Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.18s
Oral argument — Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency v. Whittaker Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2024
There was no showing by plaintiff that they had to use GAC to clean it up. … And there was about $3.7 million in evidence shown in terms of estimates for blend and water costs from the date of trial through a certain period.
73 min of audioOral argument — LaGloria Oil v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2007
If you have one concluding comment that you would like to make, we will give you back your couple of minutes of rebuttal time. If I could save a couple of minutes for rebuttal. … We actually offered to sell fuel to, say, Tinker Air Force Base in 1994. Pick your year. And in that year, however, in that particular solicitation, DESC set aside 10%.
36 min of audioOral argument — Richardson v. Booker
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2022
It's kind of hard to say that throwing a table isn't an act of violence. Well, it's an act of ‑‑ it's a bad decision, but I don't think it's an act of violence. … Him throwing money in the air, not on her, but in the air, is not an act of violence. She started the act of violence by picking up a water bottle, throwing it at him, and striking him in his face.
33 min of audioOral argument — Progressive Gulf Ins v. Faehnrich
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2008
Yeah, it's part question, part comment. I'm concerned about jurisdiction in this case, and I meant to get an order out before argument, but didn't. … The children had not stayed in the jurisdiction for a particular period of time, but had demonstrated a period of intent to remain in the jurisdiction.
22 min of audioOral argument — Whitford v. Salmonsen
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2025
He can't keep his nose clean for more than a few days, apparently, before he offends again. … The district court here found that the clear conduct policy did not violate the appellant's rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act.
41 min of audioOral argument — Jaime Alvarez v. City of San Bernardino
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2011
witnesses were Absolutely coerced into making statements which were false against the Alvarez and Associates But in it now that you're into that let me ask you a question Can that does the district court air … nonetheless air if they miss on The affirmative act which in conjunction with the defamatory statements deprive the plaintiffs aren't there two alternatives for the district court to make and therefore
28 min of audioOral argument — Vista Securities Inc. v. DeKalb County Collector
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2016
The county, under a trusteeship, is acting as trustee for the benefit of all these other taxing bodies within the county. … But DeKalb County as trustee for the taxing bodies has to act on behalf and in the best interest of all the taxing bodies that are included.
41 min of audioOral argument — Viraj Profiles Limited v. ITC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2017
The person there has acted somewhere contrary to law. Well, what do you think the ITC should have done? … When I've been involved in default cases in district courts and trial courts, they start clean. It doesn't matter what happened. They do what they did in Dow.
37 min of audioOral argument — Heather Conahan v. Kathleen Sibelius
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2011
I mean, isn't that why she wanted to act so quickly, because she was afraid that she was talking about a matter of weeks? … If you do a surgery and do not allow for clean margins, there's really no point in doing the surgery.
33 min of audioOral argument — Shannon Riley v. S. Roach
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2014
Morris's action is, over a period of several months, not releasing my client from his cell and reflecting on the timesheets that that happened anyway. … Well, both of them, they're saying that basically that they would have done the same thing, you know, they would have done the same thing whether the comment was made or not.
32 min of audioOral argument — Sant v. Stephens
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2020
But I don't think even if you could find that was within the three year period, that it would save the First Amendment retaliation claim in this case. … So it's simply a matter of cleaning up municipal records as far as that goes. It's perfectly logical on the record what happens. Okay, anything else?
24 min of audioOral argument — Jeff Hale v. Emerson Electric Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2019
That's what they claim, but they didn't say, this has so many air watts, this has so many air watts, this has so the consumer can compare. … And there is no requirement to prove the elements of fraud under the MMPA, period. All that's required is an unlawful act and an ascertainable loss. And that's what we prove.
41 min of audioOral argument — OBOT v. City of Oakland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2019
The first, though, if I might be permitted to respond to Judge Pearsall's last comment, Your Honor, and then address yours. May I? Yeah. … The ordinance was a legislative act by the city council, and the resolution was essentially an adjudicatory act.
41 min of audioOral argument — Bridget Gordon v. Deloitte and Touche, LLP Group
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2013
Is it, what act is it that breathed new life? Is it that letter? It is opening all of them together. The initial act is reopening the claim in response to the DOI complaint. … And at no time in that time period did MetLife ever say, your case is time barred.
39 min of audioOral argument — GENERAL ANESTHESIA v. PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2006
They don't have to show causation for every one of these accounts that's beyond the billing period, that in fact that account is otherwise recoverable if the time period hadn't been delayed. … Well, why don't you comment specifically on the e-mail referred to by Mr. Kushner? The Pellaquin e-mail. The one that is due to operational downfall, the 350,000.
37 min of audioOral argument — Gluckstadt Holdings, L.L.C. v. VCR I, L.L.C.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2019
Whether or not, because of the settlement agreement, the trustee acted improperly. … The purchaser has got title to the property, assisted by what Gluckstadt Holdings did to clean the title up when it was still acting as the fixer in this case.
36 min of audioOral argument — Spokane Airport Board v. TSA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2025
Typically, it's a dispute about whether an agency follows the Administrative Procedure Act, including notice and comment provisions. … And at that time, it's a 14-day period. There's a 30-day period for TSA to go through the TSRB.
69 min of audioOral argument — Mejia-Castanon v. Atty Gen USA
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 30, 2018
So if there are bad acts that take place after the 10-year period and during the time of adjudication in front of the court, this is a discretionary application, and bad acts should always be taken into … That period is that ten-year period with all the parameters put in place with the Immigration Act, the parameters that includes the stop-time rule, that includes the period of time immediately preceding
46 min of audioOral argument — Arce v. Honeywell International Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2025
The district court's dismissal of appellant Linda Arce's claims under both the False Claims Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act can be upheld on the record before this court. … Arce during the discovery period in this case.
32 min of audioOral argument — Triple Canopy, Inc. v. Secretary of the Air Force
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2021
Secretary of the Air Force Mr. Schaffer Thank you, Your Honor. May it please the Court, Jonathan Schaffer, Counsel for Appellant Triple Canopy. … If you have alcohol, it's illegal with some sections, period. And that changed. And then they said, alcohol is legal, but we're going to tax it.
31 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.