Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.18s

  • Oral argument — Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency v. Whittaker Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2024

    There was no showing by plaintiff that they had to use GAC to clean it up. … And there was about $3.7 million in evidence shown in terms of estimates for blend and water costs from the date of trial through a certain period.

    73 min of audio
  • Oral argument — LaGloria Oil v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2007

    If you have one concluding comment that you would like to make, we will give you back your couple of minutes of rebuttal time. If I could save a couple of minutes for rebuttal. … We actually offered to sell fuel to, say, Tinker Air Force Base in 1994. Pick your year. And in that year, however, in that particular solicitation, DESC set aside 10%.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Richardson v. Booker

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2022

    It's kind of hard to say that throwing a table isn't an act of violence. Well, it's an act of ‑‑ it's a bad decision, but I don't think it's an act of violence. … Him throwing money in the air, not on her, but in the air, is not an act of violence. She started the act of violence by picking up a water bottle, throwing it at him, and striking him in his face.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Progressive Gulf Ins v. Faehnrich

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2008

    Yeah, it's part question, part comment. I'm concerned about jurisdiction in this case, and I meant to get an order out before argument, but didn't. … The children had not stayed in the jurisdiction for a particular period of time, but had demonstrated a period of intent to remain in the jurisdiction.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Whitford v. Salmonsen

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2025

    He can't keep his nose clean for more than a few days, apparently, before he offends again. … The district court here found that the clear conduct policy did not violate the appellant's rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jaime Alvarez v. City of San Bernardino

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2011

    witnesses were Absolutely coerced into making statements which were false against the Alvarez and Associates But in it now that you're into that let me ask you a question Can that does the district court air … nonetheless air if they miss on The affirmative act which in conjunction with the defamatory statements deprive the plaintiffs aren't there two alternatives for the district court to make and therefore

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Vista Securities Inc. v. DeKalb County Collector

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2016

    The county, under a trusteeship, is acting as trustee for the benefit of all these other taxing bodies within the county. … But DeKalb County as trustee for the taxing bodies has to act on behalf and in the best interest of all the taxing bodies that are included.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Viraj Profiles Limited v. ITC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2017

    The person there has acted somewhere contrary to law. Well, what do you think the ITC should have done? … When I've been involved in default cases in district courts and trial courts, they start clean. It doesn't matter what happened. They do what they did in Dow.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Heather Conahan v. Kathleen Sibelius

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2011

    I mean, isn't that why she wanted to act so quickly, because she was afraid that she was talking about a matter of weeks? … If you do a surgery and do not allow for clean margins, there's really no point in doing the surgery.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Shannon Riley v. S. Roach

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2014

    Morris's action is, over a period of several months, not releasing my client from his cell and reflecting on the timesheets that that happened anyway. … Well, both of them, they're saying that basically that they would have done the same thing, you know, they would have done the same thing whether the comment was made or not.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sant v. Stephens

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2020

    But I don't think even if you could find that was within the three year period, that it would save the First Amendment retaliation claim in this case. … So it's simply a matter of cleaning up municipal records as far as that goes. It's perfectly logical on the record what happens. Okay, anything else?

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jeff Hale v. Emerson Electric Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2019

    That's what they claim, but they didn't say, this has so many air watts, this has so many air watts, this has so the consumer can compare. … And there is no requirement to prove the elements of fraud under the MMPA, period. All that's required is an unlawful act and an ascertainable loss. And that's what we prove.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — OBOT v. City of Oakland

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2019

    The first, though, if I might be permitted to respond to Judge Pearsall's last comment, Your Honor, and then address yours. May I? Yeah. … The ordinance was a legislative act by the city council, and the resolution was essentially an adjudicatory act.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bridget Gordon v. Deloitte and Touche, LLP Group

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2013

    Is it, what act is it that breathed new life? Is it that letter? It is opening all of them together. The initial act is reopening the claim in response to the DOI complaint. … And at no time in that time period did MetLife ever say, your case is time barred.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — GENERAL ANESTHESIA v. PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2006

    They don't have to show causation for every one of these accounts that's beyond the billing period, that in fact that account is otherwise recoverable if the time period hadn't been delayed. … Well, why don't you comment specifically on the e-mail referred to by Mr. Kushner? The Pellaquin e-mail. The one that is due to operational downfall, the 350,000.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gluckstadt Holdings, L.L.C. v. VCR I, L.L.C.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2019

    Whether or not, because of the settlement agreement, the trustee acted improperly. … The purchaser has got title to the property, assisted by what Gluckstadt Holdings did to clean the title up when it was still acting as the fixer in this case.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Spokane Airport Board v. TSA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2025

    Typically, it's a dispute about whether an agency follows the Administrative Procedure Act, including notice and comment provisions. … And at that time, it's a 14-day period. There's a 30-day period for TSA to go through the TSRB.

    69 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Mejia-Castanon v. Atty Gen USA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 30, 2018

    So if there are bad acts that take place after the 10-year period and during the time of adjudication in front of the court, this is a discretionary application, and bad acts should always be taken into … That period is that ten-year period with all the parameters put in place with the Immigration Act, the parameters that includes the stop-time rule, that includes the period of time immediately preceding

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Arce v. Honeywell International Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2025

    The district court's dismissal of appellant Linda Arce's claims under both the False Claims Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act can be upheld on the record before this court. … Arce during the discovery period in this case.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Triple Canopy, Inc. v. Secretary of the Air Force

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2021

    Secretary of the Air Force Mr. Schaffer Thank you, Your Honor. May it please the Court, Jonathan Schaffer, Counsel for Appellant Triple Canopy. … If you have alcohol, it's illegal with some sections, period. And that changed. And then they said, alcohol is legal, but we're going to tax it.

    31 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.