Documents

Oral argument — Young v. Reiman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2010

After airing a lengthy, complicated case this morning, it was a dog bite. The child was five when bitten, not when he went to trial. … There is a more recent case, 96 case, that follows the comments of this IPI, Eyring v. Johnson.

Oral argument — Kevin Waine-Golston v. Time Warner-Advance/Newhouse

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2015

Well, you don't disagree that rounding on a neutral basis is permitted under both California law and the Fair Labor Standards Act? No, your honor, we disagree. … Counsel, the other side gave us the impression that the judge just picked this out of the air and it came out of nowhere. No, sir, not at all.

Oral argument — Lawrence Jefferson v. GDCP Warden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2018

Well, I think when you look at the record as a whole, that you can't say no competent counsel would have acted as trial counsel did. … He just said, he made a comment that he didn't know. He was never confronted with it. He did say. An explanation. He had an explanation about the billing.

Oral argument — Padilla v. Lever

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2006

If I could ask a question and also make a procedural comment, if people could stay close to the mic. … So much of this — I can assure you that there are many, many requirements to putting an airplane in the air, and they are quite specific about it.

Oral argument — International Union v. Trane U.S. Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020

There are two arbitrator acts that are at issue at this case. … And that's why we are within 90 days of the arbitrator's final act.

Oral argument — United States v. Shipp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2022

So if meetings with jurors in chambers, which will result in their excusal from the panel, is not voir dire, then surely administrative logistical remarks, even about COVID cleaning protocols, should not … And this court should not take the government's comment in oral argument that we all knew, but he can't recall how they knew, as somehow part of the record.

Oral argument — Gamez-Morles v. Pacific NW Renal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2008

The question is whether the Americans with Disabilities Act requires that it be done. … Because you're relying on a policy that's somewhat in the air. Now we're talking about there's nothing in writing but there's a declaration.

Oral argument — Joel Alcox v. Jeffrey Beard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2014

Let me get back to this first period, though. … The reaction, the initial comments of Lothery that he acted surprised in some. And Lothery is very crafty. And it was apparent from evidence that Lothery knew that they were being monitored.

Oral argument — Page Plus Of Atlanta Snap Prepaid LLC v. Owl Wireless LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2013

It is important to know that this case was preceded by an earlier case filed by PPA and another unrelated corporation called Air Link in 2010. … In other words, an assignment, like so many things that are — that courts and lawyers deal with, it's a legal act, and there are requirements to determine whether that legal act has happened or not happened

Oral argument — United States v. Pirouz Sedaghaty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2012

The preliminary comment would be to note my objection to the court's scheduling of an ex parte argument with the government. … And the reason I want to refer to the sentencing is that on the tax loss issue, we believe this Court will be writing on a clean slate.

Oral argument — Deborah Slayton v. Carolyn Colvin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2015

This is a clean case. There is very little else involved. This is one issue, the claimant's credibility. The court has previously held in Carradine v. … Let me, well, moving on to the SSI information or time period, did any doctors opine or disagree with the residual functional capacity as found by the ALJ?

Oral argument — American Guarantee & Liability Ins. Co. v. Lexington Ins. Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2013

In that case, the subcontractor employee who was injured was working on an air conditioning unit on the roof of a building. … In Sciufi, there was no possible way of saying that the air conditioning subcontractor had anything to do with the faulty hatch.

Oral argument — Donovan v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2019

His symptoms progressed over a two- to three-week period, which is consistent with what his testimony was. … If I could just briefly comment.

Oral argument — Linza v. Saul

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2020

This is a complicated aspect of the Social Security Act, but that would be one instance where wholly would be doing work. … So it's basically 16 years of hiring, and there's a limited number of dual-status technicians, but this is the period when more of them have been from that period are retiring.

Oral argument — The Highview Group, Ltd. v. William Ryan Homes, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2019

You have to come with clean hands. Mr. Swerdow doesn't come with clean hands. He accused Mr. Ryan of stealing. That was his original, he had fraud case. … That was a period of about two weeks. And Mr. Swartow had been working on this project since 2010 for over four years. And Mr.

Oral argument — Edwin Van Dorn v. Scott Hunter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2018

Or did he act on the knowledge that there was no one in the bite? I think he acted on the knowledge that no one was in the bite, but that goes to the fact of the movement of the wire. … What's up in the air? The wires are up there, but the static wire is there as well. Secondly- If the poles are down, how are the wires still in the air? They're not in there.

Oral argument — Adam U. Steines v. Westgate Palace, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2024

Over a period of two years in a building, in one of 207 apartments in the building. That's correct, Your Honor. … Well, I'm not paying it off over an extended period of time because I basically I have it for an extended period of time. I have access for one week every other year for an extended period of time.

Oral argument — DirecTV, Inc. v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2015

And in all of those cases, they make clear that the mere fact that conduct is prejudicial to an employer does not remove it from the act. That's not consistent with the way the act is structured. … Just looking at the facts of this case, the board points to the fact that it's undisputed that the employees did not have a chance to see the TV program before it was aired.

Oral argument — People v. Noland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2023

As a result of that comment, the court decided that Mr. … This honorable court should therefore examine the record for plain air. And the defendant here is seeking plain air under the first prong plain air rule.

Oral argument — Khalil v. President United States of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2025

Are they acting unreasonably? Is the system acting unreasonably in saying there needs to be somewhere where this can be brought before someone can be spirited out of the country? … And what it said is the reason that it's collateral is that it will deprive the plaintiffs of rights protected by the First Amendment during the period of appellate review.