicsnerniidiinicatpuih viciouiieianicbilaianbinimabiaciions 20 BU Ti eatin’ FA. … Resolution 399—Pub. Res.

Motion for leave to intervene as petitioner — Joshua Clay McCoy, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated as a Class, et al., Petitioners v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Motion for leave to intervene as petitioner · Apr 29, 2026

Iowa, 419 U.S. 393, 399 (1975) (finding that the mootness of the individual petitioners’ claims due to the passage of time did not render the case moot for the previously certified class they were representing … P. 24(b)(1)(A).

Petition — Horton v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983

C. 1227 South Seventh Street Post Office Box 399 Springfield, IIlinois 62705 Telephone: 217/544-9823 CASEY & CASEY Attorneys at Law 2020 Timberbrooke Springfield, Illinois 62702 Te:ephone … Respectfully submitted, ALEXANDRA DE Saint PHALLE Lonprigan & Porter, P.C. 1227 South Seventh Street Post Office Box 399 Springfield, Illinois 62705 Telephone: 217/544-9823 Casey & Casey Attorneys

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cory Jermaine White, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 30, 2024

Johnson, 399 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir. 2005); United States v. Munchel, 991 F.3d 1273, 1281 (D.C. Cir. 2021). 7 United States v. Dai, No. 23-8081, 2024 WL 1749883, at *1 (2d Cir. … Diallo, No. 24-1255 (9th Cir. Apr. 17, 2024); United States v. Le, No. 24-1079 (9th Cir. Apr. 3, 2024); United States v. Chavez, No. 23-1796 (9th Cir. Sept. 20, 2023); United States v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 1981), cert denied sub nom., Taylor v. … Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla.). cert dented sub. nom., Taylor v.

Petition — Alabama v. McCrary

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983

Ed. 24 36z,. 102 S. Ct. (1982) ------------- 25,31,34 Kahally v. State, 254 Ala. 482, 48 So. 24 794 (1950) «<<------- 5,6,19- 22,24,29 Kolender v. Lawson, 51 U.S. L. … Johns-Manville Corp., 399 So. 2d 263, (S.Ct. Ala., 1981) iain tint cael 32 United States v. National Dairy Products Corp., . ’ 9 L. Ed. 2d 561, 83 S.