Documents

Oral argument — Chicago Board of Education v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2022

One, you could set aside the order that you have and send it back for the commission to clean this up. … The law, the act, the Workers' Comp Act, specifically says that there needs to be a link between arising out of the employment and the injury, not the employment and the accident.

Oral argument — Oplinger v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2016

That there was a different deciding official, a different time period. … There were details about whether he cleaned the gun. We read the record. Yes, a rifle. Yes, thank you.

Oral argument — Tracy Costa v. Nancy Berryhill

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2017

He treated her for migraine headaches over the period of time. … There were some very broad statements made, and I understand one basis or, you know, he's factoring in the comments, the statements, the history of the patient.

Oral argument — People v. Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 17, 2016

is Johnny Taylor says the man who was shooting at me was clean-shaven Then he identifies Dennis Davis's picture and that picture was the picture taken when he was arrested for not having a valid license … actually act Appropriately and effectively will give Dennis good representation and not allow statements like Colton Greene's to come in where he testifies that Dennis has been in and out of jail for

Oral argument — Sunnyside Gold Corporation v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2018

That's a fair comment, Your Honor. In this case, the only scoring has been of observed surface releases. That was the EPA's position. … Ultimately, I'm assuming it's evaluated as clean, but there's a lot of heartache that happens between now and then. You're listed on the NPL.

Oral argument — Glenda Westmoreland v. TWC Administration LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2019

She needed the date in the prior week because she hadn't cleaned out the form, and there were two dates misrepresented. … That's absolutely true, but it was not a dishonest act. It was done for the fact that she wanted the – It's not a dishonest act? No, Your Honor. It was to reflect the date the one-on-one occurred.

Oral argument — Justine Briggs v. Merck Sharp & Dohme

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2015

Natural and probable consequences of his acts. Right. … Now I'd like to comment on Dieter and Section 3731, 18 U.S.C. 3731 which Mr.

Oral argument — Sant v. Stephens

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2020

But I don't think even if you could find that was within the three year period, that it would save the First Amendment retaliation claim in this case. … So it's simply a matter of cleaning up municipal records as far as that goes. It's perfectly logical on the record what happens. Okay, anything else?

Oral argument — United States v. Omnicare

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2017

a consultant so is it fair to say that you did not discover that the fraud was taking place you you just took public information and made it more precise that we would not go ahead and correct my my comment … this court observed in the Schumann case and that is not sufficient to establish direct and independent knowledge sufficient to establish yourself as an original source what about the post 2010 time period

Oral argument — Daniel Medici v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2017

So the total period is how long? … Consistent with the way the military, the navy The air force. Pardon? Consistent with the policies that are in place in the military For the navy, the air force and the marines.

Oral argument — United States v. Rosario-Perez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2016

to the ones charged in the indictment is the type of comment that cannot also be erased by a limiting instruction. … The brief states all of the judge's comments, but the judge recognizes that that was impossible to comply with.

Oral argument — Hernandez v. Sessions

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 30, 2017

The agency found that the FARC threatened her for a long period of time, and she resisted. Finally, she acceded. FARC members came to her store every few months. They demanded goods. Right. … But it wasn't like they came in one time and just cleaned out her shelves. Over a period of two years, every three months or so, she would acquiesce in providing them food and merchandise, right?

Oral argument — Leanna Smith v. State of Arizona

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2015

That entire series of events is one general act. … Every one of those people was acting as part of the State's investigation, and their acts are the acts, essentially, of the State, at least according to their complaint.

Oral argument — Ryll v. Merck

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2004

What they said was one comment by one individual that no one else knew about was not enough. … Rather, the jury is there to determine whether the employer acted reasonably. And how do you act reasonably?

Oral argument — Rhead v. Mundy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003

And they took me to the fire station instead of the hospital first and cleaned me up and then took me to the hospital. And they were also, they never Mirandized me. … We appreciate your comments. You have two minutes left, so if you'd like to have a seat while you're on the other side. Okay, I will. Mr. Reed, why don't you have a seat at the counsel table? Mr.

Oral argument — Cliff Mosco v. Motricity Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2016

So roughly I'm going to try to leave him around five minutes to back clean up. So are you prepared to talk about the registration statement? I am, Your Honor. All right. … I'd like to start with the IPO comments first. I agree that Your Honor should look at exactly what was said, and what you'll see is it's not a statement that referred to the time of the IPO.

Oral argument — People v. Jackson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2014

And I think your job is to do a de novo review of that question, not a plein air review, a de novo review. … A long period of pre-incriminating response during the videotape where the detectives are providing misinformation to Mr. Jackson about everybody's told us that you've done it.

Oral argument — Francisco Ramirez, Jr. v. Pat Vasques

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2014

I think we're about to talk about Sandoval, and I'm interested in your comments. … She was a little bit surprised and then walked into the bathroom to clean herself up. But then her 11-year-old son entered the room, and Mr. Unruh grabbed the boy and placed a gun to his head.

Oral argument — State of New York v. United St

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2020

It's not a notice and comment rulemaking, and it is, even if it were a notice and comment rulemaking, they could change. … And I'm not saying that a court always has to act nationwide under Section 705, but it's authority that it has.

Oral argument — Lori Birckhead v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2019

That was an argument that the petitioners had raised in the comments on the EA. … Truly, this has been an issue that has been challenging to my agency for the two-year temporary period.