Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.16s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Jennings v. Rodriguez, 136 S. Ct. 2489 (2016) (No. 15-1204)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
Walker, I a a ee cc eciwesiny seine 24 Foucha v. Louisiana, I a ea a da niet 17 Gerstein v. Pugh, os on ok bos ea be i eaw a's 21 Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, RS eT eae | 24 INS v. … at 399 n.194 (collecting cases).
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Vuitch
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1971
United States, 354 U.S. 394, 399-400 (1957) Craig v. Rowland, 10 App. D.C. 402 (1897) Daley v. Meier, 33 Ill. App.24 218, 178 N.E.2d 691 (1961) . Damasiewicz v. … Bl. 399, 126 Eng.
402 U.S. 62Opposition — Bell & Howell Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
The election resulted in seven votes for Local 399, and one against (id. at A28). … This doctrine was first enunciated by the Board in Miranda Fuel Company, _Inc.:%9 See Meltzer, supra at p. 24.
442 U.S. 942Application — Jonathan Dunn, Applicant v. Lloyd J. Austin III, Secretary of Defense, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Application · Apr 11, 2022
On August 24, 2021, respondent Austin ordered vaccination of all active-duty and reserve service members against COVID-19. 3 C.A.E.R. 399-400. … ECF 11-1, at 23-24; C.A. ECF 14-1, at 1112.
Reply Brief — The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Oct 15, 2025
McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997) ........................................ 22-23 Riggs v. UCOR, LLC, 2024 WL 3634471 (Aug. 2, 2024, 6th Cir. 2024) ............................... 24 Salliotte v. … Br. 24. To repeat: contractors obtain immunity from suit only if they satisfy the two conditions articulated in Yearsley. Id. at 23–24.
Petitioners Brief, — Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief, · 1966
Vol., pp. 399-440; R. 278). This September 24, 1963, Section 6 Notice, also called ‘‘The Uniform Working Agree- | ment”? (Exh. … Vol., pp. 399-440; R. 278). In regard to the non-operating crafts, the carrier proposed an initial conference on its September 24, 1963, Section 6 Notice for October 18, 1963 (Exh. Vol., p. 400).
384 U.S. 238Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Reid v. Covert
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1956
ed.) §§ 24-409, 24-411), but, since.the reorganization of the District of Columbia Government, he is now subject to the supervision of the Director of the De- | partment of Corrections, who in turn … BS 399, 406. ° In the Krueger case, Jur. St. ‘App. at 16a, tie . district court expréssly rejected the Arniy’s contention.
351 U.S. 487Amicus Curiae Brief — Microsoft Corp. v. AT & T CORP.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Microsoft Corp., 399 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 568 (2005).............-..265 6 Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings v. … Claim 24 of the patent in suit is both illustrative and representative of the patent claims. Claim 24 can be parsed into its constituent elements as follows: sas 24.
550 U.S. 437Reply Brief — John D. Freeman, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 29, 2021
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) .................................................................. 12 Hall v. … A.B. at 24.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Bennett v. Spear
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
See CED hos Hee doreeheeeorecestosceeeses 10 June, The Structure of Standing Requirements for Citizen Suits and the Scope of Congressional Power, 24 Envtl. … confusion exists as to the applicability of the ‘zone of interests’ test outside of the APA context"); June, The Structure of Standing Requirements for Citizen Suits and the Scope of Congressional Power, 24
520 U.S. 154Respondents Brief — United States v. Gouveia
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1984
(R.T. 397-399) In addition, his fingerprints were at that time, and at all times prior and subsequent to that, available for analysis. … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1970), (Stewart, J., dissenting).
467 U.S. 180Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cortez Maurice Crumble, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 7, 2020
Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2020)........ccccccccesseeereceeeereees 14, 15, 19 Vv United States v. … Medley, 972 F.3d 399, 406-16 (4th Cir. 2020), pet. for reh’g en banc granted, 828 Fed. Appx. 928 (Nov. 12, 2020).
Opposition Brief — James Joseph Garner, Petitioner v. Colorado
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Sep 19, 2019
Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970) ..................... 2 Com. v. Walker, 92 A.3d 766 (Pa. 2014).................... 23 Cordrey v. … CONCLUSION The petition for writ of certiorari should be denied. 24 Respectfully submitted, PHILIP J. WEISER Attorney General ERIC R.
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless
Federal Register · Notice · Feb 3, 2017
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 24 CFR part 581 and section 501 of the Stewart B. … For complete details concerning the processing of applications, the reader is encouraged to refer to the interim rule governing this program, 24 CFR part 581.
82 FR 9218Housing and Urban Development DepartmentAgency decision · Agency decision
Exhibit 7 at 279-399. The SOW for the operations and maintenance work required that Phoenix staff the contract with personnel qualified to perform those services. Id. at 292. … Exhibit 24 at 581, 584. Phoenix had fewer persons employed in the custodial functions than it had proposed. Id.
Civilian Board of Contract AppealsBrief for the Respondents in Opposition — Heilig Bros v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1942
S. 393, 399-400; United States v. Heinze, 218 U. S. 532, 545-546. … S. 177 (Pet., 24-25): but that case expressly affirms, not denies, the Board’s power to order reinstatement even if equivalent employment has been obtained.’
316 U.S. 701Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1924
Judicial Code, § 24, subd. 1. … Massachu- setts, 167 U.S. 43. 97851°—24— —10 Affirmed,
264 U.S. 140Reply Brief — United States v. Benchimol
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1985
The decision below also conflicts with decisions of other courts of appeals (see Pet. 17-19) and ignores established limitations on the granting of collateral relief (see Pet. 19-24). … Tursi, 576 F.2d 396, 399 (Ist Cir. 1978); Bergman vy. Lefkowitz, 569 F.2d 705, 714-716 =, 3 (2d Cir. 1977).
471 U.S. 453Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1974
% citmieommet. ol Pod In the Supreme Court of the United States OCTOBER TERM, 1974 No. 73-2032 LocAL 399, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, PETITIONER Vv. … C, C5; Tr. 24). In April, Union steward Jim Nalefskin told Galka that he had some cards for Galka to sign “in order * **to get [Galka’s] Union dues started again.”
419 U.S. 896Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 21, 2022
Accordingly, the limitations period began to run the following day, i.e., on August 24, 2018, and expired one year later. … Pryor admittedly knew on December 24, 2019, that the Ohio Supreme Court had denied his delayed application for leave to appeal.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.